journal article·2020-06Open access

Nanobiopesticides: Silica nanoparticles with spiky surfaces enable dual adhesion and enhanced performance

Jun Zhang, Geoff Brown, Jianye Fu, Peter James, Lillian Mukandiwa, Xiaodan Huang, Chengzhong Yu

EcoMat· Volume 2· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract Biopesticides, such as spinosad, are a new‐generation of ecofriendly pesticides in livestock industry. However, spinosad suffers from short duration of effectiveness and low potency in field conditions. Herein we report the development of a new nanospinosad design with dual adhesion and protection functions. Silica nanoparticles with spiky nanotopography loaded with spinosad possess rough surfaces. When applied topically, this nanospinosad formulation exhibited enhanced adhesion to both cattle hair and pest surface. The dual adhesion property led to significantly higher pest mortality toward tick (Rhipicephalus microplus, an ectoparasite) than a nanospinosad formulation using nanoparticles with smooth surface and a benchmark commercial product. The adhesion performance was further quantitatively measured using rainfastness test. Moreover, solar radiation test revealed that the nanospinosad exhibited >10 times higher photostability over the commercial product. This work paves the way toward the development of high performance nanobiopesticides for sustainable agricultural applications. image
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Insect and Pesticide Research · Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control · Insect Pest Control Strategies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

Department of Agriculture and Fisheries Agri‐Science Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

Funding

Australian National Fabrication Facility · Queensland Government · Australian Research Council · Elanco Animal Health

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/np300024u10.1021/np300024u ↗
2. 10.1021/jf504252n10.1021/jf504252n ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.10.00510.1016/j.tplants.2016.10.005 ↗
4. 10.1002/ps.137810.1002/ps.1378 ↗
5. 1995 Proc. Beltwide Cotton Production Conference San Antonio TX GD Thompson Spinosyns: an overview of new natural insect management systems 1039 1043
6. 10.1002/1526-4998(200008)56:8<696::AID-PS182>3.0.CO;2-510.1002/1526-4998(200008)56:8<696::AID-PS182>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
7. 10.1038/ja.2010.510.1038/ja.2010.5 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00108-310.1016/S0278-6915(00)00108-3 ↗
9. Effects of spinosad, a new insect control agent naturally derived on the mealybug parasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii Howard (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae)
10. 10.1002/1526-4998(200102)57:2<177::AID-PS281>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/1526-4998(200102)57:2<177::AID-PS281>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
11. 10.1603/0022-0493-93.6.163810.1603/0022-0493-93.6.1638 ↗
12. 10.1093/ee/27.1.15410.1093/ee/27.1.154 ↗
13. 10.1080/095831503100014095610.1080/0958315031000140956 ↗
14. Effect of repeated spinosad treatments on cattle against Boophilus annulatus under South Texas field conditions
15. 10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00456-310.1016/S0304-4017(01)00456-3 ↗
16. 10.1080/03601234.2013.77861410.1080/03601234.2013.778614 ↗
17. 10.1080/03601234.2012.66566710.1080/03601234.2012.665667 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.3694310.1002/app.36943 ↗
19. 10.3109/02652048.2012.66896010.3109/02652048.2012.668960 ↗
20. 10.1002/ps.326810.1002/ps.3268 ↗
21. 10.1080/10643389.2012.67175010.1080/10643389.2012.671750 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41565-018-0131-110.1038/s41565-018-0131-1 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.envint.2013.11.01510.1016/j.envint.2013.11.015 ↗
24. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for protein protection and delivery
25. 10.1002/adma.20120529210.1002/adma.201205292 ↗
26. 10.1021/jf504455x10.1021/jf504455x ↗
27. 10.1584/jpestics.D12-02710.1584/jpestics.D12-027 ↗
28. 10.1002/ps.130110.1002/ps.1301 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b0195710.1021/acs.jafc.7b01957 ↗
30. Preparation and characterization of 1‐naphthylacetic acid‐silica conjugated nanospheres for enhancement of controlled‐release performance10.1088/0957-4484/24/3/035601 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41598-017-00036-810.1038/s41598-017-00036-8 ↗
32. Effect of rainfall exposure immediately after a single dip treatment with Coumaphos on the control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) on infested cattle10.1603/033.046.0112 ↗
33. 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00912.x10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00912.x ↗
34. Bylemans D · 2000 · 33
35. 10.1603/EC1107710.1603/EC11077 ↗
36. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199902)55:2<198::AID-PS867>3.0.CO;2-R10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199902)55:2<198::AID-PS867>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
37. 10.1093/jee/89.4.86310.1093/jee/89.4.863 ↗
38. 10.1038/nature0481710.1038/nature04817 ↗
39. 10.1039/C0JM02246B10.1039/C0JM02246B ↗
40. 10.1007/BF0098410310.1007/BF00984103 ↗
41. 10.1021/jacs.6b0024310.1021/jacs.6b00243 ↗
42. 10.1021/jacs.7b0897410.1021/jacs.7b08974 ↗
43. 10.1039/C4TB01332H10.1039/C4TB01332H ↗
44. Evaluation of released malathion and spinosad from chitosan/alginate/gelatin capsules against Culex pipiens larvae
45. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.12.08810.1016/j.jcis.2010.12.088 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.04.03110.1016/j.micromeso.2018.04.031 ↗
47. 10.1603/0022-2585-39.4.64510.1603/0022-2585-39.4.645 ↗
48. Lopez BB · 1996 · 18210.1520/STP16042S ↗
49. Determination of sixteen pesticides in peppers using high‐performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry
50. 10.1002/rcm.305110.1002/rcm.3051 ↗