journal article·2025-06-02Open access

Influences of UF adhesive consumption on HDF properties

Osman Çamlıbel, Murat Aydın

Abstract

In this study, high-density fiberboards were produced using five different Urea-Formaldehyde resin (0.98 mole) consumption amount (12.47, 11.55, 11.12, 10.65, and 10.1 % wt. of dry fiber), and physical, mechanical, and formaldehyde content properties of fiberboards were determined. Tested boards were produced using the continuous through-feed press in an operating factory instead of laboratory-type press equipment. According to results, a linear and stable increase or decrease tendencies with the increase in adhesive consumption was not observed for almost all properties. Contrary, values of properties oscillated with the increase in adhesive consumption. Except for the Surface Soundness (SS), means of the physical and mechanical properties presented significant differences. The most advanced properties was SS by 25.4% when UF consumption was 105 kg/m³. For the physical properties, it was Surface Abrasion by 15.7% improvement at the same consumption amount. For thickness swelling (TS 2h and 24 h) and water absorption 115 kg/m³ consumption provided highest improvement by 15.3%, 6.8% and 8.7% decreases. Therefore, considering all evaluated properties, a common consumption amount could not be determined which pointed out the best improvement. One of the most important points about the panels was the formaldehyde emission value. The FE around 17.6% decreased when UF consumption was 115 kg/m³. However, FE values are determined above the E1 class value which should be reduced for the market.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Textile materials and evaluations · Color Science and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Açık, C., & Tutuş, A. (2012). Effects of Various Synthetic Surface Coatings on Thermal Conductivity of Fiberboard. Duzce Universitesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 8(2), 1–8.
2. 10.3390/polym1302022010.3390/polym13020220 ↗
3. Bayram, B. Ç., Ersen, N., Akyüz, İ., Üçüncü, T., & Akyüz, K. C. (2018). An analytical Hierarchy Process application: Determining the most important board type of Turkey regarding exportation in recent years. International Journal of Environmental Trends, 2(2), 53–58.
4. Çamlıbel, O. (2020a). Investigation of the Physical Properties and Mechanical Properties of Hight Density Fiberboard (HDF) Board Produced with Low Mole Urea Formaldehyde Resin. In Ö. C. Hergül & P. Göker (Eds.), 3rd. International Congress of Academic Research (pp. 629–635). Asos Press.
5. Çamlıbel, O. (2020b). Investigation of the Physical Some Properties of HDF Boards Produced with Urea Formaldehyde Different Moles Ratios. In Ö. Çakır (Ed.), 8th International Scientific Research Congress-Science and Engineering (pp. 25–36). Asos Press.
6. Çetin, F., & Kaygın, B. (2016). Three dimensional plating of wooden fibrous composite materials by using the technique of pyrolytic plating. Journal of Bartın Faculty of Forestry, 18(1), 93–102.
7. Döngel, N., Küreli, İ., & Söğütlü, C. (2008). Kuru Sıcaklığın Ahşap ve Ahşap Esaslı Döşeme Kaplama Malzemelerinde Parlaklık ve Renk Değişimine Etkisi. Politeknik Dergisi, 11(3), 255–263.
8. Güler, C., Çöpür, Y., Taşcıoğlu, C., & Büyüksarı, Ü. (2007). Utilization potential of HDF (High Density Fiberboard) in Laminated Parquet Production. Duzce Universitesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 3(2), 16–32.
9. 10.4067/S0718-221X200600030000410.4067/S0718-221X2006000300004 ↗
10. Hızıroğlu, S. (2008). Internal Bond Strength of Laminated Flooring as Function of Water Exposure. 51st International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology, 4.
11. 10.5658/WOOD.2017.45.4.44410.5658/WOOD.2017.45.4.444 ↗
12. 10.1515/HF.2008.08310.1515/HF.2008.083 ↗
13. İstek, A. (2006). Effects of pressure and temperature on physical and mechanical properties of high density fiberboard. ZKÜ Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(10), 29–35.
14. İstek, A., Özlüsoylu, İ., & Kızılkaya, A. (2017). Turkish Wood Based Panel Sector Analysis. Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry, 19(1), 132–138.
15. Jaber, M. A., Hammadi, K. J., Karem, A. A. A., & Abd-Alrazak, M. (2016). Physical and Mechanical Properties of Medium Density Fiberboard Made of Palm Fronds and Trunks. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 4(4), 972–978.
16. Kara, M. E., Yerlikaya, Z., Ateş, S., & Olgun, Ç. (2016). Effect of pressing conditions on some surface properties of HDF laminate parquets. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 23(4), 274–278.
17. Kartal, S. N., Burdsall, H. H., & Green, F. (2003). Accidental mold/termite testing of high density fiberboard (HDF) treated with boric acid, borax and N’N-aphthoylhydroxylamine (NHA).
18. 10.1016/S0964-8305(02)00072-010.1016/S0964-8305(02)00072-0 ↗
19. Korkut, S., Çabukoğlu, F., & Özdemir, H. (2015). Effects of Post Heat-Treatment on Certain Characteristics of High Density Fiberboard. Duzce Universitesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 11(1), 83–87.
20. 10.1177/109963621769958710.1177/1099636217699587 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.01.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.01.004 ↗
22. 10.1080/00218464.2018.150028010.1080/00218464.2018.1500280 ↗
23. Mantanis, G., Athanassiadou, E., Nakos, P., & Coutinho, A. M. J. (2004). A New Process for Recycling Waste Fiberboards. In R. J. Tichy & V. Yadama (Eds.), 38th International Wood Composites Symposium (pp. 119–122). Washington State University.
24. Mihajlova, J., & Savov, V. (2018). Physical Indicators of High-Density Fibreboards (HDF) Manufactured from Wood of Hard Broadleaved Species. 8th Hardwood Conference – New Aspects of Hardwood Utilization – From Science to Technology, 142–143.
25. Nemli, G., Öztürk, I., & Aydın, A. (2004). Laminates. Artvin Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 1–2, 55–60.
26. 10.1002/app.3043510.1002/app.30435 ↗
27. Özdemir, F. (2016). Investigate on effect of dolomite mineral on some properties of high density fiberboard (HDF). KSU. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 19(2), 93–98.10.17780/ksujes.86960 ↗
28. Özdemir, F., Özyurt, H., Dalgıç, E., Ramazanoğlu, D., & Tutuş, A. (2018). Investigation of Surface Quality of High Density Fiberboard (HDF) Boards Produced by Adding Muscovite Mineral. Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 21(2), 166–171.
29. 10.18182/tjf.4052810.18182/tjf.40528 ↗
30. Özdemir, F., Tutuş, A., & Çiçekler, M. (2016). Effect of dolomite mineral on surface roughness of high density fiberboard (HDF). International Furniture Congress, 498–501.
31. Rozins, R., & Iejavs, J. (2014). Evaluation of thermal properties of wood based composite panel walls. Research for Rural Development, 2, 109–114.
32. 10.3390/POLYM1206132710.3390/POLYM12061327 ↗
33. 10.1177/002199831244650310.1177/0021998312446503 ↗
34. Suchsland, O., & Woodson, G. E. (1986). Fiberboard manufacturing practices in the United States. In USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook No 640. USDA Forest Service.
35. TS EN ISO 12460-5 (2016). Wood based panels – Determination of formaldehyde release – Part 5: Extraction method (called the perforator method).
36. TS EN 310. (1999). Wood-based panels – Determination of modulus of elasticity in bending and of bending strength.
37. TS EN 311. (2005). Wood-based panels – Surface soundness – Test method.
38. TS EN 317. (1999). Particleboards and fibreboards – Determination of swelling in thickness after immersion in water.
39. TS EN 319. (1999). Particleboards and fibreboards – Determination of tensile strength perpendicular to the plane of the board.
40. TS EN 322. (1999). Wood-based panels – Determination of moisture content.
41. TS EN 323. (1999). Wood-based panels – Determination of density.
42. TS EN 324-1. (1999). Wood-based panels – Determination of dimensions of boards – Part 1: Determination of thickness, width and length.
43. TS EN 382-1. (1999). Fibreboards – Determination of surface absorption part 1: Test method for dry process fibreboards.
44. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.106610.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1066 ↗