journal article·2025-07-15Open access

Expanding the spectral responsiveness of photodetectors via the integration of TiO2 and Y2O3 quantum dots prepared by laser ablation in liquid

Applied Physics Department, College of Applied Science,University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq, M. A. Ali, G. Z. Alwan, Physics Department, Faculty of Science Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq

Abstract

This research aims to improve the performance of photo detectors by fabricating and evaluating three types of Nano detectors based on titanium oxide (TiO₂) and yttrium oxide (Y2O3) using the laser ablation technique. The detectors were prepared according to the following compositions: Ag/ TiO₂ / n-Si/Ag, Ag/ Y2O3 / n-Si/Ag, Ag/ TiO₂ / Y2O3/n-Si/Ag, and were studied using XRD, FESEM, AFM, UV-Vis, FTIR, in addition to evaluating their performance through measurements of specific detectivity (D*) and spectral response (R). The results showed that the combination of TiO₂ and Y2O3in the Ag/ TiO₂/ Y2O3/n-Si/Ag detector performed the best in terms of specific detectivity and spectral response in (Ultraviolet, Visible and Near Infrared) range, making it the most efficient from other detectors. Its superiority is due to the cumulative effect of incorporating TiO₂ and Y2O3, which reduced the effective energy gap and improved the efficiency of photon absorption and electron transfer. Although TiO₂ showed good UV and NIR absorption but it has low absorption in the visible spectrum owing to its broad energy gap of 3.3 eV when used alone. The detector based on Y2O3alone in the Ag / Y2O3/n-Si/Ag did not yield significant improvement compared to the combination of TiO₂ and Y2O3in the Ag/ TiO₂/ Y2O3/n-Si/Ag detector, highlighting the role of Y2O3as a key material in enhancing the performance of photodetectors. This study confirms that yttrium oxide (Y2O3) is a promising material for the fabrication of highly efficient photodetectors due to its unique electronic and optical properties, which increases the sensitivity of the photodetector in (visible and near infrared) range. The outcomes also show that laser ablation technique is an effective approach for preparing nanomaterials with high precision, which enhances their structural and optical properties. Given these results, it may be recommended that amalgamation of TiO₂ and Y₂O₃ be adopted as a base material in the design of future photodetectors, with additional processing techniques being explored to improve the performance of TiO₂ and reduce its recombination rates. This study also opens up new avenues for the development of advanced nanophotodetectors with novel fabrication techniques, enhancing their applications in the fields of environmental sensing, optical communications, and advanced electronic.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. [1] Z. Li et al., Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 28, no. 16, p. 1705237, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20170523710.1002/adfm.201705237 ↗
2. [2] M. A. Darwish, W. Abd-Elaziem, A. Elsheikh, and A. A. Zayed, Nanoscale Adv., 2024; https://doi.org/10.1039/D4NA00214H10.1039/D4NA00214H ↗
3. [3] Z.-C. Su and C.-F. Lin, 2023 IEEE Silicon Photonics Conference (SiPhotonics), 2023, pp. 1- 2; https://doi.org/10.1109/SiPhotonics55903.2023.1014194510.1109/SiPhotonics55903.2023.10141945 ↗
4. [4] K. Singh, N. Berwal, I. Rawal, S. Dahiya, R. Punia, R. Dhar, J. Alloys Compd., vol. 768, pp. 978-990, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.30310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.303 ↗
5. [5] Y. Ajiki et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 108, no. 15, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.494569010.1063/1.4945690 ↗
6. [6] K. S. R. Bapathi, M. F. Abdelbar, W. Jevasuwan, P. H. Borse, S. Badhulika, N. Fukata, Nano Energy, vol. 122, p. 109277, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.10927710.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109277 ↗
7. [7] C. Ling et al., J. Mater. Chem. C, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 2049-2059, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TC05604B10.1039/D1TC05604B ↗
8. [8] S. Bansal et al., Nanotechnology, vol. 31, no. 40, p. 405205, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab9da810.1088/1361-6528/ab9da8 ↗
9. [9] M. Shim, P. Guyot-Sionnest, Nature, vol. 407, no. 6807, pp. 981-983, 2000; https://doi.org/10.1038/3503957710.1038/35039577 ↗
10. [10] K. R. Chauhan, D. B. Patel, J. Alloys Compd., vol. 792, pp. 968-975, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.11110.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.111 ↗
11. [11] X. Chen et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 9, no. 42, pp. 36997-37005, 2017; https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0981210.1021/acsami.7b09812 ↗
12. [12] T. Xie et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 107, no. 24, 2015; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493812910.1063/1.4938129 ↗
13. [13] Sahar Issa Saeed , Maryam Azher Ali , Wedian K. Abad, Ahmed N. Abd, International Journal of Nanoscience ,Vol. 23, No. 2 (2024) 2350063; https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219581X2350063110.1142/S0219581X23500631 ↗
14. [14] Z. Long et al., Adv. Electron. Mater., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 1901048, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.20190104810.1002/aelm.201901048 ↗
15. [15] Z. Ma, J. Zhang, H. Lyu, X. Ping, L. Pan, Y. Shi, Metal Oxides for Optoelectronics and Optics-Based Medical Applications, Elsevier, 2022, pp. 117-150; https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85824-3.00011-710.1016/B978-0-323-85824-3.00011-7 ↗
16. [16] K. C. S. Reddy, P. Sahatiya, I. Santos-Sauceda, O. Cortázar, R. Ramírez-Bon, Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 513, p. 145804, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14580410.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145804 ↗
17. [17] X. Ma, L. Tang, Y. Zhang, W. Zuo, K. S. Teng, G. Wu, Infrared Phys. Technol., vol. 139, p. 105305, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2024.10530510.1016/j.infrared.2024.105305 ↗
18. [18] Y. S. M. Elzawiei, A. Abdulhameed, M. R. Hashim, M. M. Halim, Opt. Mater. (Amst)., vol. 144, p. 114353, 2023; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2023.11435310.1016/j.optmat.2023.114353 ↗
19. [19] Y. Shehu, S. A. M. Samsuri, N. M. Ahmed, S. Aslam, Optik (Stuttg)., vol. 304, p. 171784, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2024.17178410.1016/j.ijleo.2024.171784 ↗
20. [20] I. H. Kadhim and N. M. Abd-Alghafour, J. Coll. Basic Educ., vol. 30, no. 126, pp. 104-115, 2024; https://doi.org/10.35950/cbej.v30i126.1222910.35950/cbej.v30i126.12229 ↗
21. [21] X. Zhang, H. Yang, A. Tang, J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 112, no. 51, pp. 16271-16279, 2008; https://doi.org/10.1021/jp806820p10.1021/jp806820p ↗
22. [22] C. Liu, P. Huang, W. Wang, M. Tan, F. Fu, Y. Feng, Polymers (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 22, p. 4400, 2023; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1522440010.3390/polym15224400 ↗
23. [23] V. Balaouras, P.-P. Filippatos, A. Chroneos, Mod. Phys. Lett. B, vol. 38, no. 12, p. 2450084, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1142/S021798492450084210.1142/S0217984924500842 ↗
24. [24] I. Syngelakis et al., The European Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, 2023, p. cm_p_12; https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEO/Europe-EQEC57999.2023.10231418 78010.1109/CLEO/Europe-EQEC57999.2023.10231418 ↗
25. [25] J. Shi, J. Zhang, L. Yang, M. Qu, D. Qi, K. H. L. Zhang, Adv. Mater., vol. 33, no. 50, p. 2006230, 2021; https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200623010.1002/adma.202006230 ↗
26. [26] A. A. Manda et al., Arab. J. Chem., vol. 15, no. 8, p. 104004, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.10400410.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104004 ↗
27. [27] W. J. Aziz, G. Zuher, R. S. Sabry, Evaluation the effect of the difference of plant extract (oats) from animal extract (chitosan) on the properties of chromium oxide NPs.
28. [28] L. K. Tinoco Navarro, J. Cihlar, J. Michalicka, J. Kastyl, K. Castkova, Catal. Letters, vol. 154, no. 5, pp. 2422-2442, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-023-04489-710.1007/s10562-023-04489-7 ↗
29. [29] A. Sanchez-Martinez et al., Mater. Res. Express, vol. 6, no. 8, p. 85085, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab21e810.1088/2053-1591/ab21e8 ↗
30. [30] S. Ahmad, M. Faizan, S. Ahmad, M. Ikram, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2018, vol. 1942, no. 1; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.502864410.1063/1.5028644 ↗
31. [31] S. Kumar et al., J. Mol. Struct., vol. 1302, p. 137463, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.13746310.1016/j.molstruc.2023.137463 ↗
32. [32] D. Jacoba, P. Ranaa, A. Ashoka, P. Lasyaa, S. Yadava, SSRN 5078969, 2024; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.507896910.2139/ssrn.5078969 ↗
33. [33] J. Park, A. B. Tesler, E. Gongadze, A. Iglič, P. Schmuki, A. Mazare, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 4430-4438, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c1603310.1021/acsami.3c16033 ↗
34. [34] H. C. Vasconcelos, M. Meirelles, R. Özmenteş, A. Korkut, Coatings, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 19, 2024; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1501001910.3390/coatings15010019 ↗
35. [35] A. Zatsepin et al., Nanomaterials, vol. 12, no. 15, p. 2726, 2022; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1215272610.3390/nano12152726 ↗
36. [36] Abad, Wedian K.;• Abd, Ahmed N.;• Habubi, Nadir Fadhil , Synthesis of Ag2O Nanoparticles via Fresh Pomegranate Peel Extract for Bioapplications , Nano Biomedicine and EngineeringOpen AccessVolume 15, Issue 4, Pages 363 - 3682023., https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.26599/NBE.2023.929003210.26599/NBE.2023.9290032 ↗
37. [37] M. A. Al-Azzawi, M. A. Ali, W. K. Abad, J. Opt., pp. 1-10, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-024-01718-z10.1007/s12596-024-01718-z ↗
38. [38] Habubi, Nadir F.,Ismail, Raid A, Abd, Ahmed N. ,Hamoudi, Walid K. Iimproved photoresponse of porous silicon photodetectors by embedding CdSe nanoparticles , Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics 53, Issue 11, (2015) 718 - 724, http://op.niscair.res.in/index.php/IJPAP/article/view/8461
39. [39] S. A. Abdulgafar, M. A. Ibrahem, Y. M. Hassan, Opt. Mater. (Amst)., vol. 147, p. 114601, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2023.11460110.1016/j.optmat.2023.114601 ↗
40. [40] Shaymaa N. Ismail, Ehab.m. Ali, Bahaa Jawad Alwan, Ahmed N. Abd, International Conference on Science and Engineering of Materials - ICSEM 2021 Part I .February (2022) 2100312; https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.20210031210.1002/masy.202100312 ↗
41. [41] E. Abubakr, A. Abadi, M. Oshita, S. Saito, T. Kan, Opt. Mater. (Amst)., vol. 150, p. 115175, 2024; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2024.11517510.1016/j.optmat.2024.115175 ↗
42. [42] H. Jia et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 105, no. 8, pp. 5252-5261, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.1850110.1111/jace.18501 ↗
43. [43] Obaid, Maithm A., Hellal Harbi, Khalid , Abd, Ahmed N. Study the effect of antibacterial on the chemically prepared copper oxide , Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, (2021) 6006 - 6010https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214785321034799, ,10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.554 ↗