Comparative Study of Highly Reflective ITO/DBR and Ni/Ag ohmic Contacts for GaN-Based Flip-Chip Light-Emitting Diodes
Source abstract
Abstract
Heat removal and current spreading uniformity are important for the realization of highly efficient light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Here we have compared two types of GaN-based flip-chip LEDs (FCLEDs) with highly reflective indium-tin oxide (ITO)/distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) and Ni/Ag p-type ohmic contacts. The via-based n-type contact structure was implemented to increase the utilization ratio of active region area and improve current spreading over the entire LEDs. Compared with FCLED with Ni/Ag, the FCLED with ITO/DBR shows a 6.3% higher light output power (LOP) at low current density of 31 A/cm2 (90 mA) due to higher reflectance of ITO/DBR ohmic contact. However, at high injection currents, the Ni/Ag ohmic contact in FCLED alleviates self-heating issue by means of its superior heat dissipation performance. We also found that the less area coverage between ITO and metallization layer have a negative influence on heat dissipation performance of FCLED with ITO/DBR. As a result, the maximum light output power (LOP) of the FCLED with Ni/Ag obtained at 292.8 A/cm2 is 1.3 times larger than that of FCLED with ITO/DBR obtained at 196.3 A/cm2.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · ZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.03.01910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.03.019 ↗
2. 10.1149/2.025405jss10.1149/2.025405jss ↗
3. 10.1143/JJAP.38.397610.1143/JJAP.38.3976 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep0582710.1038/srep05827 ↗
5. 10.1038/srep4462710.1038/srep44627 ↗
6. 10.1149/2.0211601jss10.1149/2.0211601jss ↗
7. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.05.04010.1016/j.optlastec.2012.05.040 ↗
8. 10.1143/JJAP.34.L79710.1143/JJAP.34.L797 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.06.01710.1016/j.optlastec.2013.06.017 ↗
10. 10.1109/JDT.2007.89533910.1109/JDT.2007.895339 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.298374010.1063/1.2983740 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.19410.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.194 ↗
13. 10.1038/ncomms244810.1038/ncomms2448 ↗
14. 10.1364/OL.29.00265610.1364/OL.29.002656 ↗
15. 10.1109/LPT.2007.91249110.1109/LPT.2007.912491 ↗
16. 10.1109/3.58548510.1109/3.585485 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.165133810.1063/1.1651338 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.275613910.1063/1.2756139 ↗
19. 10.1364/OE.20.00A11910.1364/OE.20.00A119 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.278511010.1063/1.2785110 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.06310.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.063 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.233700710.1063/1.2337007 ↗
23. 10.1109/TADVP.2007.89851010.1109/TADVP.2007.898510 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.optcom.2017.01.05010.1016/j.optcom.2017.01.050 ↗
25. 10.1364/OE.25.02661510.1364/OE.25.026615 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.137449910.1063/1.1374499 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.11510.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.115 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.01.08710.1016/j.apsusc.2009.01.087 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.183553510.1063/1.1835535 ↗
30. 10.1109/TADVP.2006.87118910.1109/TADVP.2006.871189 ↗
31. 10.1002/pssa.20160031910.1002/pssa.201600319 ↗
32. 10.1109/LPT.2006.88333010.1109/LPT.2006.883330 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.01.01710.1016/j.optlastec.2017.01.017 ↗
34. 10.1364/AO.56.00437510.1364/AO.56.004375 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.14410.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.144 ↗
36. 10.1109/JQE.2015.250290110.1109/JQE.2015.2502901 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.08.02610.1016/j.spmi.2017.08.026 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.137235910.1063/1.1372359 ↗
39. 10.1016/0038-1101(88)90099-810.1016/0038-1101(88)90099-8 ↗
40. 10.1109/31.13574310.1109/31.135743 ↗
41. 10.1109/TCAPT.2007.90633210.1109/TCAPT.2007.906332 ↗