Effect of Wood-based Material Type on Drilled Hole Diameter
Source abstract
Abstract
This study examines the influence of furniture board material type on real drilled hole dimensions. Five samples were fabricated from two medium-density fibreboards (MDF), two particleboards, and plywood. Fifteen holes were drilled in the side surface of each sample using a 12 mm drill bit, a rotational speed of 3000 rpm, and a feed rate of 0.67 mm/rev. For each hole, the diameter of the cylindrical plug gauge was identified to determine whether it could be inserted freely, partially, or not at all. The results showed that in each case the effective hole diameter was smaller than the nominal drill diameter. The smallest plug gauge diameters were observed in plywood (a plug gauge with a diameter exceeding 98.8% of the drill bit diameter could not be freely inserted). Particleboards exhibited varying usable hole diameters (99.2-99.6%), while MDF showed the largest diameters of freely insertable plug gauge (99.6%). The observed differences between the plug gauge diameter and the nominal drill bit diameter can be attributed to variations in material structure. Adhesive layers in plywood and structural changes induced by drilling in particleboard likely contribute to the reduced practical hole diameter. In contrast, MDF's more uniform structure results in minimal deviations. These differences in hole diameter are crucial for the design of self-assembly furniture, as they can impact the fit and assembly process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Materials Engineering and Processing · Wood Treatment and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Ballast, D. K. (2007). Handbook of construction tolerances (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Handbook+of+Construction+Tolerances%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9780471931515.
2. 10.15376/biores.14.1.180-19210.15376/biores.14.1.180-192 ↗
3. 10.3390/f1411225410.3390/f14112254 ↗
4. 10.3390/f1509160010.3390/f15091600 ↗
5. 10.3390/f1307104510.3390/f13071045 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00170-018-1920-210.1007/s00170-018-1920-2 ↗
7. 10.1201/b1773510.1201/b17735 ↗
8. DoP. (2023). Deklaracja właściwości użytkowych sklejki / Declaration of Performance—DoP of Plywood (Declaration of Performance - DoP 2/2023; p. 3). Sklejka-Eko SA. https://www.sklejkaeko.pl/pobierz/certyfikaty/.
9. Eckelman, C. A. (1998). The Shrinking and Swelling of Wood and its Effect on Furniture (FNR 163; Forestry & Natural Resources, p. 26). Purdue University. Department of Forestry & Natural Resource. https://extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/FNR/FNR-163.pdf.
10. Eckelman, C. A., Haviarova, E., Kasal, A., & Erdil, Y. Z. (2017). Lower tolerance limit approach to equation-based rational design values for L-shaped mortise and tenon joints. Wood and Fiber Science, 49(2), 219–230. Scopus.
11. 10.22616/rrd.26.2020.03410.22616/rrd.26.2020.034 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00226-022-01395-w10.1007/s00226-022-01395-w ↗
13. 10.3390/f1302024210.3390/f13020242 ↗
14. 10.1080/00207549719527210.1080/002075497195272 ↗
15. 10.3390/f1306093310.3390/f13060933 ↗
16. 10.17423/afx.2021.63.2.0410.17423/afx.2021.63.2.04 ↗
17. 10.3390/f1509161210.3390/f15091612 ↗
18. 10.3390/polym1608104510.3390/polym16081045 ↗
19. PDS. (2022). Płyty wiórowe surowe / Raw particleboards (p. 8) [Product data sheet]. Swiss Krono. https://www.swisskrono.com/pl-pl/produkty/produkty-meblowe/plyty-wiorowe/#/.
20. PDS. (2023a). Eurospan E1 P2 CE EAC (Technical Datasheet Rec.: 107; p. 2). Egger Brilon GmbH & CO. KG. https://www.egger.com/get_download/6603a8d4-4c68-446d-b77a-193672c87f5a/Technical_datasheet_E1_P2_CE_TD-107_English.pdf.
21. PDS. (2023b). MDF E1E05 TSCA ST CE EAC (Technical Datasheet Rec.: 504; p. 2). Egger Brilon GmbH & CO. KG. https://www.egger.com/get_download/b0413715-e3c8-4957-8945-346dd1b73c1e/Technical_datasheet_E1E05_TSCA_ST_CE_TD-504_English.pdf.
22. PDS. (2023c). Płyty MDF, LDF, HDF / MDF, LDF, HDF Boards (p. 8) [Product data sheet]. Swiss Krono. https://www.swisskrono.com/pl-pl/produkty/produkty-meblowe/plyty-mdf/#/languageModal.
23. 10.3390/f1210133410.3390/f12101334 ↗
24. 10.1023/A:102016491851210.1023/A:1020164918512 ↗
25. Porankiewicz, B. (2014). Wood machining investigations: Parameters to consider for thorough experimentation. BioResources, 9(2), 4–7.10.15376/biores.9.1.4-7 ↗
26. Porankiewicz, B., & Wieloch, G. (2008). Drill wear during the boring of particle board: A multi-factor analysis including effects of mineral contaminants. BioResources, 3(2), 425–436.10.15376/biores.3.2.425-436 ↗
27. 10.15376/biores.16.3.5407-542110.15376/biores.16.3.5407-5421 ↗
28. 10.3390/ma1605205310.3390/ma16052053 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00107-023-01972-110.1007/s00107-023-01972-1 ↗
30. 10.15376/biores.15.1.117-12910.15376/biores.15.1.117-129 ↗
31. Szwajka, K., & Trzepieciński, T. (2017). An examination of the tool life and surface quality during drilling melamine faced chipboard. Wood Research, 62(2), 307–318. Scopus.
32. 10.1007/BF0035339010.1007/BF00353390 ↗
33. 10.5604/01.3001.0015.527410.5604/01.3001.0015.5274 ↗
34. 10.15376/biores.13.3.5241-525310.15376/biores.13.3.5241-5253 ↗
35. Wilkowski, J., & Górski, J. (2011). Vibro-acoustic signals as a source of information about tool wear during laminated chipboard milling. Wood Research, 56(1), 57–66.
36. 10.3390/ma1510342010.3390/ma15103420 ↗
37. Zhou, Y., Fushitani, M., & Kamdem, D. P. (2007). Bending Creep Behavior of Medium Density Fiberboard and Particleboard During Cyclic Moisture Changes. Wood and Fiber Science, 33, 609–617.