journal article·2023-07-14Open access

The Role of Fugitive Hydrogen Emissions in Selecting Hydrogen Carriers

Indranil Dutta, Rajesh Kumar Parsapur, Sudipta Chatterjee, Amol M. Hengne, Davin Tan, Karthik Peramaiah, Theis I. Solling, Ole John Nielsen, Kuo-Wei Huang

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 8· Issue 7

Abstract

G lobal energy demand has been increasing drastically due to rapid population growth and economic development, more than tripling from 4242 million tons of oil equivalent per year (Mtoes/yr) in 1971 to 14,314 Mtoes/yr in 2018. 1 More than 80% of the total global energy is derived from fossil fuels, in the forms of oil, coal, and natural gas (NG). 2 Hydrocarbons as an energy source is finite, and this constitutes one very obvious incentive in identifying alternatives.Another and perhaps more pressing reason is that the increase in anthropomorphic activities and the dependence on fossil fuels has led to an alarming increase in carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentration in the atmosphere (currently approximately 420 ppm), which could impact the global climate. 3To curtail CO 2 emissions, a range of lowcarbon resources, including geothermal, solar-, wind-, tidal-, hydropower, etc., have been proposed as viable alternatives.However, their large-scale implementation requires proper energy storage and carrying systems due to the inconsistent availability of local renewable resources and their intrinsic intermittency. 4 In this context, hydrogen (H 2 ) is often considered the most promising clean energy carrier to diversify and alleviate the dependence on fossil fuels, one of the key decarbonizing strategies to achieve the goals set by the Paris Agreement. 5Predicted projections by the International Energy Agency's (IEA) net zero emission and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) SR1.5 scenarios showed that by 2050, the consumption of H 2 -based fuels may reach 18-33 exajoules (EJ = 10 18 J), corresponding to a potential reduction of CO 2 emissions by 4 Gt. 6 The strong demand for H 2 growth and the adoption of cleaner technologies for its production is expected to mitigate up to 60 Gt of CO 2 emissions from 2021 to 2050, representing 6% of the total reduction in cumulative emissions. 7This prospect has spurred several nations to announce ambitious projects, numerous targets, and policy incentives to decarbonize their energy sectors with a keen focus on developing sustainable H 2 technologies. 1,8,9As H 2 has a quintessential role in helping to tackle climate change, significant efforts and resources have been devoted toward developing suitable hydrogen technologies with proper infrastructures and large-scale applications.In the fervent migration from a fossil fuel-based economy toward a low-carbon hydrogen future, a vital but often overlooked process is the fugitive emission (FE, representing unanticipated leaks) which will have a significant impact at the industrial scale.H 2 is a small molecule that readily escapes and disperses into the atmosphere.As H 2 is very flammable in air
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Catalysts for Methane Reforming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

KAUST Catalysis Center and Division of Physical Science and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia

Department of Chemistry, Birla Institute of Technology and Science − Pilani, K.K. Birla Goa Campus, Zuarinagar, Goa 403726, India

Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, 2 Fusionopolis Way, Singapore 138634, Singapore

Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Institute of Sustainability for Chemicals, Energy and Environment, 1 Pesek Rd, Singapore 627833, Singapore

Center for Integrative Petroleum Research, College of Petroleum Engineering & Geoscience, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia

Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2100 København, Denmark

Funding

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology · Agency for Science, Technology and Research

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Balances: Overview. 2019. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/world-energy-balances. Accessed: 03–06–2023.
2. International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook. 2019. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019. Accessed: 03–06–2022.
3. Global Monitoring Laboratory. Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/. Accessed 03–06–2023.
4. 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.15110.1016/j.rser.2011.07.151 ↗
5. Rogelj J. · 2018
6. International Energy Agency · 202110.1787/c8328405-en ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.09.01510.1016/j.cattod.2017.09.015 ↗
8. HM Government. UK hydrogen strategy. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS): London, UK, 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-hydrogen-strategy. Accessed: 03–06–2023.
9. Qamar Energy, Hydrogen in the GCC, 2022. https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2020/12/Hydrogen%20in%20the%20GCC.pdf. Accessed: 03–06–2023.
10. Derwent, R. G. Hydrogen for heating: atmospheric impacts – a literature review. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS): London, UK. 2018. Accessed: 03–06–2023.
11. 10.5194/acp-22-9349-202210.5194/acp-22-9349-2022 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-022-35419-710.1038/s41467-022-35419-7 ↗
13. 10.1002/ese3.95610.1002/ese3.956 ↗
14. de Coninck, H.; Revi, A.; Babiker, M.; Bertoldi, P.; Buckeridge, M.; Cartwright, A.; Dong, W.; Ford, J.; Fuss, S.; Hourcade, J.C. Strengthening and implementing the global response. Global warming of 1.5° C: summary for policy makers. IPCC–The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2018. Accessed: 03–06–2023.
15. Mcfarlane, S.; Bousso, R. Has green hydrogen sprung a leak? Reuters. 2022. https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/has-green-hydrogen-sprung-leak-2022-12-22/. Accessed: 03–06–2023.
16. Warwick N. · 2022
17. Zhu, S. The Importance of Minimizing Fugitive Hydrogen Emissions, 2022. https://guidehouseinsights.com/news-and-views/the-importance-of-minimizing-fugitive-hydrogen-emissions#:~:text=Amid%20a%20global%20effort%20to,star%20in%20the%20energy%20sectorhttps://guidehouseinsights.com/news-and-views/the-importance-of-minimizing-fugitive-hydrogen-emissions#:~:text=Amid%20a%20global%20effort%20to,star%20in%20the%20energy%20sector. Accessed: 03–06–2023.
18. 10.1029/1999JD90078810.1029/1999JD900788 ↗
19. International Energy Agency. Methane and climate change. 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-methane-tracker-2023. Accessed: 03–06–2023.
20. 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2009.00416.x10.1111/j.1600-0889.2009.00416.x ↗
21. 10.1038/nature0191710.1038/nature01917 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.08810.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.088 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.12510.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.125 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.12010.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.120 ↗
25. 10.1029/2008GL03510210.1029/2008GL035102 ↗
26. 10.1088/1748-9326/aae01810.1088/1748-9326/aae018 ↗
27. Kurmayer, N. J. Scientists warn against global warming effect of hydrogen leaks. EURACTIVE, 2021. https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/scientists-warn-against-global-warming-effect-of-hydrogen-leaks/ Accessed: 03–06–2023.
28. 10.1504/IJNHPA.2006.00986910.1504/IJNHPA.2006.009869 ↗
29. IPCC · 2014 · 151
30. 10.1021/es103768g10.1021/es103768g ↗
31. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15462410.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154624 ↗
32. 10.3303/CET133115310.3303/CET1331153 ↗
33. 10.1002/jgrd.5020410.1002/jgrd.50204 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.04.00410.1016/j.joule.2020.04.004 ↗
35. Clare, J.; Kevin, F.; Peter, G.; Faisal, H.; Camel, M.; Nouaamane, K.; Andy, D.; Olivier, L.; Mures, Z.; Tristan, D.; Simeon, G.; Adam, H.; Josh, M.; Thomas, W.; Bill, D.; Ian, W. Ammonia to Green Hydrogen Project: Feasibility Study. Birmingham, 2019. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/880826/HS420_-_Ecuity_-_Ammonia_to_Green_Hydrogen.pdf. Accessed: 16–06–2023.
36. Peters M. · 2016
37. Ahluwalia R. K. · 201010.2172/973482 ↗
38. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0221910.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02219 ↗
39. 10.3390/en1421694310.3390/en14216943 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10584-011-0061-510.1007/s10584-011-0061-5 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.10.01210.1016/j.combustflame.2019.10.012 ↗
42. David, B. Ammonia: zero-carbon fertiliser, fuel and energy store, Policy briefing. The Royal Society. February 2020. https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/green-ammonia/green-ammonia-policy-briefing.pdf Accessed: 03–06–2023.
43. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0218910.1021/acsenergylett.1c02189 ↗
44. 10.3390/en1322604010.3390/en13226040 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.19910.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.199 ↗
46. Campbell, C. Hydrogen storage and fuel processing strategies. PhD Thesis, Newcastle University, 2014.
47. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.11.01410.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.11.014 ↗
48. 10.1002/anie.20140958310.1002/anie.201409583 ↗
49. Dalena F. · 2018 · 310.1016/B978-0-444-63903-5.00001-7 ↗
50. 10.3390/pr707040510.3390/pr7070405 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jcou.2020.10134910.1016/j.jcou.2020.101349 ↗
52. 10.1039/D0EE03011B10.1039/D0EE03011B ↗
53. 10.1038/s41560-019-0451-x10.1038/s41560-019-0451-x ↗
54. 10.1002/aenm.20210379910.1002/aenm.202103799 ↗