Ecological footprint of wood-based products in the Ukrainian Carpathians region
Source abstract
Abstract
In Ukraine’s Carpathian region, the absence of research on the ecological footprint (EF) of wood products poses challenges amidst unsustainable forestry practices, climate change, and human impacts that threaten forest ecosystems and local communities. This study addresses this gap by assessing and comparing the EF of furniture boards and solid structural timber produced by two wood-processing enterprises in the Carpathians. Using the ecological footprint of production methodology based on life cycle assessment, it calculates the cumulative environmental impacts of production, use, and disposal of these products, applying global productivity and equivalency coefficients. The analysis distinguishes between direct and indirect EFs: direct EF covers land use for forest resources and other areas, while indirect considers the land required to absorb CO2 emissions from production. Findings reveal that the total EF for producing 1 m³ of furniture boards at enterprise “A” requires 0.475 ha, while structural timber at enterprise “B” needs only 0.111 ha, underscoring the different environmental impacts. A primary contributor to the EF is heat energy for drying lumber, generated by burning wood waste. Offsetting CO2 emissions from this process requires 0.353 ha/m³ of land for furniture boards and 0.088 ha/m³ - for structural timber. Additionally, electricity consumption for machinery adds 0.081 ha/m³ for furniture boards and 0.011 ha/m³ for structural timber. Transport emissions further increase the EF, with 0.026 ha/m³ required for furniture boards and 0.002 ha/m³ for structural timber. These results highlight the need for enhanced resource efficiency to mitigate environmental impacts, particularly in heat generation and transportation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diverse Scientific Research in Ukraine · Economic and Business Development Strategies · Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Abd’Razack N., bin Muhamad Ludin, A. [2013]: Wood Fuel Consumption and Ecological Footprint of African Cities. International Journal of Education and Research 1(2): 1-18.
2. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.10.00510.1016/j.ecolind.2014.10.005 ↗
3. Atomic energy in Ukraine and the world [2008]: Climate change. Retried from: https://atom.org.ua/?p=359.
4. Brown S., Jayant S., Cannell M., Kauppi P. [1996]: Mitigation of Carbon Emissions to the Atmosphere by Forest Management. Commonwealth Forestry Review 75(1), 80-91.
5. 10.1007/s11367-013-0611-310.1007/s11367-013-0611-3 ↗
6. Chambers N., Lewis K. [2001]: Ecological Footprint Analysis: Towards a Sustainability Indicator for Business. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. Research Report No 65. Certified Account Educational Trust, London.
7. Chambers N., Simmons C., Wackernagel M. [2000]: Sharing Nature’s Interest. Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability. Earthscan, London.
8. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.11180910.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111809 ↗
9. Chomkhamsri K., Pelletier N. [2011]: Analysis of existing environmental footprint methodologies for products and organizations: recommendations, rationale, and alignment. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, 61.
10. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.00910.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.009 ↗
11. Chernyavskyy M., Soloviy I., Henyk Ya., Kaspruk O., Henyk O., Melnykovych M., Herasym H., Savka V. [2011]: Problems of Local Population Legal Assess to Forest Resources and Illegal Logging in Forests of the Carpathians and the West Polissia. Green Cross Society, Liga-Press, Lviv, Ukraine.
12. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.01310.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013 ↗
13. Cosola G., Grigolato S., Ackerman P., Monterotti S., Cavalli R. [2016]: Carbon footprint of forest operations under different management regimes. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 37(1): 201-217.
14. 10.1080/02827581.2016.125942410.1080/02827581.2016.1259424 ↗
15. FAO [2000]: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). Global Agro-Ecological Zones. Retried from: http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/gaez/index.html.
16. 10.1162/10881980677554533010.1162/108819806775545330 ↗
17. Galli A., Kitzes J., Wermer P., Wackernagel M., Niccolucci V., Tiezzi E. [2007]: An exploration of the mathematics behind the Ecological Footprint. Ecodynamics 2: 249-257.10.2495/ECO-V2-N4-250-257 ↗
18. Global Footprint Network [2009]: Ecological Footprint Standards. Retried from: https://www.footprintnetwork.org/content/images/uploads/Ecological_Footprint_Standards_2009.pdf.
19. Global Footprint Network [2024]: Free Public Data Set. Retried from: https://www.footprintnetwork.org.
20. Golubets M., Hnativ P., Kozlovskyi M. [2007]: Conceptual principles of sustainable development of the mountain region. Lviv, Ukraine.
21. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.04010.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.040 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.12210.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.122 ↗
23. Henyk O., Melnykovych M., Henyk Ya., Kaspruk O. [2011]: Socio-economic causes and consequences of unauthorized forest cuts and their impact on welfare of local communities. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU 21(19): 113-117.
24. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.02810.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.028 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.07710.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.077 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.14810.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.148 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.02910.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.029 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.02610.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.026 ↗
29. Hoekstra A. [2008]: The water footprint of food. Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, the Netherlands. Retried from: https://www.waterfootprint.org/resources/Hoekstra-2008-WaterfootprintFood.pdf.
30. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.01710.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.017 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.10110.1016/j.rser.2013.08.101 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.01910.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.019 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.09.01410.1016/j.ecolind.2008.09.014 ↗
34. Krynytskyy H., Chernyavskyy M. [2014]: Close to nature and multifunctional forest management in the Carpathian region of Ukraine and Slovakia. Forza, Uzhhorod, Ukraine.
35. 10.1080/71367670010.1080/713676700 ↗
36. 10.15421/41231210.15421/412312 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.02010.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.020 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.04010.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.040 ↗
39. Melnykovych M., Soloviy I. [2014]: Contribution of forestry to the well-being of mountain forest dependent communities in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Proceedings of the forestry academy of sciences of Ukraine 12: 233-241.
40. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.04110.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.041 ↗
41. News of the Ukrainian Energy Exchange [2022]: Features of domestic electricity production. Retried from: https://www.ueex.com.ua/presscenter/news/osoblivosti-vitchiznyanogo-virobnitstva-elektroenergii/.
42. 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.11.00310.1016/j.forpol.2009.11.003 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.agee.2008.05.01510.1016/j.agee.2008.05.015 ↗
44. 10.15421/41161210.15421/411612 ↗
45. 10.5070/G3191032410.5070/G31910324 ↗
46. Pelyukh O., Soloviy I., Kiyko O., Ilkiv M., Chelepis T., Lavnyy V. [2023]: Product biodiversity footprint: theory and estimation methodology. Proceedings of the forestry academy of sciences of Ukraine 25: 156-166.
47. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.03310.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.033 ↗
48. Poliakova L, Abruscato S. [2022]: Supporting the recovery and sustainable management of Ukrainian forests and its forest sector. Forest Europe, Bonn, Germany, 31 p.
49. 10.1007/s10668-023-03571-910.1007/s10668-023-03571-9 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.22710.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.227 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.00610.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.006 ↗
52. Sgarbossa A., Boschiero M., Pierobon F., Cavalli R., Zanetti M. [2020]: Comparative life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from different wood pellet supply chains. Forests, 11(11), 1127. DOI: doi.org/10.3390/f11111127.10.3390/f11111127 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.02310.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.023 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.02710.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.027 ↗
55. Soloviy I, Chernyavsky M. [2011]: Environmental, Economic and Social Impact of Inefficient and Unsustainable Forest Practices and Illegal Logging in Ukraine. Green Cross Society, Liga-Press, Lviv, Ukraine.
56. State Forest Resources Agency of Ukraine [2022]: Public report of the head of the State Forest Resources Agency of Ukraine for 2021. Retried from: https://forest.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/8/ss-2022-en-zvedena.pdf.
57. State Statistics Committee of Ukraine [2011]: On the approval of the Methodology for calculating emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gasses into the air from the use of fuel for household needs in households. Retried from: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/metod_polog/metod_doc/2011/98/metod.htm.
58. Stoyko S. [1998]: Virgin ecosystems of the Carpathians and their significance for biological diversity conservation and maintenance of the sustainable development of forestry. Issues of sustainable development in the Carpathian region, 2, 142–148.
59. 10.1080/02827581.2011.62962210.1080/02827581.2011.629622 ↗
60. 10.3390/su1508696710.3390/su15086967 ↗
61. The Main Department of Statistics of the Ternopil region [2024]: Calculation of emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases into the atmosphere when burning natural gas, fuel oil, hard or brown coal. Retried from: https://www.te.ukrstat.gov.ua/files/respondent/2tp.pdf.
62. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.02610.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.026 ↗
63. Volchyn I., Chernyavskyi M., Bondarenko V. [2013]: Energy: history, modernity and future. Kyiv 264 p.
64. Wackernagel M., Rees W. [1996]: Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers, Canada.
65. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.11.00710.1016/j.biombioe.2004.11.007 ↗
66. Zhyla T., Soloviy I., Zhyla A., Volosyanchuk R. [2018]. Mountain communities' households Dependency on Provisioning Forest Ecosystem Services: The Case Of Ukrainian Carpathians. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Forestry, Wood Industry, Agricultural Food Engineering. Series II, 11(2), 63-80. - webbut2.unitbv.ro/bu2018/series ii/2018/BULETIN I/06_Zhyla.pdf.