journal article·2018

Comparative Study of Highly Reflective ITO/DBR and Ni/Ag ohmic Contacts for GaN-Based Flip-Chip Light-Emitting Diodes

Xingtong Liu, Ning Li, Jinfeng Hu, Yinlin Gao, Ruiqing Wang, Shengjun Zhou

Publisher page

Abstract

Heat removal and current spreading uniformity are important for the realization of highly efficient light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Here we have compared two types of GaN-based flip-chip LEDs (FCLEDs) with highly reflective indium-tin oxide (ITO)/distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) and Ni/Ag p-type ohmic contacts. The via-based n-type contact structure was implemented to increase the utilization ratio of active region area and improve current spreading over the entire LEDs. Compared with FCLED with Ni/Ag, the FCLED with ITO/DBR shows a 6.3% higher light output power (LOP) at low current density of 31 A/cm2 (90 mA) due to higher reflectance of ITO/DBR ohmic contact. However, at high injection currents, the Ni/Ag ohmic contact in FCLED alleviates self-heating issue by means of its superior heat dissipation performance. We also found that the less area coverage between ITO and metallization layer have a negative influence on heat dissipation performance of FCLED with ITO/DBR. As a result, the maximum light output power (LOP) of the FCLED with Ni/Ag obtained at 292.8 A/cm2 is 1.3 times larger than that of FCLED with ITO/DBR obtained at 196.3 A/cm2.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · ZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.03.01910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.03.019 ↗
2. 10.1149/2.025405jss10.1149/2.025405jss ↗
3. 10.1143/JJAP.38.397610.1143/JJAP.38.3976 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep0582710.1038/srep05827 ↗
5. 10.1038/srep4462710.1038/srep44627 ↗
6. 10.1149/2.0211601jss10.1149/2.0211601jss ↗
7. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.05.04010.1016/j.optlastec.2012.05.040 ↗
8. 10.1143/JJAP.34.L79710.1143/JJAP.34.L797 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.06.01710.1016/j.optlastec.2013.06.017 ↗
10. 10.1109/JDT.2007.89533910.1109/JDT.2007.895339 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.298374010.1063/1.2983740 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.19410.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.194 ↗
13. 10.1038/ncomms244810.1038/ncomms2448 ↗
14. 10.1364/OL.29.00265610.1364/OL.29.002656 ↗
15. 10.1109/LPT.2007.91249110.1109/LPT.2007.912491 ↗
16. 10.1109/3.58548510.1109/3.585485 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.165133810.1063/1.1651338 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.275613910.1063/1.2756139 ↗
19. 10.1364/OE.20.00A11910.1364/OE.20.00A119 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.278511010.1063/1.2785110 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.06310.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.063 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.233700710.1063/1.2337007 ↗
23. 10.1109/TADVP.2007.89851010.1109/TADVP.2007.898510 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.optcom.2017.01.05010.1016/j.optcom.2017.01.050 ↗
25. 10.1364/OE.25.02661510.1364/OE.25.026615 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.137449910.1063/1.1374499 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.11510.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.115 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.01.08710.1016/j.apsusc.2009.01.087 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.183553510.1063/1.1835535 ↗
30. 10.1109/TADVP.2006.87118910.1109/TADVP.2006.871189 ↗
31. 10.1002/pssa.20160031910.1002/pssa.201600319 ↗
32. 10.1109/LPT.2006.88333010.1109/LPT.2006.883330 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.01.01710.1016/j.optlastec.2017.01.017 ↗
34. 10.1364/AO.56.00437510.1364/AO.56.004375 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.14410.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.144 ↗
36. 10.1109/JQE.2015.250290110.1109/JQE.2015.2502901 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.08.02610.1016/j.spmi.2017.08.026 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.137235910.1063/1.1372359 ↗
39. 10.1016/0038-1101(88)90099-810.1016/0038-1101(88)90099-8 ↗
40. 10.1109/31.13574310.1109/31.135743 ↗
41. 10.1109/TCAPT.2007.90633210.1109/TCAPT.2007.906332 ↗