A carbon dot toolbox for managing biotic and abiotic stresses in crop production systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The productivity of global crop production is under threat caused by various biotic and abiotic adverse conditions, such as plant diseases and pests, which are responsible for 20%–40% of global crop losses estimated at a value of USD 220 billion, and can be further exacerbated by climate change. Agricultural industries are calling for game‐changer technologies to enable productive and sustainable farming. Carbon dots (C‐dots) are carbon‐based nanoparticles, smaller than 50 nm, exhibiting unique opto‐electro‐properties. They have been shown to have positive impact on managing diverse biotic and abiotic stresses faced by the crops. Owing to their versatile carbon chemistry, the surface functionalities of C‐dots can be readily tuned to regulate plant physiological processes. This review is focussed on establishing the correlations between the physiochemical properties of C‐dots and their impacts on plants growth and health. The summary of the literature demonstrates that C‐dots hold great promise in improving plant tolerance to heat, drought, toxic chemicals, and invading pathogens. image
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Nematode management and characterization studies · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Queensland Micro‐ and Nanotechnology Centre Griffith University Brisbane Queensland Australia
School of Engineering and Built Environment Griffith University Brisbane Queensland Australia
Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security Griffith University Brisbane Queensland Australia
Institute for Integrated Intelligent Systems Griffith University Brisbane Queensland Australia
Sugar Research Australia Woodford Queensland Australia
Funding
Australian Research Council
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.2016.
2. 10.1038/ncomms229610.1038/ncomms2296 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.est.2c0211710.1021/acs.est.2c02117 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41893‐022‐00940‐610.1038/s41893‐022‐00940‐6 ↗
5. USEPA · 2023
6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · 2019
7. Evaluation of nitrogen fertilizer fates and related environmental risks for Main cereals in China's croplands from 2004 to 2018
8. 10.1186/s12951-021-01214-710.1186/s12951-021-01214-7 ↗
9. 10.1038/nplants.2016.20710.1038/nplants.2016.207 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41477‐022‐01152‐810.1038/s41477‐022‐01152‐8 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10311‐022‐01409‐w10.1007/s10311‐022‐01409‐w ↗
12. The effect of iron nanoparticles spraying time and concentration on wheat
13. 10.1094/PDIS‐93‐10‐103710.1094/PDIS‐93‐10‐1037 ↗
14. 10.1111/ppl.1307710.1111/ppl.13077 ↗
15. 10.1021/es402209w10.1021/es402209w ↗
16. 10.1186/s12951‐022‐01483‐w10.1186/s12951‐022‐01483‐w ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cropd.2022.10000610.1016/j.cropd.2022.100006 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.05010.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.050 ↗
19. Salem KFM · 2021 · 1
20. Carbon‐based nanomaterials for sustainable agriculture: their application as light converters, nanosensors, and delivery tools
21. 10.1038/s41565‐021‐01051‐710.1038/s41565‐021‐01051‐7 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41377‐022‐00778‐910.1038/s41377‐022‐00778‐9 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0017010.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00170 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0540610.1021/acsnano.5b05406 ↗
25. 10.1021/ja040082h10.1021/ja040082h ↗
26. 10.1021/ja062677d10.1021/ja062677d ↗
27. 10.1039/C9QM00592G10.1039/C9QM00592G ↗
28. 10.1002/anie.20090065210.1002/anie.200900652 ↗
29. 10.1002/smsc.20220001210.1002/smsc.202200012 ↗
30. 10.1039/D1TB02446A10.1039/D1TB02446A ↗
31. 10.1039/C6TB01259K10.1039/C6TB01259K ↗
32. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0414210.1021/acsanm.1c04142 ↗
33. 10.1039/C6CC03302D10.1039/C6CC03302D ↗
34. 10.1021/accountsmr.1c0019410.1021/accountsmr.1c00194 ↗
35. 10.1021/acssensors.9b0051410.1021/acssensors.9b00514 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.09.01310.1016/j.jcis.2014.09.013 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.01.00210.1016/j.crvi.2008.01.002 ↗
38. 10.1093/aob/mcf07610.1093/aob/mcf076 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b0661510.1021/acs.jafc.9b06615 ↗
40. 10.1002/anie.20120679110.1002/anie.201206791 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.6b0726810.1021/acsami.6b07268 ↗
42. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0830810.1021/acssuschemeng.0c08308 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsabm.8b0034510.1021/acsabm.8b00345 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41598‐018‐26167‐010.1038/s41598‐018‐26167‐0 ↗
45. 10.1039/C3NR06079A10.1039/C3NR06079A ↗
46. Carbon dots as light converter for plant photosynthesis: augmenting light coverage and quantum yield effect
47. 10.1002/adfm.20180400410.1002/adfm.201804004 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0241910.1021/acsanm.0c02419 ↗
49. 10.1186/s12870‐021‐02901‐110.1186/s12870‐021‐02901‐1 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsami.0c1172410.1021/acsami.0c11724 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.15110510.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151105 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.05110.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.051 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e0039710.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00397 ↗
54. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0934810.1021/acssuschemeng.0c09348 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0065710.1021/acsomega.7b00657 ↗
56. 10.1039/D1EN00715G10.1039/D1EN00715G ↗
57. 10.1104/pp.20.0073310.1104/pp.20.00733 ↗
58. 10.1039/C9QM00614A10.1039/C9QM00614A ↗
59. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0359110.1021/acsnano.2c03591 ↗
60. 10.3389/fenvs.2017.0001210.3389/fenvs.2017.00012 ↗
61. 10.1039/C6RA01163B10.1039/C6RA01163B ↗
62. 10.1111/j.1365‐313X.2012.04927.x10.1111/j.1365‐313X.2012.04927.x ↗
63. 10.1039/C8NR01644E10.1039/C8NR01644E ↗
64. 10.3791/5431710.3791/54317 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.etap.2015.02.00910.1016/j.etap.2015.02.009 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15481710.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154817 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.12886010.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128860 ↗
68. 10.1007/s11356‐022‐24878‐610.1007/s11356‐022‐24878‐6 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.15150610.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151506 ↗
70. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0384310.1021/acsanm.2c03843 ↗
71. MinhasPS RaneJ PasalaRK.Abiotic stress management for resilient agriculture.2017.10.1007/978-981-10-5744-1 ↗
72. Abiotic stresses: general defenses of land plants and chances for engineering multistress tolerance
73. 10.1111/tpj.1329910.1111/tpj.13299 ↗
74. 10.1007/s11101‐020‐09708‐210.1007/s11101‐020‐09708‐2 ↗
75. 10.4161/psb.6.11.1772910.4161/psb.6.11.17729 ↗
76. 10.1093/jxb/erm28410.1093/jxb/erm284 ↗
77. 10.1002/9781119463665.ch1210.1002/9781119463665.ch12 ↗
78. Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants
79. 10.4161/psb.2368110.4161/psb.23681 ↗
80. 10.1111/plb.1336710.1111/plb.13367 ↗
81. 10.3389/fpls.2015.0097710.3389/fpls.2015.00977 ↗
82. 10.3389/fpls.2015.0082710.3389/fpls.2015.00827 ↗
83. 10.3389/fpls.2021.64482310.3389/fpls.2021.644823 ↗
84. 10.4161/psb.2.2.417610.4161/psb.2.2.4176 ↗
85. 10.3390/agronomy1006078810.3390/agronomy10060788 ↗
86. 10.3389/fpls.2014.0008610.3389/fpls.2014.00086 ↗
87. 10.1007/s11738‐016‐2101‐210.1007/s11738‐016‐2101‐2 ↗
88. 10.1007/s11104‐016‐2893‐210.1007/s11104‐016‐2893‐2 ↗
89. 10.21162/PAKJAS/17.365910.21162/PAKJAS/17.3659 ↗
90. 10.3390/antiox502001510.3390/antiox5020015 ↗
91. 10.1038/nnano.2007.26010.1038/nnano.2007.260 ↗
92. 10.1039/C7SC05476A10.1039/C7SC05476A ↗
93. 10.1021/nn402680610.1021/nn4026806 ↗
94. 10.1007/s11051‐016‐3642‐410.1007/s11051‐016‐3642‐4 ↗
95. 10.1186/s11671‐020‐03344‐710.1186/s11671‐020‐03344‐7 ↗
96. 10.3164/jcbn.11‐7010.3164/jcbn.11‐70 ↗
97. 10.1007/s11010‐014‐2252‐710.1007/s11010‐014‐2252‐7 ↗
98. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab0c5510.1088/2053-1591/ab0c55 ↗
99. Fluorescent carbon dots in baked lamb: formation, cytotoxicity and scavenging capability to free radicals
100. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0110110.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01101 ↗