Highly Efficient Plasmonic Membrane Flow Reactor
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A plasmonic flow reactor, consisting of thin Au film at exits of monolithic anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) membranes under LED illumination is demonstrated. The system shows over 200% quantum efficiency (QE) for peroxide activation and the ability to limit to single oxidation reaction by controlling residence time with flow rate and pore geometry. Periodic pore arrays (20–200 nm diameter) with 25 nm thick Au on AAO are modeled by finite‐difference time‐domain (FDTD) simulations and predicted largest E‐field enhancements for the larger 200 nm pore diameters. Peroxide activation, as measured by O2 generation is most efficient with a 200 nm pore diameter system under 523 nm LED illumination. The optimal wavelength falls near the absorption peak of Au@AAO with 200 nm pore diameter suggesting that hot electron generated from gold plasmonic response is the primary mechanism for activation of H2O2. QE for gold plasmonic flow system calculated from O2 generation experiments is as high as 250%, which indicates a mechanism of hot‐electron activation of peroxide that leaves a still energetic hot‐electron to catalytically activate multiple reactions. The formation of Au surface oxides that are catalytically active in dark is also observed and must be accounted for in Au plasmonic photochemical studies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Molecular Engineering and Sciences Institute Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Washington 616 NE Northlake PL, Room 675B Seattle WA 98105 USA
Funding
Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0088110.1021/acsphotonics.7b00881 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.aat696710.1126/science.aat6967 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41598-018-28909-610.1038/s41598-018-28909-6 ↗
4. 10.1038/ncomms879710.1038/ncomms8797 ↗
5. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-052516-04494810.1146/annurev-physchem-052516-044948 ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat428110.1038/nmat4281 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat315110.1038/nmat3151 ↗
8. 10.1038/nnano.2013.1810.1038/nnano.2013.18 ↗
9. 10.1039/C7CS00238F10.1039/C7CS00238F ↗
10. 10.1021/jp025744910.1021/jp0257449 ↗
11. 10.1021/nl072237010.1021/nl0722370 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41929-018-0138-x10.1038/s41929-018-0138-x ↗
13. 10.1038/s41570-018-0031-910.1038/s41570-018-0031-9 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0046110.1021/acsenergylett.8b00461 ↗
15. 10.1039/c3cs60364d10.1039/c3cs60364d ↗
16. 10.1038/nnano.2017.13110.1038/nnano.2017.131 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-017-00055-z10.1038/s41467-017-00055-z ↗
18. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0099010.1021/acsenergylett.9b00990 ↗
19. 10.1038/nmat345410.1038/nmat3454 ↗
20. 10.1021/nl303940z10.1021/nl303940z ↗
21. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0292410.1021/acsnano.9b02924 ↗
22. 10.1021/jp202769a10.1021/jp202769a ↗
23. 10.1021/nl503131s10.1021/nl503131s ↗
24. 10.1016/S1002-0721(08)60270-710.1016/S1002-0721(08)60270-7 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.03.02310.1016/j.apcata.2015.03.023 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0488710.1021/acsnano.7b04887 ↗
27. 10.1021/nl400328x10.1021/nl400328x ↗
28. Ghosh‐Mazumdar A. S. · 1968 · 193
29. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.01010.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.010 ↗
30. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0013310.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00133 ↗