Effects of zinc oxide-eugenol and calcium hydroxide/ iodoform on delaying root resorption in primary molars without successors
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) and calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste (Vitapex), as root canal filling materials in pulpectomy, on delaying the root resorption of primary molars without permanent successors. Animal models without permanent successors were surgically established in beagle dogs. Root resorption was observed via periapical radiographs. The onset of root resorption of primary mandibular molars without successors occurred later (p<0.05) than physiologic resorption. ZOE pulpectomy clearly delayed the root resorption of primary molars without permanent successors (p<0.05), whereas resorption of primary molars with Vitapex pulpectomy started at almost the same time as physiologic resorption. Compared with Vitapex, ZOE was a more effective root canal filling material in delaying the root resorption of primary molars.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · dental development and anomalies · Dental Radiography and Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00158.x10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00158.x ↗
2. 10.1046/j.1365-263X.2003.00436.x10.1046/j.1365-263X.2003.00436.x ↗
3. 10.1038/sj.bdj.480992510.1038/sj.bdj.4809925 ↗
4. 10.1046/j.1365-263X.2001.00257.x10.1046/j.1365-263X.2001.00257.x ↗
5. 5) Kubota K, Golden BE, Penugonda B. Root canal filling materials for primary teeth: a review of the literature. ASDC J Dent Child 1992; 59: 225-227.
6. 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00774.x10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00774.x ↗
7. 7) Marks SC Jr, Cahill DR. Regional control by the dental follicle of alterations in alveolar bone metabolism during tooth eruption. J Oral Pathol 1987; 16: 164-169.10.1111/j.1600-0714.1987.tb02060.x ↗
8. 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90116-310.1016/0003-9969(94)90116-3 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00950.x10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00950.x ↗
10. 10.2334/josnusd.49.110.2334/josnusd.49.1 ↗
11. 11) Fuks AB. Pulp therapy in the primary dentition. In: Pinkham JR, ed. Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy Through Adolescence. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders 1999: 341-355.
12. 12) Rifkin A. A simple, effective, safe technique for the root canal treatment of abscessed primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child 1980; 47: 435-441.
13. 13) Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2004; 14: 417-424.10.1111/j.1365-263X.2004.00544.x ↗
14. 14) Nurko C, Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of a calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste (Vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1999; 23: 289-294.
15. 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00150.x10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00150.x ↗
16. 16) Sweet C. Procedure for treatment of exposed and pulpless deciduous teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1930; 17: 1150-1153.
17. 17) Mass E, Zilberman UL. Endodontic treatment of infected primary teeth, using Maisto’s paste. ASDCJ Dent Child 1989; 56: 117-120.
18. 18) Harini Priya M, Bhat SS, Sundeep Hedge K. Comparative evaluation of bactericidal potential of four root canal filling materials against microflora of infected non-vital primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010; 35: 23-29.10.17796/jcpd.35.1.u57p4500360g2752 ↗
19. 10.1590/S0103-6440200900040000510.1590/S0103-64402009000400005 ↗
20. 20) Fuks AB, Eidelman E. Pulp therapy in the primary dentition. Curr Opin Dent 1991; 1: 556-563.
21. 10.1016/0030-4220(82)90394-210.1016/0030-4220(82)90394-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90369-410.1016/0030-4220(84)90369-4 ↗
23. 23) Coll J, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent 1996; 18: 57-63.