Neural Algorithm Aided Operation of CO2 Electrolyzers
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide While the number of reports on the electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction increases at an ever-accelerating rate, achieving long-term stable, selective, and energy efficient operation is still challenging. This can be attributed mostly to the short length of lab-scale measurements and the complexity of cell operation parameters. Here we introduce a high-throughput cell operation testing methodology, including data evaluation and process optimization by machine learning algorithms. An autonomously operating test station allowed collection of enough data to develop an artificial neural network model. When the model is trained on a fraction of a large data set, predictions for the operation of the same cell under different conditions are very precise. Accurate predictions can also be made for newly assembled cells and at parameter settings outside of the training parameter space. Our results pave the way for the long-term stable operation of CO 2 electrolyzers by the adaptive optimization of the process conditions based on machine-learning-based holistic data evaluation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physical Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Szeged, Aradi sq. 1, Szeged 6720, Hungary
eChemicles Zrt, Alsó Kikötő sor 11, Szeged 6726, Hungary
Department of Software Engineering, University of Szeged, Szeged, Árpád sq. 2. Szeged 6720, Hungary
Funding
Nemzeti Kutat?si, Fejleszt?si ?s Innovaci?s Alap · HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council · Nemzeti Kutat?si Fejleszt?si ?s Innov?ci?s Hivatal
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.00510.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.005 ↗
2. 10.1088/2515-7655/ac782310.1088/2515-7655/ac7823 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0095510.1021/acsenergylett.4c00955 ↗
4. 10.1039/D3SE00775H10.1039/D3SE00775H ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cherd.2024.07.01410.1016/j.cherd.2024.07.014 ↗
6. 10.1038/s42004-023-00836-210.1038/s42004-023-00836-2 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15169810.1016/j.cej.2024.151698 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cattod.2023.11421710.1016/j.cattod.2023.114217 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0244610.1021/acsenergylett.3c02446 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.coelec.2023.10124810.1016/j.coelec.2023.101248 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0062010.1021/acsenergylett.3c00620 ↗
12. 10.1088/2515-7655/ad0a3910.1088/2515-7655/ad0a39 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13492010.1016/j.cej.2022.134920 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41565-020-00823-x10.1038/s41565-020-00823-x ↗
15. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c0063010.1021/acssuschemeng.4c00630 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ccst.2023.10013310.1016/j.ccst.2023.100133 ↗
17. 10.1039/D1SE01534F10.1039/D1SE01534F ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20250150510.1002/anie.202501505 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcat.2023.11520910.1016/j.jcat.2023.115209 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.01.01310.1016/j.joule.2023.01.013 ↗
21. 10.1002/cite.20220020610.1002/cite.202200206 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.egyai.2024.10036110.1016/j.egyai.2024.100361 ↗
23. 10.3390/su1621955510.3390/su16219555 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0834310.1021/acs.jpcc.2c08343 ↗
25. 10.1021/jacs.1c0033910.1021/jacs.1c00339 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ccst.2023.10013810.1016/j.ccst.2023.100138 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.07010.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.070 ↗
28. Loshchilov, I.; Hutter, F. Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization. arXiv (Computer Science, Machine Learning), January 4, 2019, 1711.05101 Ver. 3. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05101 (accessed 2025-06-10).
29. 10.1109/4235.99601710.1109/4235.996017 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41560-021-00813-w10.1038/s41560-021-00813-w ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c0069010.1021/acs.jpcc.4c00690 ↗