Meta‐Rod Mechanical Metamaterials With Programmable Reconfiguration
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Deformable rod‐shaped structures, such as continuum robot arms and deployable space mechanisms, provide efficient solutions that combine compact space occupation, convenient transportation, and multi‐functional reconfiguration. However, existing rod‐shaped smart structures suffer from a deficient reprogrammable space of shape transformations, limited deformation accuracy, and complex real‐time morphing control, which hinder their miniaturization, precision, and integration. This study introduces a new class of 1D mechanical metamaterials, named Meta‐rods. Activated by a single temporary axial displacement input, Meta‐rods can program and sustain large, complex deformations from rod‐shaped unit cells, including axial translation, bending, twisting, radial expansion, volumetric morphing, and their combinations. Constructed from bistable Nitinol wires, shape transformations can be locked at the mechanical stable stage without continuous maintenance control. The Meta‐rod prototypes a mapping catheter for Atrial Fibrillation treatments, demonstrating self‐sustained deployment under dynamic flow and pressure conditions. The proposed versatile framework for developing reconfigurable building blocks paves the way for advancements in 1D mechanical metamaterials with programmable shape reconfiguration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Cellular and Composite Structures · Topology Optimization in Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Industrial and Aerospace Engineering Concordia University Montreal Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11255710.1016/j.matdes.2023.112557 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10439‐008‐9606‐910.1007/s10439‐008‐9606‐9 ↗
3. 10.1109/RBME.2012.223631110.1109/RBME.2012.2236311 ↗
4. P.Kanagaratnam N.Linton B.Temelkuran et al. Multi‐Electrode CathetersWO2023199062A1 (2023).
5. 10.21037/jtd.2016.09.1310.21037/jtd.2016.09.13 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12325-017-0590-z10.1007/s12325-017-0590-z ↗
7. 10.3389/frobt.2020.0004410.3389/frobt.2020.00044 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00067-010.1016/S0020-7683(99)00067-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.media.2022.10258410.1016/j.media.2022.102584 ↗
10. Steerable Catheters in Cardiology: Classifying Steerability and Assessing Future Challenges
11. 10.1111/aor.1385110.1111/aor.13851 ↗
12. S.Amarghan “Navigation of Guidewires and Catheters During Interventional Procedures ” (Medical Instruments & Bio‐Inspired Technology 2019) https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:078e8cff‐d9bb‐417a‐b80e‐8fcac19c3b9a.
13. 10.1002/rcs.28210.1002/rcs.282 ↗
14. 10.3174/ajnr.A353010.3174/ajnr.A3530 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.370328010.1063/1.3703280 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10439‐013‐0946‐810.1007/s10439‐013‐0946‐8 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.sna.2007.03.02410.1016/j.sna.2007.03.024 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.04.00610.1016/j.plantsci.2014.04.006 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11665‐023‐08243‐310.1007/s11665‐023‐08243‐3 ↗
20. 10.1177/108128651773569510.1177/1081286517735695 ↗
21. 10.1088/2631‐7990/acf96a10.1088/2631‐7990/acf96a ↗
22. 10.3390/act1110028810.3390/act11100288 ↗
23. 10.7759/cureus.4343810.7759/cureus.43438 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467‐023‐41679‐810.1038/s41467‐023‐41679‐8 ↗
25. 10.1093/iti/liac01010.1093/iti/liac010 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.eml.2026.10245010.1016/j.eml.2026.102450 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1620670210.3390/ma16206702 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20210623110.1002/adfm.202106231 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.eml.2016.09.00110.1016/j.eml.2016.09.001 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20150280910.1002/adma.201502809 ↗
31. 10.1088/1361‐665X/ab8ea310.1088/1361‐665X/ab8ea3 ↗
32. 10.15420/aer.2021.5210.15420/aer.2021.52 ↗
33. 10.1007/s11936‐024‐01034‐610.1007/s11936‐024‐01034‐6 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.09.17710.1016/j.jacep.2017.09.177 ↗
35. A. T.Snyder Cardiac Catheter Control Using Actuator Wire University of Iowa 2017.
36. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.02.01510.1016/j.hrthm.2012.02.015 ↗
37. S.GuruandR. Z.Michael “Tackling Friction‐an Analytical Modeling Approach to Understanding Friction in Single Tendon Driven Continuum Manipulators in2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) ” (IEEE 2015):610–617.10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139242 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.02.01510.1016/j.hrthm.2012.02.015 ↗
39. 10.1161/01.CIR.99.18.241410.1161/01.CIR.99.18.2414 ↗
40. 10.1007/s11886‐999‐0074‐010.1007/s11886‐999‐0074‐0 ↗
41. 10.1007/s13239‐024‐00714‐510.1007/s13239‐024‐00714‐5 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.11232410.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112324 ↗
43. 10.3390/fluids612042810.3390/fluids6120428 ↗
44. 10.1007/s12650-019-00611-310.1007/s12650-019-00611-3 ↗
45. 10.1161/01.CIR.24.2.26710.1161/01.CIR.24.2.267 ↗
46. 10.1002/adma.20230584610.1002/adma.202305846 ↗
47. 10.1002/advs.20250792210.1002/advs.202507922 ↗
48. 10.1002/adfm.20241021710.1002/adfm.202410217 ↗
49. 10.1073/pnas.161831411410.1073/pnas.1618314114 ↗