Atomic Layer Deposition of High Quality HfO2Using In-Situ Formed Hydrophilic Oxide as an Interfacial Layer
Source abstract
Abstract
High-quality HfO2 cannot be grown directly on Si substrate using atomic layer deposition (ALD), and an interfacial oxide layer is needed. Traditionally, interfacial oxide layer is formed either in SC1 solution (2 NH4OH: 4 H2O2: 200 H2O) or by ozonated water spraying. A highly hydrophilic SiO2 interfacial layer was in-situ formed in the ALD chamber using 1 cycle of ozone and water. The HfO2 deposited on this interfacial layer showed great growth linearity. The gate leakage current is comparable to that formed using chemical oxide as the interfacial layer. The capacitance-voltage (C-V) curves have negligible frequency dispersion and hysteresis, which suggest high quality in both the interface and electrical properties. The in-situ formation of hydrophilic interfacial layer have advantages over the traditional interfacial layer. This might be useful for formation of interfacial layer on sophisticated 3-D MOS structures such as FinFETs and nanowire FETs. In addition, the chemical oxidation step can be eliminated from the integrated circuits manufacturing processes, which is economically beneficial to the industry.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1143/APEX.2.01120110.1143/APEX.2.011201 ↗
2. 10.1116/1.296581310.1116/1.2965813 ↗
3. 10.1021/jp101363r10.1021/jp101363r ↗
4. 10.1016/S0167-9317(03)00291-010.1016/S0167-9317(03)00291-0 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.12577910.1063/1.125779 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0167-9317(01)00667-010.1016/S0167-9317(01)00667-0 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.151366210.1063/1.1513662 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.178762410.1063/1.1787624 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.216181910.1063/1.2161819 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0167-9317(02)00898-510.1016/S0167-9317(02)00898-5 ↗
11. 10.1021/jp101330310.1021/jp1013303 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.136790210.1063/1.1367902 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.12569410.1063/1.125694 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.205822610.1063/1.2058226 ↗
15. 10.1109/LED.2003.81256510.1109/LED.2003.812565 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.179484910.1063/1.1794849 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.185622110.1063/1.1856221 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0169-4332(96)00989-010.1016/S0169-4332(96)00989-0 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.168973210.1063/1.1689732 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.10.00310.1016/j.apsusc.2004.10.003 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.276422310.1063/1.2764223 ↗
22. 10.1116/1.476920610.1116/1.4769206 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.152281110.1063/1.1522811 ↗
24. Tsai W. Ragnarsson L.-A. Pantisano L. Chen P. Onsia B. Schram T. Cartier E. Kerber A. Young E. Caymax M. , in Electron Devices Meeting, 2003. IEDM’03 Technical Digest. IEEE International, p. 13.2. 1 (2003).
25. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.103-104.1910.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.103-104.19 ↗
26. 10.1149/1.348378910.1149/1.3483789 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01376-610.1016/S0040-6090(00)01376-6 ↗
28. Moulder J. F. Stickle W. F. Sobol P. E. Bomben K. D. , Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Perkin Elmer Eden Prairie, MN (1992).
29. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199807)26:8<549::AID-SIA396>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199807)26:8<549::AID-SIA396>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
30. 10.1063/1.11769210.1063/1.117692 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.12621410.1063/1.126214 ↗
32. Gusev E. Buchanan D. Cartier E. Kumar A. DiMaria D. Guha S. Callegari A. Zafar S. Jamison P. Neumayer D. , in Electron Devices Meeting, 2001. IEDM’01. Technical Digest. International, p. 20.1. 1 (2001).
33. Barlage D. Arghavani R. Dewey G. Doczy M. Doyle B. Kavalieros J. Murthy A. Roberds B. Stokley P. Chau R. , in Electron Devices Meeting, 2001. IEDM’01. Technical Digest. International, p. 10.6. 1 (2001).
34. 10.1109/55.86310910.1109/55.863109 ↗
35. 10.1109/T-ED.1975.1811710.1109/T-ED.1975.18117 ↗