Novel statistically optimized one pot synthesis of inherently photoluminescent and electroactive graphene oxide nanosheets as 1, 4 dioxane sensor
Source abstract
Abstract
1, 4 dioxane predominantly found in industrial effluents and air force plants, is of great concern worldwide due to its toxic and carcinogenic nature. Currently, there are limited research on 1,4 dioxane sensors and most of these sensors are intricate metal oxide composites. This study reports the fabrication of novel inherently electroactive graphene oxide nanosheets derived from a natural polyphenolic compound, and the process parameters were statistically optimized using TOPSIS based Taguchi L9 orthogonal array. The proposed novel sensor was employed in the linear range (0.1µM to 3µM) that conforms with the WHO guideline (0.56 µM) for dioxane in water, showed good sensitivity (117 nAnM-1 cm-2 ), detection limit (20.51 nM) and quantification limit (62.16 nM) which is far superior compared to the reported literature on dioxane sensing systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Conducting polymers and applications · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. [1] K. G. Mohr Thomas, H. W. DiGuiseppi, J. K Anderson, J. W Hatton, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 549 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1201/978042940142810.1201/9780429401428 ↗
2. [2] X. Guan, F. Liu, J. Wang, C. Li, X. Zheng, Water Science and Technology 77(1), 123 (2018); https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.49810.2166/wst.2017.498 ↗
3. [3] H. M. Coleman, V. Vimonses, G. Leslie, R. Amal, Journal of Hazardous Materials 146(3), 496 (2007); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.04910.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.049 ↗
4. [4] A. Kumar, G. Vyas, M. Bhatt, S. Bhatt, P. Paul, Chemical Communications 51(88), 15936 (2015).10.1039/C5CC06744H ↗
5. [5] M. M. Rahman, M. M. Alam, A. M. Asiri, RSC advances 9(72), 42050 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA09118A10.1039/C9RA09118A ↗
6. [6] M. Coros, F. Pogacean, L. Magerusan, C. Socaci, S. Pruneanu, Frontiers of Material Science 13(1), 23 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-019-0452-510.1007/s11706-019-0452-5 ↗
7. [7] S. Rao, J. Upadhyay, K. Polychronopoulou, R. Umer, R. Das, Journal of Composites Science 2(2), 25 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs202002510.3390/jcs2020025 ↗
8. [8] Z. Zhang, H. C. Schniepp, D. H. Adamson, Carbon 154, 510 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.07.10310.1016/j.carbon.2019.07.103 ↗
9. [9] P. D. Priya Swetha, H. Manisha, K. Sudhakaraprasad, Particle and Particle Systems Characterization 35(8), 1800105 (2018); https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ppsc.20180010510.1002/ppsc.201800105 ↗
10. [10] T. Devasena, B. Iffath, R. Renjith Kumar, N. Muninathan, K. Baskaran, T. Srinivasan, S. T. John, Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications 2022(2), 1-21 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/434814910.1155/2022/4348149 ↗
11. [11] L. Sun, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 27(10), 2251 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2019.05.00310.1016/j.cjche.2019.05.003 ↗
12. [12] L. Qian, A. R. Thiruppathi, R. Elmahdy, J. Van der Zalm, A. Chen, Sensors 20(5), 1252 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3390/s2005125210.3390/s20051252 ↗
13. [13] Q. Zeng, H. Dong, X. Wang, T. Yu, W. Cui, Journal of hazardous materials 331, 88 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.04010.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.040 ↗
14. [14] T. K. Sana Fathima, A. Banu, T. Devasena, S. Ramaprabhu, RSC advances 12(30), 19375 (2022).10.1039/D2RA01789J ↗
15. [15] B. Simsek, T. Yusuf, E. H. Simsek, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 125, 18-32 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.03.01210.1016/j.chemolab.2013.03.012 ↗
16. [16] Y. Kuo, T. Yang, G. W. Huang, Engineering Optimization 40(6), 517 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215070185764510.1080/03052150701857645 ↗
17. [17] T. Yang, P. Chou, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 68(1), 9 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2004.09.00410.1016/j.matcom.2004.09.004 ↗
18. [18] K. I. Priyadarsini, Molecules 19(12), 20091 (2014); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules19122009110.3390/molecules191220091 ↗
19. [19] T. Esatbeyoglu, K. Ulbrich, C. Rehberg, S. Rohn, G. Rimbach, Food & function 6(3), 887 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1039/c4fo00790e10.1039/C4FO00790E ↗
20. [20] H. Korucu, B. Şimşek, A. Yartasi, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 43(11), 6033 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3184-410.1007/s13369-018-3184-4 ↗
21. [21] H. Korucu, B. Simsek, A. B. Guvenc, V. A. Kucuk, Vibrational Spectroscopy 104, 102967 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2019.10296710.1016/j.vibspec.2019.102967 ↗
22. [22] N. Kumar, S. Das, C. Bernhard, G. D. Varma, Superconductor Science and Technology 26(9), 095008 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/26/9/09500810.1088/0953-2048/26/9/095008 ↗
23. [23] P. Dakshinamoorthy, S. Vaithilingam, RSC advances 7(56), 34922 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA04525E10.1039/C7RA04525E ↗
24. [24] C. H. Manoratne, S. Rosa, I. R. Kottegoda, Material Science Research India, 14(1), 19 (2017); http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/msri/14010410.13005/msri/140104 ↗
25. [25] W. H. Zhang, P. P. He, S. Wu, J. Xu, Y. Li, G. Zhang, X. Y. Wei, Applied Catalysis A: General, 509, 111 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2015.10.03810.1016/j.apcata.2015.10.038 ↗
26. [26] J. I. Paredes, S. Villar-Rodil, A. Martínez-Alonso, J. M. Tascon, Langmuir 24(19), 10560 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1021/la801744a10.1021/la801744a ↗
27. [27] P. Sehrawat, S. S. Islam, P. Mishra, S. Ahmad, Scientific reports 8(1), 1 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21686-210.1038/s41598-018-21686-2 ↗
28. [28] B. Iffath, R. Renjithkumar, T. Devasena, Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 18(1), 183-193 (2023); https://doi.org/10.15251/DJNB.2023.181.18310.15251/DJNB.2023.181.183 ↗