journal article·2015-11

Why Inverted Small Molecule Solar Cells Outperform Their Noninverted Counterparts

Diana Nanova, Michael Scherer, Felix Schell, Johannes Zimmermann, Tobias Glaser, Anne Katrin Kast, Christian Krekeler, Annemarie Pucci, Wolfgang Kowalsky, Rasmus R. Schröder, Robert Lovrinčić

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 25· Issue 41
Publisher page

Abstract

It is shown that the effect of substrate heating on the photo conversion efficiency in vacuum‐deposited small molecule organic solar cells is closely related to the improved free charge generation in ordered C60 regions. The formation of these ordered regions strongly depends on the deposition sequence in the device and differs therefore between inverted and noninverted cells. Substrate‐induced local fullerene ordering is found in small molecule:C60 bulk heterojunctions (BHJs) deposited on pristine C60 at elevated temperatures. This does not occur for BHJs deposited under identical conditions on pristine donor molecule layers, despite similar degrees of phase separation in both cases. These findings point to a hitherto unidentified advantage of inverted over noninverted solar cells that manifests itself in a higher charge separation efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fullerene Chemistry and Applications · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for High‐Frequency Technology TU Braunschweig 38106 Braunschweig Germany

InnovationLab GmbH Speyerer Str. 4 69115 Heidelberg Germany

Kirchhoff Institute for Physics Heidelberg University 69120 Heidelberg Germany

Cryo‐EM, CellNetworks, BioQuant Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg 69120 Heidelberg Germany

Centre for Advanced Materials Heidelberg University 69120 Heidelberg Germany

Funding

German Ministry of Education and Research

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20130462010.1002/adma.201304620 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.9693710.1063/1.96937 ↗
3. 10.1039/c3ee40388b10.1039/c3ee40388b ↗
4. 10.1063/1.489301210.1063/1.4893012 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.10442310.1063/1.104423 ↗
6. 10.1038/nature0194910.1038/nature01949 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20060065810.1002/adma.200600658 ↗
8. 10.1038/nmat416710.1038/nmat4167 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.186345110.1063/1.1863451 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.24531410.1103/PhysRevB.85.245314 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.12.00710.1016/j.orgel.2010.12.007 ↗
12. 10.1002/pssb.20098230910.1002/pssb.200982309 ↗
13. Djobo S. O. · 2011 · 251
14. 10.1002/adfm.20120051210.1002/adfm.201200512 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20110169710.1002/adfm.201101697 ↗
16. 10.1021/nl201078t10.1021/nl201078t ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20130238910.1002/adma.201302389 ↗
18. 10.1038/ncomms424510.1038/ncomms4245 ↗
19. 10.1021/ja411859m10.1021/ja411859m ↗
20. 10.1126/science.124624910.1126/science.1246249 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.364412910.1063/1.3644129 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20110179910.1002/adfm.201101799 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.03.00810.1016/j.orgel.2012.03.008 ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20140034510.1002/adfm.201400345 ↗
25. 10.1109/TSMC.1979.431007610.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.474812310.1063/1.4748123 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00339-003-2494-910.1007/s00339-003-2494-9 ↗
28. 10.1021/jp406737210.1021/jp4067372 ↗
29. 10.1038/ncomms638810.1038/ncomms6388 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.153462110.1063/1.1534621 ↗
31. 10.1021/jz400233910.1021/jz4002339 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.315455410.1063/1.3154554 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.18550610.1103/PhysRevLett.110.185506 ↗
34. 10.1039/c2ee03178g10.1039/c2ee03178g ↗
35. 10.1021/jp960976r10.1021/jp960976r ↗