journal article·2026-06-16Open access

Study on the surface fluctuation characteristics of liquid metal under gas jet excitation

Da Liu, Yuhao Shen, Xuanze Wang, Shanting Ding, Zhongsheng Zhai, Zhenkun Lei, Hao Jiang, Zhenfei Guo

Discover Metals· Volume 59· Issue 1

Abstract

To address the challenge of in-situ monitoring of melt pool dynamics in laser additive manufacturing (LAM), this work proposes a gas-jet excitation method to probe surface wave behavior in liquid metals. Using an In51Bi32.5Sn16.5 alloy (melting point ≈ 60 °C), controlled airflow was applied across temperatures from 90 °C to 60 °C, and surface ripple evolution was captured via high-speed imaging. Image analysis revealed that both wave velocity and wavelength decrease markedly with cooling: stable concentric ripples form at 70 °C, while coherent waves vanish at 60 °C due to incipient solidification. Numerical simulations qualitatively reproduced the ring-like waves and keyhole-like depressions, showing trend-level consistency with the experimental observations. The findings suggest that gas-jet-excited surface-wave characteristics may provide potential observable signals for characterizing the near-solidification state of liquid metal and may offer a conceptual basis for future melt-pool monitoring methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Laser Material Processing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Armstrong M, Mehrabi H, Naveed N. An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology[J]. J Manuf Process. 2022;84:1001–29.10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.060 ↗
2. Ye DS, Shen PL, Zhang DC. etc Advantages and disadvantages of 3D printing technology compared to traditional processing technology. Civil Aircr Des Res. 2022;38(4):126–30.
3. Osipovich K, Kalashnikov K, Chumaevskii A, et al. Wire-feed electron beam additive manufacturing: A review[J]. Metals. 2023;13(2):279.10.3390/met13020279 ↗
4. Treutler K, Wesling V. The current state of research of wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM): a review[J]. Appl Sci. 2021;11(18):8619.10.3390/app11188619 ↗
5. Yao XJ, Wang JW, Yang YC. etc Exploration of Defect Generation Mechanism and Control Mechanism in Laser Additive Manufacturing of Metal Components [J]. Chin J Lasers. 2022;49(14):1402802–1402802.10.3788/CJL202249.1402802 ↗
6. Lv XR, Ma XW, Dong LH. etc Research progress on the formation mechanism and suppression methods of pores and crack defects in laser cladding layers. J Funct Materials/Gongning Cailiao. 2020;51(6):11062–9.
7. Liu HJ, Zhang BY, Zhu CC. etc Research progress on gear contact fatigue theory [J]. J Mech Eng. 2022;58(3):95–120.10.3901/JME.2022.03.095 ↗
8. Wang L, Feng S, Wang Y, et al. Porosity defects in additively manufactured metal materials: Formation mechanisms, impact on performance and regulation. Int Mater Rev. 2025;71(2):09506608251371459.10.1177/09506608251371459 ↗
9. Al-Maharma AY, Patil SP, Markert B. Effects of porosity on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured components: a critical review[J]. Mater Res Express. 2020;7(12):122001.10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d ↗
10. Ghouse S, Babu S, Van Arkel RJ, et al. The influence of laser parameters and scanning strategies on the mechanical properties of a stochastic porous material[J]. Mater Design. 2017;131:498–508.10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.041 ↗
11. Herzog T, Brandt M, Trinchi A, et al. Process monitoring and machine learning for defect detection in laser-based metal additive manufacturing[J]. J Intell Manuf. 2024;35(4):1407–37.10.1007/s10845-023-02119-y ↗
12. Rao J, Leong Sing S, Liu P, et al. Non-destructive testing of metal-based additively manufactured parts and processes: a review[J]. Virtual Phys Prototy**. 2023;18(1):e2266658.10.1080/17452759.2023.2266658 ↗
13. Wang C, Zhou J, Zhang T, et al. Numerical simulation and solidification characteristics for laser cladding of Inconel 718[J]. Volume 149. Optics & laser technology; 2022. p. 107843.10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107843 ↗
14. Pajic-Lijakovic I, Milivojevic M. Marangoni effect and cell spreading[J]. Eur Biophys J. 2022;51(6):419–29.10.1007/s00249-022-01612-1 ↗
15. Saldana M, Gallegos S, Gálvez E, et al. The Reynolds number: A journey from its origin to modern applications[J]. Fluids. 2024;9(12):299.10.3390/fluids9120299 ↗
16. Lane B, Heigel J, Ricker R, et al. Measurements of melt pool geometry and cooling rates of individual laser traces on IN625 bare plates[J]. Integrating Mater Manuf Innov. 2020;9(1):16–30.10.1007/s40192-020-00169-1 ↗
17. Fotovvati B, Wayne SF, Lewis G, et al. A Review on Melt-Pool Characteristics in Laser Welding of Metals[J]. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2018;2018(1):4920718.10.1155/2018/4920718 ↗
18. Zwanenburg EA, Williams MA, Warnett JM. Review of high-speed imaging with lab-based x-ray computed tomography[J]. Meas Sci Technol. 2021;33(1):012003.10.1088/1361-6501/ac354a ↗
19. Aghajanzadeh S, Sultana A, Ziaiifar AM, et al. Formation of pores and bubbles and their impacts on the quality attributes of processed foods: a review[J]. Food Res Int. 2024;188:114494.10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114494 ↗
20. Yang J, Chen D, Qin F, et al. Melting and flowing behavior of mold flux in a continuous casting billet mold for ultra-high speed[J]. Metals. 2020;10(9):1165.10.3390/met10091165 ↗
21. Wu J. A basic guide to thermocouple measurements[J]. Texas Instruments application report; 2018.
22. Wang YH, Lee KC, Yen YF, et al. A Handheld Colorimeter for Remote and Onsite Recognition of Baking Levels at High Temperature—Pork Floss as a Case Study[J]. Food Anal Methods. 2025;18(4):606–20.10.1007/s12161-024-02740-4 ↗
23. Vavilov V, Burleigh D. Infrared thermography and thermal nondestructive testing[M]. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020.10.1007/978-3-030-48002-8 ↗
24. Brunton SL, Noack BR, Koumoutsakos P. Machine learning for fluid mechanics[J]. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2020;52(1):477–508.10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 ↗
25. Chen M, Zhang J, Qu Q, et al. Cavity-induced bubbles and pore formation of laser direct energy deposited titanium alloy: influence of powder melting degree. Additive Manuf. 2025;105:104792.10.1016/j.addma.2025.104792 ↗
26. Zhang L, Ba J, Carcione JM. Wave propagation in infinituple-porosity media[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2021, 126(4): e2020JB021266.10.1029/2020JB021266 ↗
27. Khairallah SA, Sun T, Simonds BJ. Onset of periodic oscillations as a precursor of a transition to pore-generating turbulence in laser melting[J]. Additive Manuf Lett. 2021;1:100002.10.1016/j.addlet.2021.100002 ↗
28. Keshavarzi A, Ball J, Nabavi H. Frequency pattern of turbulent flow and sediment entrainment over ripples using image processing[J]. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2012;16(1):147–56.10.5194/hess-16-147-2012 ↗
29. Balakrishna A, Lasiecka I, Webster JT. Elastic stabilization of an intrinsically unstable hyperbolic flow–structure interaction on the 3D half-space[J]. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. 2023;33(03):505–45.10.1142/S0218202523500124 ↗
30. Lipchitz A, Harvel G, Sunagawa T. May 26, (2022). Thermophysical Characteristics of Liquid Metal In-Bi-Sn Eutectic (Field’s Metal) as a Similarity Coolant. ASME. ASME J of Nuclear Rad Sci. July 2022; 8(3): 031301. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.405363210.1115/1.4053632 ↗
31. Ojiako CJ, Cimpeanu R, Bandulasena HC. Deformation and dewetting of liquid films under gas jets[J]. J Fluid Mech. 2020;905:A18.10.1017/jfm.2020.751 ↗
32. Zamora R, Martínez-Pastor J, Faura F, Thermal. Viscoelastic and Surface Properties of Oxidized Field’s Metal for Additive Microfabrication. Materials. 2021;14:7392. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237392.10.3390/ma14237392 ↗