journal article·2019-07-26Open access

Influence of the number of insertions and removals of telescopic zirconia/alumina crowns on retentive force and settling

Yusuke YOSHIKAWA, Katsunori TORII, Masahiro TANAKA

Dental Materials Journal· Volume 38· Issue 4

Abstract

Telescopic crowns made from zirconia/alumina can be manufactured using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. For their successful clinical use, a suitable retentive force must be maintained over an extended period. However, it is unclear how retentive force and secondary crown settling change after repeated crown insertion and removal. The aim of the present study was to investigate the changes in retentive force and secondary crown settling of telescopic crowns made from zirconia/alumina. Primary crowns with tapers of 2° and 4° were used. Repeated insertion and removal tests were performed for 10,000 cycles at a cyclic load of 50 N. The loads applied when measuring retentive force and settling were 50 and 100 N. The number of insertions and removals had a significant effect on retentive force and settling at both loads (p<0.01). Taper also had a significant effect on retentive force and settling at both loads (p<0.01).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion, Osaka Dental University

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 1) Wöstmann B, Balkenhol M, Weber A, Weber A, Ferger P, Rehmann P. Long-term analysis of telescopic crown retained removable partial dentures: survival and need for maintenance. J Dent 2007; 35: 939-945.10.1016/j.jdent.2007.09.010 ↗
2. 2) Koller B, Att W, Strub JR. Survival rates of teeth, implants, and double crown-retained removable dental prostheses: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24: 109-117.
3. 3) Schwindling FS, Dittmann B, Rammelsberg P. Double-crownretained removable dental prostheses: a retrospective study of survival and complications. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 488-493.10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.017 ↗
4. 4) Gökçen-Röhlig B, Saruhanoglu A, Cifter ED, Evlioglu G. Applicability of zirconia dental prostheses for metal allergy patients. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 562-565.
5. 5) Nakagawa S, Torii K, Tanaka M. Effects of taper and space settings of telescopic Ce-TZP/A crowns on retentive force and settling. Dent Mater J 2017; 36: 230-235.10.4012/dmj.2016-258 ↗
6. 6) Ban S, Sato H, Suehiro Y, Nakanishi H, Nawa M. Biaxial flexure strength and low temperature degradation of Ce-TZP/ Al2O3 nanocomposite and Y-TZP as dental restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 87: 492-498.10.1002/jbm.b.31131 ↗
7. 7) Lughi V, Sergo V. Low temperature degradation -aging- of zirconia: A critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 807-820.10.1016/j.dental.2010.04.006 ↗
8. 8) Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, Ban S, Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res 2013; 57: 236-261.10.1016/j.jpor.2013.09.001 ↗
9. 9) Tanaka S, Takaba M, Ishiura Y, Kamimura E, Baba K. A 3-year follow-up of ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina nanocomposite (Ce-TZP/A) frameworks for xed dental prostheses. J Prosthodont Res 2015; 59: 55-61.10.1016/j.jpor.2014.11.006 ↗
10. 10) Ohkawa S, Okane H, Nagasawa T, Tsuru H. Changes in retention of various telescope crown assemblies over long term use. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 153-158.10.1016/0022-3913(90)90170-H ↗
11. 11) Güngör MA, Artunç C, Sonugelen M. Parameters affecting retentive force of conus crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 271-277.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01036.x ↗
12. 12) Shimakura M, Nagata T, Takeuchi M, Nemoto T. Retentive force of pure titanium konus telescope crowns fabricated using CAD/CAM system. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 211-215.10.4012/dmj.27.211 ↗
13. 13) Brace CL, Nagai M. Japanese tooth size: part and present. Am J Phys Anthropol 1982; 59: 399-411.10.1002/ajpa.1330590410 ↗
14. 14) Sakai Y, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Igarashi Y. Effects of surface roughness and tapered angle of cone crown telescopic system on retentive force. Dent Mater J 2011; 30: 635-641.10.4012/dmj.2011-006 ↗
15. 15) Olejnik S, Algina J. Measures of effect size for comparative studies: applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemp Educ Psychol 2000; 25: 241-286.10.1006/ceps.2000.1040 ↗
16. 16) Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009; 41: 1149-1160.10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 ↗
17. 17) Saiki O, Koizumi H, Nogawa H, Hiraba H, Akazawa N, Matsumura H. Influence of ceramic surface texture on the wear of gold alloy and heat-pressed ceramics. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 865-873.10.4012/dmj.2014-129 ↗
18. 18) Omori S, Komada W, Yoshida K, Miura H. Effect of thickness of zirconia-ceramic crown frameworks on strength and fracture pattern. Dent Mater J 2013; 32: 189-194.10.4012/dmj.2012-255 ↗
19. 19) De Boever JA, McCall WD Jr, Holden S, Ash MM Jr. Functional occlusal forces: an investigation by telemetry. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40: 326-333.10.1016/0022-3913(78)90042-2 ↗
20. 20) Geckili O, Bilhan H, Mumcu E, Dayan C, Yabul A, Tuncer N. Comparison of patient satisfaction, quality of life, and bite force between elderly edentulous patients wearing mandibular two implant-supported overdentures and conventional complete dentures after 4 years. Spec Care Dentist 2012; 32: 136-141.10.1111/j.1754-4505.2012.00258.x ↗
21. 21) Niwatcharoenchaikul W, Tumrasvin W, Arksornnukit M. Effect of complete denture occlusal schemes on masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1337-1342.10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.06.003 ↗
22. 22) Anderson DJ. A method of recording masticatory loads. J Dent Res 1953; 32: 785-789.10.1177/00220345530320060601 ↗
23. 23) Zarb G, Hobkirk J, Eckert S, Jacob R. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients: Complete dentures and implant-supported prostheses. 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co; 2003. p. 417-418.
24. 24) D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, Vadini M, De Angelis F. Wear evaluation of prosthetic materials opposing themselves. Oper Dent 2018; 43: 38-50.10.2341/16-212-L ↗
25. 25) Tanaka K, Tamura J, Kawanabe K, Nawa M, Uchida M, Kokubo T, et al. Phase stability after aging and its influence on pin-on-disk wear properties of Ce-TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite and conventional Y-TZP. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 67: 200-207.10.1002/jbm.a.10006 ↗
26. 26) Körber KH. Konuskronen: Das rationelle teleskopsystem. Einführung in klinik und technik. 5th ed. Heidelberg: Dr. Alfred Hüthig Verlag GmbH; 1988. p. 64-91.