journal article·2025-01Open access

Acoustic Fingerprinting and Nanoslip Dynamics of Biofilms

Saikat Jana, Nikhil Bhalla

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 35· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract It is reported that bacteria can generate nanomotion, but understanding the complex dynamics of bacterial colony gliding on solid interfaces has remained unresolved. Here, this work captures the real‐time development and gliding of bacterial biofilms on vibrating solids made of piezoelectric quartz. The gliding, characterized by liquid slips, is measured in form of frequency and dissipation changes of the vibrating solid. These vibrations enable the generation of distinct acoustic fingerprints (sound/ music) of the three phases of biofilm development: viscoelastic strengthening, biofilm growth and biofilm stability. In adition, the effect of extracellular matrix secretion on the rigidity of the film and its nanoslip in each of the distinct biofilm developmental phases is quantified. This work provides a real‐time, label‐free method of quantifying bacteria biofilm dynamics and paves the way for developing libraries of acoustic signatures of bacteria and their metabolic products.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Engineering Ulster University 2‐24 York Street Belfast BT15 1AP UK

Nanotechnology and Integrated Bioengineering Centre (NIBEC), School of Engineering Ulster University 2‐24 York Street Belfast Northern Ireland BT15 1AP UK

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.295.5559.148710.1126/science.295.5559.1487 ↗
2. 10.1038/nrmicro177410.1038/nrmicro1774 ↗
3. 10.1038/nrd100810.1038/nrd1008 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.284.5418.131810.1126/science.284.5418.1318 ↗
5. 10.1073/pnas.101103310810.1073/pnas.1011033108 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0900810.1021/acsnano.2c09008 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.2c1012710.1021/acsnano.2c10127 ↗
8. 10.1002/smll.20220622010.1002/smll.202206220 ↗
9. 10.1021/acssensors.8b0028710.1021/acssensors.8b00287 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.bioflm.2022.10010310.1016/j.bioflm.2022.100103 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)10018-110.1016/S0076-6879(99)10018-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.fm.2020.10359210.1016/j.fm.2020.103592 ↗
13. 10.1021/acssensors.1c0272210.1021/acssensors.1c02722 ↗
14. Saulnier J. · Bioelectrochemistry · 2023
15. 10.1016/j.snr.2021.10004310.1016/j.snr.2021.100043 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.13303410.1016/j.snb.2022.133034 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tcsw.2019.10002410.1016/j.tcsw.2019.100024 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41598-022-22669-010.1038/s41598-022-22669-0 ↗
19. 10.1039/c2sm26025e10.1039/c2sm26025e ↗
20. 10.1002/pssa.20230031010.1002/pssa.202300310 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.03810.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.038 ↗
22. 10.1021/la300333c10.1021/la300333c ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.6b0222710.1021/acsami.6b02227 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.03510.1016/j.jcis.2011.01.035 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41467-022-34319-010.1038/s41467-022-34319-0 ↗
26. 10.1017/jfm.2023.49010.1017/jfm.2023.490 ↗
27. 10.1038/srep0958610.1038/srep09586 ↗
28. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz050410.1126/sciadv.aaz0504 ↗
29. 10.1039/C9SM01839E10.1039/C9SM01839E ↗
30. 10.1038/nnano.2013.12010.1038/nnano.2013.120 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41565-022-01111-610.1038/s41565-022-01111-6 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.14091710.1016/j.electacta.2022.140917 ↗
33. 10.1093/femsre/fuy00110.1093/femsre/fuy001 ↗
34. 10.1080/14787210.2017.126225710.1080/14787210.2017.1262257 ↗
35. Biofilm Standards and Regulations Report2022 https://doi.org/10.5258/biofilms/009.
36. 10.1038/s41579-022-00767-010.1038/s41579-022-00767-0 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41579-022-00791-010.1038/s41579-022-00791-0 ↗
38. 10.20964/2021.12.1510.20964/2021.12.15 ↗
39. A.Fort E.Landi A. L.Grasso M.Mugnaini E.Panzardi V.Vignoli F. F.Mahdizadeh A.Magnani in2022 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)2022 pp.1–6 https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856431.10.1109/MeMeA54994.2022.9856431 ↗
40. 10.1021/la061118h10.1021/la061118h ↗
41. 10.1002/advs.20220737310.1002/advs.202207373 ↗
42. 10.1116/1.133568110.1116/1.1335681 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41467-017-00295-z10.1038/s41467-017-00295-z ↗
44. 10.1007/5346_03110.1007/5346_031 ↗
45. 10.1002/pol.2021032410.1002/pol.20210324 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0060010.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00600 ↗
47. 10.1038/ncpuro123110.1038/ncpuro1231 ↗
48. 10.1038/pj.2015.4310.1038/pj.2015.43 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c0037410.1021/acs.langmuir.4c00374 ↗
50. M.Weigert U.Schmidt R.Haase K.Sugawara G.Myers inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) IEEE Snowmass CO2020.
51. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.0049110.3389/fmicb.2016.00491 ↗