Optimizing Hydroxyapatite Loading in Electrospinning Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone Fibers Toward Biocompatible Scaffolds for Critical-Sized Bone Defects
Source abstract
Abstract
Critical-sized bone defects exceed the body's natural healing capacity and often require scaffold materials to support bone regeneration. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is widely used in biomedical applications due to its biocompatibility; however, its osteoconductive performance and mechanical robustness are limited when used alone. To address these limitations, hydroxyapatite (HA) was incorporated into PVP fibers and fabricated into electrospinning scaffolds. PVP/HA composites were prepared at PVP:HA weight ratios of 100:0 (A), 80:20 (B), 60:40 (C), and 40:60 (D), and characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), porosity testing, and in vitro degradation in simulated body fluid (SBF) over 21 days. Among all compositions, the 40:60 scaffold (Sample D) showed the most favorable structural features, exhibiting the smallest average fiber diameter (326 ± 95 nm), the highest porosity (86.03%), and an increased crystallinity. In SBF, Sample D displayed controlled degradation, with weight loss increasing from 20.55% (day 7) to 61.06% (day 21). Overall, increasing HA loading improved scaffold microstructure and degradation behavior, suggesting that the 40:60 PVP/HA composition offers an optimal balance for electrospinning scaffold design toward bone tissue engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 60231 Surabaya, Indonesia
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Airlangga University, 60115 Surabaya, Indonesia
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, 63471 Ponorogo, Indonesia
Funding
Penelitian dasar Kolaborasi (LPPM) Universitas Negeri Surabaya
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Xia Q, Zhou S, Zhou J, Zhao X, Saif MS, Wang J, et al. Recent Advances and Challenges for Biological Materials in Micro/Nanocarrier Synthesis for Bone Infection and Tissue Engineering. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2025; 11: 1945–1969.10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c02118 ↗
2. Nauth A, Schemitsch E, Norris B, Nollin Z, Watson JT. Critical-Size Bone Defects: Is There a Consensus for Diagnosis and Treatment? Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2018; 32: S7–S11.10.1097/bot.0000000000001115 ↗
3. Quek J, Vizetto-Duarte C, Teoh SH, Choo Y. Towards Stem Cell Therapy for Critical-Sized Segmental Bone Defects: Current Trends and Challenges on the Path to Clinical Translation. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2024; 15: 145.10.3390/jfb15060145 ↗
4. Zhou J, Akrami N, Wang H, Fang L, Shen J, Yu C, et al. Enhanced healing of critical-sized bone defects using degradable scaffolds with tailored composition through immunomodulation and angiogenesis. Bioactive Materials. 2024; 44: 371–388.10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.10.018 ↗
5. Lim DJ. Bone Mineralization in Electrospun-Based Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers. 2022; 14: 2123.10.3390/polym14102123 ↗
6. Anjum S, Arya DK, Saeed M, Ali D, Athar MS, Yulin W, et al. Multifunctional electrospun nanofibrous scaffold enriched with alendronate and hydroxyapatite for balancing osteogenic and osteoclast activity to promote bone regeneration. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2023; 11: 1302594.10.3389/fbioe.2023.1302594 ↗
7. Stella SMM, Rama M, Sridhar TM, Vijayalakshmi U. Optimization of Biologically Inspired Electrospun Scaffold for Effective Use in Bone Regenerative Applications. Polymers. 2024; 16: 2023.10.3390/polym16142023 ↗
8. Wei J, Chen X, Xu Y, Shi L, Zhang M, Nie M, et al. Significance and considerations of establishing standardized critical values for critical size defects in animal models of bone tissue regeneration. Heliyon. 2024; 10: e33768.10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33768 ↗
9. Farjaminejad S, Farjaminejad R, Hasani M, Garcia-Godoy F, Abdouss M, Marya A, et al. Advances and Challenges in Polymer-Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Path Towards Personalized Regenerative Medicine. Polymers. 2024; 16: 3303.10.3390/polym16233303 ↗
10. Wu V, Helder MN, Bravenboer N, Ten Bruggenkate CM, Jin J, Klein-Nulend J, et al. Bone Tissue Regeneration in the Oral and Maxillofacial Region: A Review on the Application of Stem Cells and New Strategies to Improve Vascularization. Stem Cells International. 2019; 2019: 6279721.10.1155/2019/6279721 ↗
11. Arif ZU. The role of polysaccharide-based biodegradable soft polymers in the healthcare sector. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research. 2025; 8: 132–156.10.1016/j.aiepr.2024.05.001 ↗
12. Rethinam S. Enhanced bone orthopedic dental implants: Integrating reduced graphene oxide with chitosan and hydroxyapatite. Nano LIFE. 2026; 16: 2550001.10.1142/S1793984425500011 ↗
13. Kengelbach-Weigand A, Thielen C, Bäuerle T, Götzl R, Gerber T, Körner C, et al. Personalized medicine for reconstruction of critical-size bone defects - a translational approach with customizable vascularized bone tissue. NPJ Regenerative Medicine. 2021; 6: 49.10.1038/s41536-021-00158-8 ↗
14. Dinatha IKH, Diputra AH, Wihadmadyatami H, Partini J, Yusuf Y. Nanofibrous electrospun scaffold doped with hydroxyapatite derived from sand lobster shell (Panulirus homarus) for bone tissue engineering. RSC Advances. 2024; 14: 8222–8239.10.1039/d4ra00619d ↗
15. Sadek AA, Abd-Elkareem M, Abdelhamid HN, Moustafa S, Hussein K. Enhancement of critical-sized bone defect regeneration using UiO-66 nanomaterial in rabbit femurs. BMC Veterinary Research. 2022; 18: 260.10.1186/s12917-022-03347-9 ↗
16. Polo-Corrales L, Latorre-Esteves M, Ramirez-Vick JE. Scaffold design for bone regeneration. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2014; 14: 15–56.10.1166/jnn.2014.9127 ↗
17. Abrishami M, Jafari M, Dalvandi B, Dalvandi R, Sarrafan N, Pourjebreil M, et al. Biological and Synthetic Materials in Mandibular Reconstruction. Galen Medical Journal. 2024; 13; e3533.10.31661/gmj.v13iSP1.3533 ↗
18. Kareem MM, Tanner KE. Optimising micro-hydroxyapatite reinforced poly(lactide acid) electrospun scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine. 2020; 31: 38.10.1007/s10856-020-06376-8 ↗
19. van Manen EHC, Zhang W, Walboomers XF, Vazquez B, Yang F, Ji W, et al. The influence of electrospun fibre scaffold orientation and nano-hydroxyapatite content on the development of tooth bud stem cells in vitro. Odontology. 2014; 102: 14–21.10.1007/s10266-012-0087-9 ↗
20. Shakya AK, Kandalam U. Three-dimensional macroporous materials for tissue engineering of craniofacial bone. The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017; 55: 875–891.10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.09.007 ↗
21. Brunello G, Panda S, Schiavon L, Sivolella S, Biasetto L, Del Fabbro M. The Impact of Bioceramic Scaffolds on Bone Regeneration in Preclinical In Vivo Studies: A Systematic Review. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2020; 13: 1500.10.3390/ma13071500 ↗
22. Crowley C, Wong JML, Fisher DM, Khan WS. A systematic review on preclinical and clinical studies on the use of scaffolds for bone repair in skeletal defects. Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2013; 8: 243–252.10.2174/1574888x11308030009 ↗
23. Rossi N, Hadad H, Bejar-Chapa M, Peretti GM, Randolph MA, Redmond RW, et al. Bone Marrow Stem Cells with Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Large Bone Segmental Defects: A Systematic Review. Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews. 2023; 29: 457–472.10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0213 ↗
24. Maheshwari V, Dhingra M, Sharma D, Gowda AKS, Kurmi A, Das S. Retrospective Outcome Analysis of Allogenic Bone Graft. South Asian Journal of Cancer. 2023; 14: 711–715.10.1055/s-0043-1772775 ↗
25. Wong SK, Yee MMF, Chin KY, Ima-Nirwana S. A Review of the Application of Natural and Synthetic Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2023; 14: 286.10.3390/jfb14050286 ↗
26. Zhong L, Qu Y, Shi K, Chu B, Lei M, Huang K, et al. Biomineralized polymer matrix composites for bone tissue repair: a review. Science China Chemistry. 2018; 61: 1553–1567.10.1007/s11426-018-9324-0 ↗
27. El Hotaby W, Bakr AM, Sherif HH, Soliman AA, Hemdan B. Exploring the antimicrobial and anticancer activities of zinc doped nanohydroxyapatite prepared via ultrasonic-assisted method for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Research. 2024; 39: 1911–1925.10.1557/s43578-024-01350-4 ↗
28. Zhou B, Jiang X, Zhou X, Tan W, Luo H, Lei S, et al. GelMA-based bioactive hydrogel scaffolds with multiple bone defect repair functions: therapeutic strategies and recent advances. Biomaterials Research. 2023; 27: 86.10.1186/s40824-023-00422-6 ↗
29. Fu S, Wang X, Guo G, Shi S, Liang H, Luo F, et al. Preparation and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite/poly (ε-caprolactone)− poly (ethylene glycol)− poly (ε-caprolactone) composite fibers for tissue engineering. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2010; 114: 18372–18378.10.1021/jp106488t ↗
30. Guarino V, Taddei P, Di Foggia M, Fagnano C, Ciapetti G, Ambrosio L. The influence of hydroxyapatite particles on in vitro degradation behavior of poly epsilon-caprolactone-based composite scaffolds. Tissue Engineering. Part a. 2009; 15: 3655–3668.10.1089/ten.TEA.2008.0543 ↗
31. Korbut A. High-filler content electrospun fibers from biodegradable polymers and hydroxyapatite: Toward improved scaffolds for tissue engineering. Polimery W Medycynie. 2024; 54: 161–166.10.17219/pim/196351 ↗
32. Kumar A, Negi YS, Choudhary V, Bhardwaj NK. Microstructural and mechanical properties of porous biocomposite scaffolds based on polyvinyl alcohol, nano-hydroxyapatite and cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose. 2014; 21: 3409–3426.10.1007/s10570-014-0339-7 ↗
33. Nahavandizadeh N, Rezaei M. Preparation of shape memory polyurethane/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffolds by electrospinning method and investigation of their microstructure and physical-mechanical properties. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials. 2020; 59: 1562–1573.10.1080/25740881.2020.1757105 ↗