Study on the surface fluctuation characteristics of liquid metal under gas jet excitation
Source abstract
Abstract
To address the challenge of in-situ monitoring of melt pool dynamics in laser additive manufacturing (LAM), this work proposes a gas-jet excitation method to probe surface wave behavior in liquid metals. Using an In51Bi32.5Sn16.5 alloy (melting point ≈ 60 °C), controlled airflow was applied across temperatures from 90 °C to 60 °C, and surface ripple evolution was captured via high-speed imaging. Image analysis revealed that both wave velocity and wavelength decrease markedly with cooling: stable concentric ripples form at 70 °C, while coherent waves vanish at 60 °C due to incipient solidification. Numerical simulations qualitatively reproduced the ring-like waves and keyhole-like depressions, showing trend-level consistency with the experimental observations. The findings suggest that gas-jet-excited surface-wave characteristics may provide potential observable signals for characterizing the near-solidification state of liquid metal and may offer a conceptual basis for future melt-pool monitoring methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Laser Material Processing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Armstrong M, Mehrabi H, Naveed N. An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology[J]. J Manuf Process. 2022;84:1001–29.10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.060 ↗
2. Ye DS, Shen PL, Zhang DC. etc Advantages and disadvantages of 3D printing technology compared to traditional processing technology. Civil Aircr Des Res. 2022;38(4):126–30.
3. Osipovich K, Kalashnikov K, Chumaevskii A, et al. Wire-feed electron beam additive manufacturing: A review[J]. Metals. 2023;13(2):279.10.3390/met13020279 ↗
4. Treutler K, Wesling V. The current state of research of wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM): a review[J]. Appl Sci. 2021;11(18):8619.10.3390/app11188619 ↗
5. Yao XJ, Wang JW, Yang YC. etc Exploration of Defect Generation Mechanism and Control Mechanism in Laser Additive Manufacturing of Metal Components [J]. Chin J Lasers. 2022;49(14):1402802–1402802.10.3788/CJL202249.1402802 ↗
6. Lv XR, Ma XW, Dong LH. etc Research progress on the formation mechanism and suppression methods of pores and crack defects in laser cladding layers. J Funct Materials/Gongning Cailiao. 2020;51(6):11062–9.
7. Liu HJ, Zhang BY, Zhu CC. etc Research progress on gear contact fatigue theory [J]. J Mech Eng. 2022;58(3):95–120.10.3901/JME.2022.03.095 ↗
8. Wang L, Feng S, Wang Y, et al. Porosity defects in additively manufactured metal materials: Formation mechanisms, impact on performance and regulation. Int Mater Rev. 2025;71(2):09506608251371459.10.1177/09506608251371459 ↗
9. Al-Maharma AY, Patil SP, Markert B. Effects of porosity on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured components: a critical review[J]. Mater Res Express. 2020;7(12):122001.10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d ↗
10. Ghouse S, Babu S, Van Arkel RJ, et al. The influence of laser parameters and scanning strategies on the mechanical properties of a stochastic porous material[J]. Mater Design. 2017;131:498–508.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.041 ↗
11. Herzog T, Brandt M, Trinchi A, et al. Process monitoring and machine learning for defect detection in laser-based metal additive manufacturing[J]. J Intell Manuf. 2024;35(4):1407–37.10.1007/s10845-023-02119-y ↗
12. Rao J, Leong Sing S, Liu P, et al. Non-destructive testing of metal-based additively manufactured parts and processes: a review[J]. Virtual Phys Prototy**. 2023;18(1):e2266658.10.1080/17452759.2023.2266658 ↗
13. Wang C, Zhou J, Zhang T, et al. Numerical simulation and solidification characteristics for laser cladding of Inconel 718[J]. Volume 149. Optics & laser technology; 2022. p. 107843.10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107843 ↗
14. Pajic-Lijakovic I, Milivojevic M. Marangoni effect and cell spreading[J]. Eur Biophys J. 2022;51(6):419–29.10.1007/s00249-022-01612-1 ↗
15. Saldana M, Gallegos S, Gálvez E, et al. The Reynolds number: A journey from its origin to modern applications[J]. Fluids. 2024;9(12):299.10.3390/fluids9120299 ↗
16. Lane B, Heigel J, Ricker R, et al. Measurements of melt pool geometry and cooling rates of individual laser traces on IN625 bare plates[J]. Integrating Mater Manuf Innov. 2020;9(1):16–30.10.1007/s40192-020-00169-1 ↗
17. Fotovvati B, Wayne SF, Lewis G, et al. A Review on Melt-Pool Characteristics in Laser Welding of Metals[J]. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2018;2018(1):4920718.10.1155/2018/4920718 ↗
18. Zwanenburg EA, Williams MA, Warnett JM. Review of high-speed imaging with lab-based x-ray computed tomography[J]. Meas Sci Technol. 2021;33(1):012003.10.1088/1361-6501/ac354a ↗
19. Aghajanzadeh S, Sultana A, Ziaiifar AM, et al. Formation of pores and bubbles and their impacts on the quality attributes of processed foods: a review[J]. Food Res Int. 2024;188:114494.10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114494 ↗
20. Yang J, Chen D, Qin F, et al. Melting and flowing behavior of mold flux in a continuous casting billet mold for ultra-high speed[J]. Metals. 2020;10(9):1165.10.3390/met10091165 ↗
21. Wu J. A basic guide to thermocouple measurements[J]. Texas Instruments application report; 2018.
22. Wang YH, Lee KC, Yen YF, et al. A Handheld Colorimeter for Remote and Onsite Recognition of Baking Levels at High Temperature—Pork Floss as a Case Study[J]. Food Anal Methods. 2025;18(4):606–20.10.1007/s12161-024-02740-4 ↗
23. Vavilov V, Burleigh D. Infrared thermography and thermal nondestructive testing[M]. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020.10.1007/978-3-030-48002-8 ↗
24. Brunton SL, Noack BR, Koumoutsakos P. Machine learning for fluid mechanics[J]. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2020;52(1):477–508.10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 ↗
25. Chen M, Zhang J, Qu Q, et al. Cavity-induced bubbles and pore formation of laser direct energy deposited titanium alloy: influence of powder melting degree. Additive Manuf. 2025;105:104792.10.1016/j.addma.2025.104792 ↗
26. Zhang L, Ba J, Carcione JM. Wave propagation in infinituple-porosity media[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2021, 126(4): e2020JB021266.10.1029/2020JB021266 ↗
27. Khairallah SA, Sun T, Simonds BJ. Onset of periodic oscillations as a precursor of a transition to pore-generating turbulence in laser melting[J]. Additive Manuf Lett. 2021;1:100002.10.1016/j.addlet.2021.100002 ↗
28. Keshavarzi A, Ball J, Nabavi H. Frequency pattern of turbulent flow and sediment entrainment over ripples using image processing[J]. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2012;16(1):147–56.10.5194/hess-16-147-2012 ↗
29. Balakrishna A, Lasiecka I, Webster JT. Elastic stabilization of an intrinsically unstable hyperbolic flow–structure interaction on the 3D half-space[J]. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 2023;33(03):505–45.10.1142/S0218202523500124 ↗
30. Lipchitz A, Harvel G, Sunagawa T. May 26, (2022). Thermophysical Characteristics of Liquid Metal In-Bi-Sn Eutectic (Field’s Metal) as a Similarity Coolant. ASME. ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. July 2022; 8(3): 031301. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.405363210.1115/1.4053632 ↗
31. Ojiako CJ, Cimpeanu R, Bandulasena HC. Deformation and dewetting of liquid films under gas jets[J]. J Fluid Mech. 2020;905:A18.10.1017/jfm.2020.751 ↗
32. Zamora R, Martínez-Pastor J, Faura F, Thermal. Viscoelastic and Surface Properties of Oxidized Field’s Metal for Additive Microfabrication. Materials. 2021;14:7392. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237392.10.3390/ma14237392 ↗