journal article·2025-04-14Open access

Enhanced heat transfer in copper heat pipes using hybrid nanofluids: experimental and RSM analysis

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India, R. Dhairiyasamy, M. Venkatasudhahar, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600062, Tamilnadu, India, S. Mahendren, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Kongunadu College of Engineering and Technology,Trichy, B. Saleh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia, D. Varshney, Division of Research & innovation, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India, S. Singh, Division of research and development, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India

Abstract

Hybrid nanofluids have emerged as promising candidates for improving thermal performance in heat transfer systems. This study investigates the effects of heat input, inclination angle, and filling ratio on the Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient (OHTC) and Thermal resistance (TR) using mono and hybrid nanofluids, emphasizing particle size and composition. A Response Surface Methodology (RSM) approach was employed to model interactions and optimize operating conditions. Four nanofluids—SiC-L, SiC-S, Al₂O₃/SiCL, and Al₂O₃/SiC-S—were tested in a copper heat pipe with heat inputs ranging from 40– 70 W, inclination angles of 0°–90°, and filling ratios of 60%–90%. The results demonstrate that Al₂O₃/SiC-S achieved the highest U (540 W/m²K) and the lowest R (0.30 K/W) at optimal conditions (70 W heat input, 60° inclination, and 80% filling ratio). Smaller nanoparticles (SiC-S and Al₂O₃/SiC-S) consistently outperformed larger ones due to enhanced surface area and Brownian motion, improving Thermal Conductivity (TC) by up to 48%. These findings highlight the potential of hybrid nanofluids for advanced cooling technologies and suggest future research into long-term stability and cost-effective synthesis for industrial applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer · Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies · Heat Transfer and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. [1] Y. Gao, B. Chen, D. Wu, Z. Dai, C. Wang, X. Zhang, Appl Energy 327 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.12005210.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120052 ↗
2. [2] R. Venkatasamy, J.A. Dhanraj, N. Vinayagam, C. Sirisamphanwong, K. Velmurugan, R. Ngoenmeesri, C. Sirisamphanwong, Electrocatalytic Materials for Renewable Energy 49-69 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119901310.ch310.1002/9781119901310.ch3 ↗
3. [3] K.M. Kim, Y.S. Jeong, I.G. Kim, I.C. Bang, Int J Heat Mass Transf 88 862-871 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.04.10810.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.04.108 ↗
4. [4] J.P. Vallejo, U. Calviño, I. Freire, J. Fernández-Seara, L. Lugo, J Mol Liq 301 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.11237010.1016/j.molliq.2019.112370 ↗
5. [5] J. Burggraf, P. Farber, K.R. Karpaiya, P. Ueberholz, Heat Transfer Engineering 0 1-13 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1080/01457632.2020.181837910.1080/01457632.2020.1818379 ↗
6. [6] P.R. Mashaei, M. Shahryari, S. Madani, Aerosp Sci Technol 59 112-121 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.10.01810.1016/j.ast.2016.10.018 ↗
7. [7] W.M. El-Maghlany, M.M. Abo Elazm, A.I. Shehata, M.A. Teamah, J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 68 338-350 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.09.02410.1016/j.jtice.2016.09.024 ↗
8. [8] O.A. Alawi, N.A.C. Sidik, H.A. Mohammed, S. Syahrullail, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 56 50-62 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.04.01410.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.04.014 ↗
9. [9] N.K. Gupta, A.K. Tiwari, S.K. Verma, P.K.S. Rathore, S.K. Ghosh, Heat Transf Res 50 1767-1779 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1615/HeatTransRes.201903077410.1615/HeatTransRes.2019030774 ↗
10. [10] N. Azimy, M.R. Saffarian, A. Noghrehabadi, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 31 18100-18118 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24640-y10.1007/s11356-022-24640-y ↗
11. [11] S. Elumalai, M. Kadamban, Engineering Research Express 7 015515 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ada5ad10.1088/2631-8695/ada5ad ↗
12. [12] M. Shafahi, V. Bianco, K. Vafai, O. Manca, Int J Heat Mass Transf 53 1438-1445 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.12.00710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.12.007 ↗
13. [13] P. Alphonse, K. Muthukumarasamy, J Therm Anal Calorim 149 2365-2383 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12805-x10.1007/s10973-023-12805-x ↗
14. [14] L.M. Poplaski, S.P. Benn, A. Faghri, Int J Heat Mass Transf 107 358-371 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.10.11110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.10.111 ↗
15. [15] R.R. Riehl, J.E.S. Martin, J. Estella, Advances in Nanofluid Heat Transfer 403-446 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88656-7.00001-510.1016/B978-0-323-88656-7.00001-5 ↗
16. [16] K. Cacua, R. Buitrago-Sierra, B. Herrera, E. Pabón, S.M.S. Murshed, J Therm Anal Calorim 136 1597-1614 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7787-510.1007/s10973-018-7787-5 ↗
17. [17] K. Afsari, M.R. Sarmasti Emami, S. Zahmatkesh, J. Jaromír Klemeš, A. Bokhari, Energy 274 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.12742210.1016/j.energy.2023.127422 ↗
18. [18] P. V. Chilbule, L.P. Dhole, G.R. Chavhan, Mater Today Proc (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.343[19] A.I. Khdair, Eng Anal Bound Elem 155 803-813 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.07.00410.1016/j.enganabound.2023.07.004 ↗