journal article·2021-12-01

Effects of Chemical-Electrical and Mechanical Parameters on Electrical-induced Chemical Mechanical Polishing of GaN

Zhao Ding, Shiwei Niu, Qingyu Yao, Yongguang Wang, Huaijun Guan, Dong Zhao, Zexin Yu

Publisher page

Abstract

Overcoming the low fabricating efficiency of traditional chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) for Gallium nitride (GaN) is a challenge owing to its high hardness, high brittleness, and chemical inertness. Here, electrochemical etching is proposed to increase the material removal rate and acquire a high-quality surface on GaN wafers. To reveal the synergistic etching mechanism of oxidizing agent and corrosion inhibitor on the GaN wafers, electrochemical etching experiments were carried out. The optimal etching solution contained 4 wt% H 2 O 2 and 10 mmol l −1 purified terephthalic acid. Experiments with various polishing parameters were comparatively investigated to verify the auxiliary effect of etching and determine the ideal parameters. Cathodoluminescence spectroscopy shows that the electrochemical etching removes the SSDs completely and the CMP process with befitting parameters does not induce supernumerary SSDs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Fujita · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 5410.7567/JJAP.54.030101 ↗
2. Dai · J. Electron. Mater. · 2019 · 49 · 130110.1007/s11664-019-07683-9 ↗
3. Aida · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2013 · 25 · 18910.1149/2.024112jes ↗
4. Zhu · CSTIC · 2021 · pp · 110.1109/CSTIC52283.2021.9461445 ↗
5. Asghar · ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 3 · P27710.1149/2.0181407jss ↗
6. Aida · Precis. Eng.-J. Int. Soc. Precis. Eng. Nanotechnol. · 2021 · 67 · 35010.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.10.007 ↗
7. Ou · Precis. Eng.-J. Int. Soc. Precis. Eng. Nanotechnol. · 2019 · 55 · 1410.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.08.002 ↗
8. Yu · Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2021 · 121 · 10538710.1016/j.mssp.2020.105387 ↗
9. Deng · Electrochem. Commun. · 2015 · 52 · 510.1016/j.elecom.2015.01.002 ↗
10. Murata · Electrochem. Commun. · 2018 · 97 · 11010.1016/j.elecom.2018.11.006 ↗
11. Ishikawa · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2003 · 212 · 88510.1016/S0169-4332(03)00022-9 ↗
12. Lai · Phys. Status Solidi C · 2009 · 6 · S32510.1002/pssc.200880891 ↗
13. Zhang · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2020 · 51410.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145957 ↗
14. Kohler · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 10310.1063/1.2831004 ↗
15. Qin · Materials · 2017 · 10 · 141910.3390/ma10121419 ↗
16. Ozbek · ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2017 · 610.1149/2.0201711jss ↗
17. Shirsath · Electrochim. Acta · 2020 · 36310.1016/j.electacta.2020.137157 ↗
18. Dumitrescu · Electrochem. Commun. · 2009 · 11 · 208110.1016/j.elecom.2009.08.057 ↗
19. Deng · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2013 · 160 · A55310.1149/2.026304jes ↗
20. Huang · Electrochim. Acta · 2018 · 281 · 17010.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.136 ↗
21. Wang · ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 4 · P11210.1149/2.0191503jss ↗
22. Qin · Thin Solid Films · 2004 · 446 · 27710.1016/j.tsf.2003.09.060 ↗
23. Luo · Int. J. Extreme Manuf. · 2021 · 310.1088/2631-7990/abe915 ↗
24. Hanser · J. Cryst. Growth · 2007 · 305 · 37210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.03.039 ↗
25. Kumar · ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 2 · P110.1149/2.009301jss ↗
26. Zhang · Mater. Lett. · 2017 · 198 · 1210.1016/j.matlet.2017.03.170 ↗
27. Murata · J. Cryst. Growth · 2008 · 310 · 163710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.11.093 ↗
28. Devi · Sci. Total Environ. · 2016 · 571 · 64310.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.032 ↗
29. Murata · Electrochim. Acta · 2015 · 171 · 8910.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.166 ↗