DataVXDigest Journal of Nanomaterials and BiostructuresPaper
journal article·2022-11-01Open access

Photocatalytical degradation of methyl orange (MO) using ZnO nanoparticles from alkaline wasted batteries. The effect of the MO, catalyst, and organic loads

Institute of Technology and Engineering, Autonomous University of Juarez City, 450 Del Charro Av.32310, Juárez City, Chihuahua, México, G. Arroyo-Ortega, J. F. Hernández Paz, Institute of Technology and Engineering, Autonomous University of Juarez City, 450 Del Charro Av.32310, Juárez City, Chihuahua, México, I. Olivas Armendariz, Institute of Technology and Engineering, Autonomous University of Juarez City, 450 Del Charro Av.32310, Juárez City, Chihuahua, México, H. Camacho-Montes, Institute of Technology and Engineering, Autonomous University of Juarez City, 450 Del Charro Av.32310, Juárez City, Chihuahua, México, C. López-Díaz-De León, Institute of Technology and Engineering, Autonomous University of Juarez City, 450 Del Charro Av.32310, Juárez City, Chihuahua, México, H. Reyes-Blas, Institute of Technology and Engineering, Autonomous University of Juarez City, 450 Del Charro Av.32310, Juárez City, Chihuahua, México, C. A. Rodríguez-González, Institute of Technology and Engineering, Autonomous University of Juarez City, 450 Del Charro Av.32310, Juárez City, Chihuahua, México

Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures· Volume 17· Issue 4
Publisher pageOpen full text
Source abstract

Abstract

The photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange (MO) using ZnO nanoparticles is reported. NPs in the range of 40-60 nm were obtained from wasted alkaline batteries anodes. The effect of the MO concentration and the catalyst load were analyzed finding that NPs exhibited similar photocatalytic activities than those reported for ZnO-NPs obtained from pure sources when similar conditions are used. The effect of the organic loads (COD from 60 to 900 ppm) in the catalyst efficiency was studied detecting that COD:60 ppm does not affect the ZnO photocatalytical properties. However, high COD loads (600-900 ppm) make the degradation efficiency almost null.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

Energy storageNanomaterialsCatalysis & surfaces

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. [1] V. Belenguer, F. Martinez-Capel, A. Masiá, Y. Picó, J. Hazard. Mater. 265, 271 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.11.01610.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.11.016 ↗
2. [2] M. Fujita, Y. Ide, D. Sato, P.S. Kench, Y. Kuwahara, H. Yokoki, H. Kayanne, Chemosphere 95, 628, (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.02310.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.023 ↗
3. [3] Estadisticas del Agua en México, edición 2018, Comisión Nacional del Agua. www.gob.mx/conagua. D. R. © Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos (2018).
4. [4]. J. Kaur, S. Bansal, S. Singhal, Physica B: Condensed Matter, 416, 33, (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2013.02.00510.1016/j.physb.2013.02.005 ↗
5. [5]. S. Bhattacharya, P. Rohilla, S. Sharma, "The Future of Effluent Treatment Plants Biological Treatment Systems, 1st Edition" Editors: Maulin Shah, Susana Rodriguez-Couto, Kavit Mehta, Paperback ISBN: 9780128229569, eBook ISBN: 9780128231043, 551, (2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822956-9.00028-310.1016/B978-0-12-822956-9.00028-3 ↗
6. [6] L. F. Garcés Giraldo, G. Peñuela Mesa, Rev. Lasallista Investig., 4(1), 18, (2005).
7. [7] S.M. Rodriguez, M.I.M. Rubio, J.B. Galvez, "Descontaminación de aguas de lavado de envases de plaguicidas mediante Fotocatálisis solar" Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, 189, (2001).
8. [8] R. Javaid, U.Y. Qazi, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (11), 2066, (2019); https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1611206610.3390/ijerph16112066 ↗
9. [9] J.S. Carvajal Muñoz, Producción+ Limpia, 6 (2), 92, (2012).
10. [10]. K.M. Lee, C. W. Lai, K.S. Ngai, J.C. Juan, Water research, 88, 428, (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.04510.1016/j.watres.2015.09.045 ↗
11. [11] M. Abbasa, M. Trarib, Mohamed, Desalination and water treatment, 413, (2021).
12. [12] A. Bhattacharya, A. Selvaraj, J. Indian Chem. Soc, 97 (12), 2730, (2020).
13. [13] P. Peerakiatkhajohn, T. Butburee, H.J. Sul, S. Thaweesak, J.H. Yun, J. H. Nanomaterials, 11(4), 1059, (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1104105910.3390/nano11041059 ↗
14. [14] S.V. Prabhakar Vattikuti, C. Byon, C. V. REDDY, Electronic Materials Letters, 12(6), 812, (2016); https://doi.org/10.1007/s13391-016-6267-y10.1007/s13391-016-6267-y ↗
15. [15] A. Janotti, C.G. Van de Walle, Rep Prog Phy, 72(12), 126501 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/72/12/12650110.1088/0034-4885/72/12/126501 ↗
16. [16] S. Ledakowicz, K. Paździor, Molecules, 26 (4), 870, (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2604087010.3390/molecules26040870 ↗
17. [17] J.O. Tijani, O. Fatoba, G. Madzivire, L.F. Petrik, Air, & Soil Pollution, 225(9), 1, (2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2102-y10.1007/s11270-014-2102-y ↗
18. [18] Z. Hu, D. Grasso, "WATER ANALYSIS | Chemical Oxygen Demand" Editor(s): Paul Worsfold, Alan Townshend, Colin Poole, Encyclopedia of Analytical Science (Second Edition),Elsevier, (2005).
19. [19] C.L. Díaz de León, I. Olivas-Armendariz, J.F. Hernández-Paz, C.D. Gómez-Esparza, H. Reyes-Blas, M. Hernandez Gonzalez, C.A. Rodríguez-González. Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures, 12(2), 371, (2017).
20. [20] R. Bonhomme, P. Gaper, J. Hines Economic feasibility of a novel alkaline battery recycling process." Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2013).
21. [21] S. Sakthivel, B. Neppolion, M.V.Shankar, B. Arabindoo, M. Palanichamy, V. Murugesan, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 77(1), 65, (2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(02)00255-610.1016/S0927-0248(02)00255-6 ↗
22. [22] R. Kumar, G. Kumar, A. Umar, Mater. Lett. 97, 100 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2013.01.04410.1016/j.matlet.2013.01.044 ↗
23. [23] C. Chen, J. Liu, P. Liu, B. Yu, Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci. 14, 1 (2011).
24. [24] R. Y. Hong, J. H. Li, L. L. Chen, D. Q. Liu, H. Z. Li, Y. Zheng, and J. Ding, Powder Technol. 189, 426 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2008.07.00410.1016/j.powtec.2008.07.004 ↗
25. [25] E.D.M. Isa, K. Shameli, N.W.C. Jusoh, R. Hazan, J Nanostruct Chem 11, 187-202 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-020-00358-610.1007/s40097-020-00358-6 ↗
26. [26] Y. Wang, C. Yang, Y. Liu, Y. Fan, F. Dang, Y. Qiu, H. Zhou, W. Wang, Y. Liu Water, 13(22), 3224, (2021); https://doi.org/10.3390/w1322322410.3390/w13223224 ↗
27. [27] S.M. Lam, J.C. Sin, A.Z. Abdullah, A.R. Mohamed, Desalin Water Treat 41, 131 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.66469810.1080/19443994.2012.664698 ↗
28. [28] N. Rana K.S. Ghosh, S. Chand, A.K. Gathania, Indian J Pure Appl Phys, 56,19,(2018)
29. [29] D. Kanakaraju, M.S. Yahya, S.P. Wong, SN Appl. Sci. 1, 738 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0782-z10.1007/s42452-019-0782-z ↗