journal article·2024-10-31Open access

Dimensional stability and mechanical performance of face-glued spruce-pine-fir and Douglas-fir studs

Sophia Cook, Amir Ghavidel, Jianhui Zhou

Abstract

Warpage of dimensional lumber has been identified to be the major issue for its use in wood construction prefabrication companies in North America. Face-gluing is a promising technique to mitigate warp of dimensional lumber. This paper studies the dimensional stability and mechanical performance efficacy of 2-ply face-glued lumber to reduce warpage in both Spruce-Pine-Fir (S-P-F) and Douglas-fir (D.fir) lumber. Planks were paired and subsequently laminated based on their initial dynamic modulus of elasticity (MOE) and shape compatibility. Warp was measured in twist, bow, and crook at varying moisture contents. Mechanical performance was measured through the MOE, modulus of rupture (MOR), and shear strength. This pairing regime between component planks offers a means to reduce the twist and bow tendencies of face-glued lumber while increasing the lumber strength uniformity. Flexural MOE and MOR performances were consistent with visual grades of No.1/No.2, showing the potential of face-glued lumber as a value-added product for the automatic prefabrication of wood constructions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tree Root and Stability Studies · Forest Biomass Utilization and Management · Wood Treatment and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/f1406120210.3390/f14061202 ↗
2. ASTM. 2013. Standard D 905 - 08 (Reapproved 2013) Standard Test Methods of Strength Properties of Adhesive Bonds in Shear by Compression Loading. (West Conshohocken: ASTM International).
3. ASTM. 2015. Standard D 198-15 Standard Test Methods of Static Tests of Lumber in Structural Sizes. (West Conshohocken: ASTM International).
4. 10.1007/s00226-009-0292-z10.1007/s00226-009-0292-z ↗
5. Cai, Z., Dickens J. R., 2004. Wood composite warping: modeling and simulation. Wood and Fiber Science, 36:174–185.
6. CSA. 2014. CSA-O86-14: Engineering design in wood. (Toronto: CSA Group).
7. CSA. 2016. CSA-O122-16: Structural glue-laminated timber. (Toronto: CSA Group).
8. 10.1007/s00107-005-0058-810.1007/s00107-005-0058-8 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00107-004-0468-z10.1007/s00107-004-0468-z ↗
10. 10.1007/BF0261501710.1007/BF02615017 ↗
11. Johansson, M., Kliger, R., 2002. Influence of Material Characteristics on Warp In Norway Spruce Studs. Wood Fiber Sci. 325–336.
12. 10.1007/s00226-015-0775-z10.1007/s00226-015-0775-z ↗
13. NLGA., 2015. NGLA SPS 6: Special Products Standard for Structural Face-Glued Lumber. (New Westminster: National Lumber Grades Authority).
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13441810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134418 ↗
15. Ormarsson, S., Cown, D., 2005. Moisture-Related Distortion of Timber Boards of Radiata Pine: Comparison With Norway Spruce. Wood Fiber Sci. 424–436.
16. 10.1007/s00226005012610.1007/s002260050126 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00107005048110.1007/s001070050481 ↗
18. Serrano, R., Cassens,D., 2001. Reducing warp and checking in plantation-grown yellow-poplar 4 by 4’s by reversing part positions and gluing in the green condition. Forest Products Journal, (37–40), Forest Products Society.
19. Wang, X., 2013. Stress Wave E-Rating of Structural Timber—Size and Moisture Content Effects. USDA For. Serv. For. Prod. Lab. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-226 2013 Pp 38-46 226, 38–46.
20. 10.1177/00405175020720111410.1177/004051750207201114 ↗