The Influence of Selected Physico-Chemical Pretreatment Methods on Chemical Composition and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Yield of Poplar Wood and Corn Stover
Source abstract
Abstract
In the paper, three different physico-chemical pretreatment methods in relation to bioethanol production were compared.The wood of fast-growing poplar species (Populus deltoides x maximowiczii and Populus trichocarpa Torr.& A. Gray ex Hook) and corn stover were used as a feedstock.The chemical composition and enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of the biomass before and after pretreatments were compared.On the basis of the results, it was concluded that the applied pretreatments changed the chemical composition of the raw materials.In the case of the acid and LHW (liquid hot water pretreatment) methods, up to 93.7% of hemicelluloses (especially pentosans) were removed.From among the selected pretreatment methods, the LHW and alkaline methods occurred to be the most interesting.Nevertheless, from the bioethanol production point of view, the LHW process of Populus deltoides x maximowiczii wood was the best because after enzymatic hydrolysis, high amounts of glucose (up to 600.9 mg/g pretreated biomass) and minor amounts of xylose (up to 37.9 mg/g pretreated biomass) were produced.Moreover, based on the chemical composition and sugar profile analysis, it was proved that the Populus trichocarpa wood also has a high potential for bioethanol production.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bioenergy crop production and management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Adney B., Baker J. [1996]: Measurement of cellulase activities (NREL/TP-510-42628). National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
2. 10.15199/62.2018.11.1010.15199/62.2018.11.10 ↗
3. 10.12841/wood.1644-3985.367.0910.12841/wood.1644-3985.367.09 ↗
4. 10.5604/01.3001.0015.363310.5604/01.3001.0015.3633 ↗
5. 10.15376/biores.16.3.5618-562710.15376/biores.16.3.5618-5627 ↗
6. 10.5604/01.3001.0014.886110.5604/01.3001.0014.8861 ↗
7. Alvira P., Tomas-Pejo E., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J. [2010]: Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review.
8. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.09310.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093 ↗
9. 10.15376/biores.13.4.8629-864510.15376/biores.13.4.8629-8645 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00226-021-01350-110.1007/s00226-021-01350-1 ↗
11. Antczak A., Świerkosz R., Szeniawski M., Marchwicka M., Akus-Szylberg F., Przybysz P., Zawadzki J. [2019]: The comparison of acid and enzymatic hydrolysis of pulp.
12. 10.12841/wood.1644-3985.D0710.12841/wood.1644-3985.D07 ↗
13. 10.15199/62.2016.9.2310.15199/62.2016.9.23 ↗
14. 10.3389/FENRG.2018.0014110.3389/FENRG.2018.00141 ↗
15. Bodîrlău R., Teacă C. A., Spiridon I. [2008]: Chemical modification of beech wood: effect on thermal stability. BioResources 3 [3]: 789-800.10.15376/biores.3.3.789-800 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.07.00910.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.07.009 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.10.05510.1016/j.fuel.2013.10.055 ↗
18. Dąbkowska K., Chmielewska I., Pilarek M., Szewczyk K. W. [2012]: Wpływ metody wstępnej obróbki surowca lignocelulozowego na efektywność hydrolizy enzymatycznej. Inżynieria i Aparatura Chemiczna 51[4]: 112-114.
19. 10.2478/eces-2020-000210.2478/eces-2020-0002 ↗
20. 10.3923/BIOTECH.2014.1.2110.3923/BIOTECH.2014.1.21 ↗
21. 10.15255/CABEQ.2016.91310.15255/CABEQ.2016.913 ↗
22. Fengel D., Wegener G. [2003]: Wood. Chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions. VK, Remagen.
23. Gawron J., Antczak A., Borysiak S., Zawadzki J., Kupczyk A. [2014]: The study of glucose and xylose content by acid hydrolysis of ash wood (Fraxinus excelsior L.) after thermal modification in nitrogen by HPLC method. BioResources 9: 3197-3210.10.15376/biores.9.2.3197-3210 ↗
24. 10.1007/s12010-017-2541-110.1007/s12010-017-2541-1 ↗
25. Janga K.K., Hägg M-B., Moe S.T. [2012]: Influence of acid concentration, temperature, and time on decrystallization in two-stage concentrated sulfuric acid hydrolysis of pinewood and aspen wood: a statistical approach. BioResources 7[1]: 391-411.10.15376/biores.7.1.391-411 ↗
26. 10.1186/1754-6834-6-1610.1186/1754-6834-6-16 ↗
27. Kačik F., Solár R. [1999]: Analiticka chemia dreva. TU, Zwoleń.
28. 10.1002/ceat.20100035710.1002/ceat.201000357 ↗
29. 10.1021/ie801542g10.1021/ie801542g ↗
30. 10.1007/3-540-49194-5_510.1007/3-540-49194-5_5 ↗
31. 10.1371/journal.pone.009545510.1371/journal.pone.0095455 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10086-009-1040-610.1007/s10086-009-1040-6 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.01810.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.018 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.02510.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.03110.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.031 ↗
36. Prosiński S. [1984]: Wood Chemistry. State Agricultural and Forest Publishing House, Warsaw.
37. Seifert K. [1960]: Zur frage der cellulose-schnellbestimmung nach der acetylaceton-methode. Das Papier 14[3]: 104-106.
38. Shi Y., Yokoyama T., Akiyama T., Yashiro M., Matsumoto Y. [2012]: Degradation kinetics of monosaccharides in hydrochloric, sulfuric and sulfurous acid. BioResources 7 [3]: 4085-4097.10.15376/biores.7.3.4085-4097 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0341910.1021/acsomega.0c03419 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.03710.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.037 ↗
41. Sluiter A., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluiter J., Templeton D. [2008]: Determination of extractives in biomass (NREL/TP-510-42619). National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
42. 10.2298/CICEQ130911035S10.2298/CICEQ130911035S ↗
43. Szadkowski J. [2019]: Changes of porous structure and chemical composition of poplar wood (Populus sp.) after physicochemical treatment. Praca doktorska, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego, Warsaw.
44. Tomás-Pejó E., Alvira P., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J. [2011]: Pretreatment technologies for lignocellulose-to-bioethanol conversion, Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam.
45. 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.01610.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.016 ↗
46. 10.1007/BF0022905210.1007/BF00229052 ↗
47. 10.32604/jrm.2019.0773510.32604/jrm.2019.07735 ↗
48. 10.1186/s13068-015-0422-910.1186/s13068-015-0422-9 ↗
49. 10.1007/s12257-014-0658-410.1007/s12257-014-0658-4 ↗
50. 10.1016/J.INDCROP.2020.11214510.1016/J.INDCROP.2020.112145 ↗
51. 10.15199/62.2015.4.2010.15199/62.2015.4.20 ↗
52. Wise L.E., Murphy M., D'Addieco A.A. [1946]: Chlorite holocellulose, its fractionation and bearing on summative wood analysis and on studies on the hemicelluloses. Paper Trade Journal 122: 35-43.
53. 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2020.12284810.1016/J.BIORTECH.2020.122848 ↗
54. Zawadzki J., Radomski A., Antczak A., Kupczyk A. [2016]: Nowoczesne aspekty badawcze związane z otrzymywaniem bioetanolu z biomasy lignocelulozowej (Modern research aspects of obtaining bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass). In: Karpiński S. (ed.), Wyniki wybranych badań przeprowadzonych w ramach projektu WOODTECH (Results of selected studies carried out within WOODTECH project). Oficyna Wydawniczo-Poligraficzna ADAM, Warszawa.
55. 10.1038/s41598-018-19517-510.1038/s41598-018-19517-5 ↗