journal article·2025-09-12

Reactive Suspension Electrolytes for Lithium Metal Batteries

Junyoung Lee, Mun Sek Kim, Yi Cui, Wenbo Zhang, Sanzeeda Baig Shuchi, Sarah E. Holmes, Jun Ho Lee, Chad Serrao, Sang Cheol Kim, John Holoubek, Philaphon Sayavong, Angela Cai, Il Rok Choi, Yi Cui

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 10· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) suffer from dendrite growth and capacity loss, which compromise safety and cycle life. Here, we present a simple reactive suspension electrolyte (RSE) strategy. When metal oxide (MO x ) nanoparticles are dispersed in the liquid electrolyte, in situ formation of Li 2 O and Li–M phases occurs at the lithium metal anode. By studying two different types of RSEs, Type 1 RSEs (i.e., CuO RSE) without metal-Li alloying and Type 2 RSEs (i.e., ZnO RSE and In 2 O 3 RSE) with metal-Li alloying capability, we elucidate the roles of each reaction compound. We find that Li 2 O can improve reversibility of Li metal anode by stabilizing the interphase while Li–M alloy phases guide uniform Li metal plating. Compared to the carbonate-type reference electrolyte, RSEs demonstrate reduced nucleation overpotential, lower interfacial impedance, and higher Coulombic efficiency, leading to an extended cycle life in Li|Li 1 Ni 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 full cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Stanford University

Department of Chemical Engineering

Department of Chemistry

Department of Physics

Department of Energy Science and Engineering

Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

Funding

Kwanjeong Educational Foundation · Basic Energy Sciences · TomKat Center for Sustainable Energy, Stanford University · Link Foundation Energy Fellowships · Vehicle Technologies Office

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C3EE40795K10.1039/C3EE40795K ↗
2. 10.1038/nnano.2017.1610.1038/nnano.2017.16 ↗
3. 10.1149/1.212885910.1149/1.2128859 ↗
4. 10.1021/cr030203g10.1021/cr030203g ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.08.00710.1016/j.joule.2023.08.007 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467-022-29199-310.1038/s41467-022-29199-3 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41560-025-01716-w10.1038/s41560-025-01716-w ↗
8. 10.1002/aenm.20200144010.1002/aenm.202001440 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41560-019-0428-910.1038/s41560-019-0428-9 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20210162710.1002/anie.202101627 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41560-023-01280-110.1038/s41560-023-01280-1 ↗
12. 10.1038/ncomms736210.1038/ncomms7362 ↗
13. 10.1149/1945-7111/abd60e10.1149/1945-7111/abd60e ↗
14. 10.1038/s41560-019-0336-z10.1038/s41560-019-0336-z ↗
15. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0036510.1021/acsenergylett.1c00365 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.0c2119510.1021/acsami.0c21195 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.01.02810.1016/j.ensm.2021.01.028 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20240744310.1002/adma.202407443 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20170775410.1002/anie.201707754 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.10.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.10.020 ↗
21. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.1010.1038/nenergy.2016.10 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.14362610.1016/j.electacta.2023.143626 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20220971510.1002/adfm.202209715 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41563-021-01172-310.1038/s41563-021-01172-3 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.aam601410.1126/science.aam6014 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0019410.1021/acsenergylett.0c00194 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0155010.1021/acsenergylett.3c01550 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20220358010.1002/adma.202203580 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.01510.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.015 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41560-024-01494-x10.1038/s41560-024-01494-x ↗
31. 10.1021/acsnano.2c1247010.1021/acsnano.2c12470 ↗