Facile fabrication of 3D graphene hydrogel (rGH) for enhanced removal of heavy metal Cr (VI)
Source abstract
Abstract
The reduced graphene hydrogel (rGH) was prepared by chemical reduction method, and removal performance of heavy metal Cr (VI) in static water was studied. The rGH has a three-dimensional structure and narrow pore size distribution, that the adsorption process of Cr (VI) by rGH is in accordance with Langmuir isotherm model, and the maximum adsorption capacity is 139.6 mg·g-1 .The significant adsorption capacity is mainly attributed to the fact that rGH has nano-sheet structure, and maintains the surface adsorption characteristics of graphene with rapid adsorption. The π-π action will reduce the competitive adsorption of water and increase the adsorption capacity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. [1] D. Mohan, K.P. Singh., Water Research, 36, 2304 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00447-X10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00447-X ↗
2. [2] H. Wang, X.Z. Yuan, Y. Wu, X.H. Chen, L.J. Leng, H. Wang, H. Li, G.M Zeng, Chemical Engineering Journal, 262, 597 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.02010.1016/j.cej.2014.10.020 ↗
3. [3] Yang Huang, Chaoran Li, and Zhang Lin, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 19766 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1021/am504922v10.1021/am504922v ↗
4. [4] Hongcai Gao, Yimin Sun, Jiajing Zhou, Rong Xu, and Hongwei Duan, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces5, 425 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1021/am302500v10.1021/am302500v ↗
5. [5] Yang-Xin Yu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 16267 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1021/am504452a10.1021/am504452a ↗
6. [6] Marcus A.Worsley, Thang T.Pham, Aiming Yan, Swanee J.Shin, Jonathan R.I.Lee, Michael Bagge-Hansen, William Mickelson, Alex Zettl, Nano 8(10), 11013 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1021/nn505335u10.1021/nn505335u ↗
7. [7] A. Rahim, K. Liaqat, S. Fazil et al., Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures16(3), 1147 (2021).
8. [8] Chen J W, Shi J W, Wang X, et al., Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 34, 621 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60530-010.1016/S1872-2067(12)60530-0 ↗
9. [9] Y. Li, X. C. Guo, Y. Chen, et al., Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 17(1), 21 (2022).
10. [10] Huang Z G, Zheng X Y, Lv W, et al., Langmuir, 27(12), 7558 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1021/la200606r10.1021/la200606r ↗
11. [11] Deng X J, Lü L L, Li H W, et al., Journal of Hazardous Materials, 183, 923 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.11710.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.117 ↗
12. [12] Y.H. Li, Z. Di, J. Ding, D. Wu, Z. Luan, Y. Zhu, Water Research. 39, 605 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.11.00410.1016/j.watres.2004.11.004 ↗
13. [13] S.H. Asl, M. Ahmadi, M. Ghiasvand, A. Tardast, R. Katal, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 19, 1044 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.12.00110.1016/j.jiec.2012.12.001 ↗
14. [14] V.K. Gupta, D. Pathania, S. Sharma, P. Singh, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 401, 125 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.03.02010.1016/j.jcis.2013.03.020 ↗