Probing the electrical double layer by operando X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy through a graphene‐carbon nanotube composite window
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The electrical double layer is known to spontaneously form at the electrode‐electrolyte interface, impacting many important chemical and physical processes as well as applications including electrocatalysis, electroorganic synthesis, nanomaterial preparation, energy storage, and even emulsion stabilization. However, it has been challenging to study this fundamental phenomenon at the molecular level because the electrical double layer is deeply “buried” by the bulk electrolyte solution. Here, we report a quantitative probing of the electrical double layer of ionic liquids from the solid side of a photoelectron‐transparent graphene‐carbon nanotube hybrid membrane electrode using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The membrane window is ultrathin (1‐1.5 nm), large (~1 cm2), and robust, enabling a tight seal of the electrolyte and quantitative measurement with excellent photoelectron signals. By operando monitoring the population changes of cations and anions in response to the applied electrical potentials, we experimentally resolve the chemical structure and dynamics of the electrical double layer, which corroborate results from molecular dynamics simulations. image
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Advancements in Battery Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA
Chemical Science Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley California USA
Department of NanoEngineering University of California San Diego California USA
Maryland NanoCenter University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA
Funding
National Science Foundation · Office of Science · University of Maryland
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr00103a00810.1021/cr00103a008 ↗
2. 10.1021/cr400374x10.1021/cr400374x ↗
3. 10.1039/c3cp55186e10.1039/c3cp55186e ↗
4. 10.1002/andp.1879243070210.1002/andp.18792430702 ↗
5. 10.1051/jphystap:01910009004570010.1051/jphystap:019100090045700 ↗
6. 10.1080/1478644040863418710.1080/14786440408634187 ↗
7. The theory of the electrolytic double shift
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.08910.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.089 ↗
9. 10.1021/cr500003w10.1021/cr500003w ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.04610210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.046102 ↗
11. 10.1021/ja104273r10.1021/ja104273r ↗
12. 10.1021/jp710073210.1021/jp7100732 ↗
13. 10.1021/jp200544b10.1021/jp200544b ↗
14. Heide P · 2012
15. 10.1038/ncomms1269510.1038/ncomms12695 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep0978810.1038/srep09788 ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat184910.1038/nmat1849 ↗
18. 10.1021/cr900070d10.1021/cr900070d ↗
19. 10.1021/jacs.7b0736510.1021/jacs.7b07365 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0446010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04460 ↗
21. 10.1002/anie.20150604410.1002/anie.201506044 ↗
22. 10.1038/nnano.2011.13010.1038/nnano.2011.130 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0064010.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00640 ↗
24. 10.1021/nn501132n10.1021/nn501132n ↗
25. 10.1021/nn201207c10.1021/nn201207c ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20170063910.1002/adma.201700639 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.7b1096810.1021/acsami.7b10968 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0442910.1021/acsnano.7b04429 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20190164110.1002/adma.201901641 ↗
30. 10.1021/jp036971t10.1021/jp036971t ↗
31. 10.1038/nnano.2009.30210.1038/nnano.2009.302 ↗
32. 10.1038/nnano.2010.8610.1038/nnano.2010.86 ↗
33. 10.1126/science.117124510.1126/science.1171245 ↗
34. 10.1126/science.115696510.1126/science.1156965 ↗
35. 10.1021/nl071254m10.1021/nl071254m ↗
36. 10.1038/nmat285110.1038/nmat2851 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0275910.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02759 ↗
38. 10.1021/jp805961810.1021/jp8059618 ↗
39. 10.1039/C5CP04058B10.1039/C5CP04058B ↗