Spiking Sensory Neurons for Analyzing Electrophysiological Data
Source abstract
Abstract
Low power consuming biomimetic neurons are considered for use in analyzing electrophysiological data. Starting with a circuit model of a Morris-Lecar inspired spiking neuron, we first investigate the dynamic properties. We demonstrate some of its neuro-computational features including type I and type II excitability, tonic and phasic spiking, spike latency and integration. Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are then used as excitatory input currents and it is shown that the spiking neurons can provide new insights into brain function. The spike rates of the neurons are employed in a classification task and shown to yield similar performance compared to one using the frequency dependence. We discuss how this circuit has the potential to significantly reduce EEG data, improve privacy and lower power consumption for portable EEG systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Neural dynamics and brain function
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Hasler · Front. Neurosci. · 2013 · 710.3389/fnins.2013.00118 ↗
2. Indiveri · Frontiers in Neuroscience · 2011 · 5
3. Izhikevich · IEEE Trans. Neural Networks · 2004 · 15 · 106310.1109/TNN.2004.832719 ↗
4. Cohen · 2014 · 600
5. Litt · Lancet Neurol · 2002 · 1 · 2210.1016/S1474-4422(02)00003-0 ↗
6. Truong · Neural Netw. · 2018 · 105 · 10410.1016/j.neunet.2018.04.018 ↗
7. Lazarou · Front Hum Neurosci · 2018 · 1210.3389/fnhum.2018.00014 ↗
8. McFarland · Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering · 2017 · 4 · 19410.1016/j.cobme.2017.11.004 ↗
9. Harrison · Proc. IEEE · 2008 · 96 · 120310.1109/JPROC.2008.922581 ↗
10. Sourikopoulos · Front. Neurosci. · 2017 · 1110.3389/fnins.2017.00123 ↗
11. Morris · Biophys. J. · 1981 · 35 · 19310.1016/S0006-3495(81)84782-0 ↗
12. Goodman · Front. Neurosci. · 2009 · 3 · 19210.3389/neuro.01.026.2009 ↗
13. Meurer · PeerJ Comput. Sci. · 2017 · 3 · e10310.7717/peerj-cs.103 ↗
14. Izhikevich · 2010 · 464
15. Tsumoto · Neurocomput. · 2006 · 69 · 29310.1016/j.neucom.2005.03.006 ↗
16. Patel · Electron. Lett · 1997 · 33 · 99710.1049/el:19970686 ↗
17. Behdad · IEEE Trans Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. · 2015 · 26 · 187510.1109/TNNLS.2014.2360072 ↗
18. Nicolas-Alonso · Sensors (Basel) · 2012 · 12 · 121110.3390/s120201211 ↗
19. Braithwaite · 2018
20. Radha · 2014 · 1876
21. Pedregosa · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2011 · 12 · 2825
22. Calvet · 2016 · 117
23. Casson · IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. · 2010 · 29 · 4410.1109/memb.2010.936545 ↗
24. Xu · 2018 · 163
25. Raducanu · 2018 · 211
26. Holleman · 2016 · 6331
27. Xu · IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. · 2020 · 14 · 42510.1109/TBCAS.2020.2972013 ↗
28. Kartsch · IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. · 2019 · 13 · 89310.1109/TBCAS.2019.2927551 ↗
29. Nease · 2016 · 2507
30. Danial · Nat. Electron. · 2019 · 2 · 59610.1038/s41928-019-0331-1 ↗
31. Yu · Proc. IEEE · 2018 · 106 · 26010.1109/JPROC.2018.2790840 ↗
32. Campana · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 387310.1002/adma.201470165 ↗
33. Cea · Nat. Mater. · 2020 · 19 · 67910.1038/s41563-020-0638-3 ↗
34. Friedman · IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I · 2016 · 63 · 89510.1109/TCSI.2016.2546064 ↗
35. Yousefzadeh · IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Curcuits Syst. · 2019 · 9 · 66810.1109/JETCAS.2019.2951121 ↗
36. Raez · Biol Proced Online · 2006 · 8 · 1110.1251/bpo115 ↗
37. Kumar · J. Med. Syst. · 2018 · 42 · 3410.1007/s10916-017-0886-1 ↗