Performance Comparison of InGaN-Based Phosphor Converted and AlGaInP-Based Red Light-Emitting Diode Packages for Vehicle Rear Fog Lamps
Source abstract
Abstract
We investigated the electrical and optical properties of chip LED and phosphor-converted red LED (pcR-LED) packages for a vehicle rear fog lamp application. The chip LED package had a lower forward voltage, narrower electroluminescence spectrum, and a larger view angle than the pcR-LED package. At 85 °C under 700 mA, the pcR-LED package emitted 26.8% more luminous flux than the chip LED package. After 1000 temperature cycles (−40 to +125 °C), the chip LED packages exhibited a 7.83% maintenance rate variance, whereas the pcR-LED packages showed a 2.78% change. Furthermore, after 1000 h under relative humidity conditions of 85 °C/85% both the samples demonstrated an average maintenance rate >98.66%. At 85 °C under 700 mA, it was demonstrated that the pcR-LED package exhibited a 48.9% lower thermal resistance (junction to package) than the chip LED package. Also for the chip LED package, the temperatures were 58.6 °C at the central region and 61.9 °C at its periphery, whereas the pcR-LED package had temperatures of 70.5 °C at the center and 55.8 °C at the periphery. Unlike the chip LED package, neither current nor temperature significantly affected the CIE coordinates of the pcR-LED packages.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Weisbuch · ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 910.1149/2.0392001JSS ↗
2. Kneissl · Nat. Photon. · 2019 · 13 · 23310.1038/s41566-019-0359-9 ↗
3. Piprek · ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 910.1149/2.0262001JSS ↗
4. Park · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 8710.1063/1.2008365 ↗
5. Taki · ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 910.1149/2.0402001JSS ↗
6. Kilic · 2019 · p.110.23919/SpliTech.2019.8783136 ↗
7. Kim · 2009 · 92610.1109/EPTC.2009.5416410 ↗
8. Yu · Proc. SPIE · 2013 · 883510.1117/12.2024842 ↗
9. Wördenweber · 2007
10. Ryu · Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · 288610.1364/OE.19.002886 ↗
11. Dai · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 9710.1063/1.3493654 ↗
12. Park · J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 11910.1063/1.4939504 ↗
13. Huang · Nat. Photon. · 2014 · 8 · 74810.1038/nphoton.2014.221 ↗
14. Han · Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. · 2015 · 31 · 15310.1016/j.mssp.2014.11.038 ↗
15. Hagiwara · J. Eastern. Asia Soc. Transport. Stud. · 2003 · 5 · 2722
16. Oh · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 58 · SCCC0810.7567/1347-4065/ab09db ↗
17. Gessmann · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 220310.1063/1.1643786 ↗
18. Zhao · Light: Sci. Applicat. · 2019 · 8 · 110.1038/s41377-018-0109-7 ↗
19. Tien · IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2016 · 63 · 397710.1109/TED.2016.2600259 ↗
20. Zhou · Proc. SPIE · 2014 · 927010.1117/12.2071610 ↗
21. Kim · Opt. Express · 2018 · 26 · 2863410.1364/OE.26.028634 ↗
22. Huang · J. Photon. for Energy · 2015 · 510.1117/1.JPE.5.057606 ↗
23. Li · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2016 · 4 · 819710.1039/C6TC02518H ↗