Efficiency and Ability of Employees to Work in Relation to Timber Quality and Structural Ageing
Source abstract
Abstract
Small and medium-sized enterprises play a crucial role in job creation in the wood industry.The process of employee ageing and avoidance of heavy physical effort affect the labour market contribution.The need to increase work efficiency is certainly reflected in the pressures on employees.Workplace health investigations with the Work Ability Index (WAI) is a one of several tools that take into account job requirements, the employee health status and their resources.In the conducted study, an attempt was made to assess the workability of logging workers in the private sector of small and medium-sized enterprises.Excellent work readiness was found only among harvester and forwarder operators aged 20-30.Different dynamics of WAI decline as a function of age were also observed.In general, for the study group, the WAI fluctuated at a moderate level depending on the technical equipment, age of the employees, BMI, log dimensions and quality (pulp, industry or large saw log wood) or machine productivity.The worst situation was observed during silvicultural treatments of deciduous (beech) stands using the cut-to-length (short saw log wood harvesting) method.Ageing, being overweight, deteriorating health and the mainly physical nature of work are risk factors for low (mediocre) work capacity.It can partially be modelled by increasing employee engagement through an appropriate incentive system.We often observed differences between the work demands determined by the employer's expectations and the social, physical, and health limitations of employees, which led them to seek easier jobs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Forest Biomass Utilization and Management · Forest Management and Policy · Assembly Line Balancing Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.12841/wood.1644-3985.350.0710.12841/wood.1644-3985.350.07 ↗
2. Ackerman P., Gleasure E. L., Ackerman S., Shuttleworth B. [2014]: Standards for time studies for the South African Forest Industry. 1. ed. ICFR/FESA.
3. Annex nr 1 to DGLP order nr 66. [2019]: Zasady Użytkowania Lasu (Forest Management Regulation), General Directorate of the State Forests.
4. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-09123510.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10926-019-09871-010.1007/s10926-019-09871-0 ↗
6. 10.1136/oem.2008.03988310.1136/oem.2008.039883 ↗
7. Brecher N. D. [2014]: The chameleon employee: it's true, people also blend into their environments--but is it the right environment? Journal of Property Management 79 [5]: 20-21.
8. 10.12841/wood.1644-3985.284.0110.12841/wood.1644-3985.284.01 ↗
9. El Fassi M., Bocquet V., Majery N., Lair, M. L., Couffignal S., Mairiaux P. [2013]: Work ability assessment in a worker population: comparison and determinants of Work Ability Index and Work Ability score. BMC public health 13[1]: 1-10.10.1186/1471-2458-13-305 ↗
10. Eurostat [2022]: Wood products – production and trade. [accessed: 03.04.2023]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Wood_products_-_production_and_trade.
11. Eurostat [2023]: Employment and activity by sex and age - annual data. [accessed 03.04.2023]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/lfsi_emp_a/default/table?lang=en.
12. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x ↗
13. Geissler H., Tempel, J., Geissler-Gruber B. [2005]: Can the Work Ability Index also be used by non-medical professionals? A comparative study. In International Congress Series Elsevier, volume 1280, June 2005: 281-285.10.1016/j.ics.2005.02.050 ↗
14. 10.3390/ijerph1709305510.3390/ijerph17093055 ↗
15. GUS [2021a]. Rocznik Statystyczny Leśnictwa 2021. (Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2021). Zakład Wydawnictw Statystycznych, Warszawa.
16. GUS [2021b]. Rocznik Statystyczny Pracy 2021 (Statistical Yearbook of Work 2021). Zakład Wydawnictw Statystycznych, Warszawa.
17. Hagen K. B., Magnus P. E. R., Vetlesen K. [1998]: Neck/shoulder and low-back disorders in the forestry industry: relationship to work tasks and perceived psychosocial job stress. Ergonomics 41 [10]: 1510-1518.10.1080/001401398186243 ↗
18. 10.1080/14942119.2016.117049510.1080/14942119.2016.1170495 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.12047810.1016/j.techfore.2020.120478 ↗
20. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31818dbf9210.1097/JOM.0b013e31818dbf92 ↗
21. 10.5552/crojfe.2021.87410.5552/crojfe.2021.874 ↗
22. Landekić M., Martinić I., Bakarić M., Šporčić M. [2013]: Work ability index of forestry machine operators and some ergonomic aspects of their work. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 34 [2]: 241-254.
23. Makowiec-Dąbrowska T., Koszada-Włodarczyk W., Bortkiewicz A., Gadzicka E., Siedlecka J., Jóźwiak Z., Pokorski J. [2008]: Zawodowe i pozazawodowe determinanty zdolności do pracy (Professional and non-professional determinants of employability). Medycyna Pracy 59 [1]: 9-249-24.
24. Malińska M., Bugajska J., Bartuzi, P. [2019]: Zdolność do pracy (WAI) polskich pracowników biurowych (The ability to work (WAI) of Polish office workers). Hygeia Public Health 54 [4]: 251-257.
25. 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.00710.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.007 ↗
26. 10.12841/wood.1644-3985.D03.0710.12841/wood.1644-3985.D03.07 ↗
27. Sertić, M. B., Barcic, A. P., & Klarić, K. [2018]. Economic determinants and analysis of the European Union wood industry SMEs employment. BioResources, 13 [1]: 522-534.
28. TIBCO Software Inc. [2017]: Statistica (data analysis software system).
29. Tuomi K., Ilmarinen J., Jahkola A., Katajarinne L., Tulkki A. [1998]: Work ability index. [19]. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki.
30. WAI-NETZWERK. [2018]: Work Ability Index (WAI) - Questionnaire (short version) [accesed 20.03.2020]. Available from: http://www.mentalhealthpromotion.net/resources/waikurzversion.pdf.