Influences of crystallization time and molar composition of hydrogel on the preparation of sodalite, cancrinite and analcime
Source abstract
Abstract
Sodalite, cancrinite and analcime were synthesized via hydrothermal processes, the influences of crystallization time and molar composition of hydrogel on the crystalline end products were investigated. The results revealed that with the prolongation of crystallization time from 3 min to 80 min, the crystallization followed a sequence of phase transformations from amorphous to zeolite NaA, sodalite and cancrinite. Well-crystallized cancrinite crystals were achieved at Al2O3/SiO2 molar ratios of 0.12, 0.34 and 0.76. However, with the Al2O3/SiO2 molar ratio was increased to 0.95, pure-form sodalite was formed. A gradual increase in the crystallinity of cancrinite was observed with increasing H2O/SiO2 molar ratio, while too high H2O/SiO2 resulted in analcime generated. Also, when the Na2O/SiO2 molar ratios of the hydrogel were 0.70, 1.22 and 4.75, the corresponding products obtained were pure phases of analcime, cancrinite and sodalite, respectively
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis · Clay minerals and soil interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. [1] R. M. Barrer, Zeolites and Clay Minerals as Sorbents and Molecular Sieves, Academic Press, London, 1978.
2. [2] A. Dyer, An Introduction to Zeolite Molecular Sieve, John Wiley, London, 1988.
3. [3] A. M. Manta, D. L. Cursaru, S. Mihai, Dig. J. Nanomater. Bios. 14, 509 (2019).
4. [4] J. Wen, H. Dong, G. Zeng, J. Clean. Prod. 197, 1435 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.27010.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.270 ↗
5. [5] J. Zhao, L. Q. Yang, L. Yu, X. M. Zhao, Y. C. Hao, Z. J. Zhao, Dig. J. Nanomater. Bios. 16, 527 (2021).
6. [6] P. Brea, J. A. Delgado, V. I. Águeda, P. Gutiérrez, M. A. Uguina, Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 286, 187 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.05.02110.1016/j.micromeso.2019.05.021 ↗
7. [7] M. Saifuddin, J. Bae, K. S. Kim, Water Res. 158, 246 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.04510.1016/j.watres.2019.03.045 ↗
8. [8] X. Zhang, Q. Liu, S. Yang, Dig. J. Nanomater. Bios. 15, 769 (2020).
9. [9] J. Zhu, Z. Liu, S. Sukenaga, M. Ando, H. Shibata, T. Okubo, T. Wakihara, Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 268, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-1811(01)00279-710.1016/S1387-1811(01)00279-7 ↗
10. [10] L. B. Bortolatto, R. A. A. Boca Santa, J. C. Moreira, D. B. Machado, M. A. P. M. Martins, M. A. Fiori, N. C. Kuhnen, H. G. Riella, Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 248, 214 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.04.03010.1016/j.micromeso.2017.04.030 ↗
11. [11] X. Xu, Y. Bao, C. Song, W. Yang, J. Liu, L. Lin, Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 75, 173 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.07.01910.1016/j.micromeso.2004.07.019 ↗
12. [12] H. Peng, D. Seneviratne, J. Vaughan, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 1408 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0453810.1021/acs.iecr.7b04538 ↗
13. [13] X, Zhang, D. Tong, W. Jia, D. Tang, X. Li, R. Yang, Mater. Res. Bull. 52, 96 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.01.00810.1016/j.materresbull.2014.01.008 ↗
14. [14] S. Kulprathipanja, Zeolites in industrial separation and catalysis, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/978352762956510.1002/9783527629565 ↗
15. [15] C. A. R. Reyes, C. D. Williams, O. M. C. Alarcon, Rev. Fac. Ing. Univ. Antiquia N. 53, 30 (2010).
16. [16] V. P. Valtchev, K. N. Bozhilov, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 15587 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp048341c10.1021/jp048341c ↗
17. [17] M. C. Barnes, J. Addai-Mensah, A. R. Gerson, Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 31, 287 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-1811(99)00079-710.1016/S1387-1811(99)00079-7 ↗
18. [18] S. Alfaro, C. Rodríguez, M. A. Valenzuela, P. Bosch, Mater. Lett. 61, 4655 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2007.03.00910.1016/j.matlet.2007.03.009 ↗
19. [19] P. Zhang, S. Li, C. Zhang, Biomass Convers. Bior. 9, 641 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00375-810.1007/s13399-019-00375-8 ↗
20. [20] F. Ocanto, R. Alvarez, B. Moy, M. Brikgi, C. U. Navarro, C. F. Linares, J. Mater. Sci. 43, 190 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2083-y10.1007/s10853-007-2083-y ↗
21. [21] A. V. Borhade, T. A. Kshirsagar, A. G. Dholi, J. A. Agashe, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 60, 586 (2015).10.1021/je500698x ↗
22. [22] L. M. Ren, Q. M. Wu, C. G. Yang, L. F. Zhu, C. J. Li, P. L. Zhang, H. Y. Zhang, X. J. Meng, F. S. Xiao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15173 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja304495410.1021/ja3044954 ↗
23. [23] E. Ofer-Rozovsky, M. Arbel Haddad, G. Bar Nes, A. Katz, J. Mater. Sci. 51, 4795 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9767-010.1007/s10853-016-9767-0 ↗
24. [24] M. Fechtelkord, B. Posnatzki, J. C. Buhl, Chem. Mater. 13, 1967 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1021/cm001136z10.1021/cm001136z ↗
25. [25] R. Bian, J. Zhu, Y. Chen, Y. Yu, S. Zhu, L. Zhang, M. Huo, RSC Adv. 9, 36248 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA06940B10.1039/C9RA06940B ↗