journal article·2016Open access

Efficacy of denture cleaners on the surface roughness and Candida albicans adherence of sealant agent coupled denture base materials

Ayşegül KÖROĞLU, Onur ŞAHİN, Doğu Ömür DEDE, Şule Tuğba DENİZ, Nurdan KARACAN SEVER, Serkan ÖZKAN

Dental Materials Journal· Volume 35· Issue 5

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of denture cleansers on the surface roughness and Candida albicans adherence of surface sealant agent coupled denture base resins. One hundred and twenty specimens were fabricated from 2 polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) (Meliodent; Acron MC) and 1 polyamide (Deflex) denture base materials, coated with a sealant agent (Palaseal) and divided into 4 groups (n=10) according to overnight cleaning procedures: distilled water (control), 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and two different sodium perborate (Corega; Rapident). The surface roughness values were measured with a profilometer before (Ra0) and after 90 days immersion in denture cleaners (Ra1). Specimens were incubated with Candida albicans suspension and Candida colony- forming units (CFU) (Cfu/mm) were counted. Significant differences were found, between the Ra0 and Ra1 values of 5% NaOCl applied Acron MC, Deflex and also Rapident applied Deflex groups (p<0.05). Denture cleaning procedures had no significant effects on the quantitiy of Candida albicans.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Antifungal resistance and susceptibility · Dental Erosion and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bulent Ecevit University

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Biruni University

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,Ankara University

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 1) Berger JC, Driscoll CF, Romberg E, Luo Q, Thompson G.Surface roughness of denture base acrylic resins after processing and after polishing. J Prosthodont 2006; 15: 180-186.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00098.x ↗
2. 2) Singh S, Palaskar JN, Mittal S. Comparative evaluation of surface porosities in conventional heat polymerized acrylic resin cured by water bath and microwave energy with microwavable acrylic resin cured by microwave energy. Contemp Clin Dent 2013; 4: 147-151.10.4103/0976-237X.114844 ↗
3. 3) Gungor H, Gundogdu M, Duymus ZY. Investigation of the effect of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of denture base and repair materials. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1271-1277.10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.023 ↗
4. 4) Yunus N, Rashid AA, Azmi LL, Abu-Hassan MI. Some flexural properties of a nylon denture base polymer. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 65-71.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01370.x ↗
5. 5) Bollen CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparision of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-269.10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3 ↗
6. 6) Kuhar M, Funduk N. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 76-85.10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.002 ↗
7. 7) Morgan TD, Wilson M. The effects of surface roughness and type of denture acrylic on biofilm formation by streptococcus oralis in a constant depth film fermentor. J Appl Microbiol 2001; 91: 47-53.10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01338.x ↗
8. 8) Charman KM, Fernandez P, Loewy Z, Middleton AM. Attachment of streptococcus oralis on acrylic substrates of varying roughness. Lett Appl Microbiol 2009; 48: 472-427.10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02551.x ↗
9. 9) Lou MS, Chen JC, Li CM. Surface roughness prediction technique for CNC end-milling. J Ind Technol 1998; 15: 1-6.
10. 10) Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short term observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 169-178.
11. 11) Bollen CML, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, Schepers E, Quirynen M,Van Steenberghe D. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 201-211.10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070302.x ↗
12. 12) Borchers L, Tavassol F, Tschernitschek H. Surface quality achieved by polishing and by varnishing of temporary crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 550-556.10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70053-3 ↗
13. 14) Nalbant AD, Kalkanci A, Filiz B, Kustimur S. Effectiveness of different cleaning agents against the colonization of candida spp and the in vitro detection of the adherence of these yeast cells to denture acrylic surfaces. Yonsei Med J 2008; 49: 647-654.10.3349/ymj.2008.49.4.647 ↗
14. 16) Paranhos HFO, Silva-Lovato CH, de Souza RF, Cruz PC, de Freitas-Pontes KM, Watanabe E. Ito IY. Effect of three methods for cleaning dentures on biofilms formed in vitro on acrylic resin. J Prosthodont 2009; 18: 427-431.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00450.x ↗
15. 17) Paranhos HFO, Peracini A, Pisani MX, Oliveira VC, Souza RF, Silva-Lovato CH. Color stability, surface roughness and flexural strength of an acrylic resin submitted to simulated overnight immersion in denture cleansers. Braz Dent J 2013; 24: 152-156.10.1590/0103-6440201302151 ↗
16. 18) Moura JS, da Silva WJ, Pereira T, Del Bel Cury AA, Rodrigues Garcia RC. Influence of acrylic resin polymerization methods and saliva on the adherence of four Candida species. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 205-211.10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.07.004 ↗
17. 19) Verran J, Maryan CJ. Retention of candida albicans on acrylic resin and silicone of different surface topography. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 535-539.10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70148-3 ↗
18. 20) Harrison Z, Johnson A, Douglas WI. An in vitro study into the effect of a limited range of denture cleaners on surface roughness and removal of candiada albicans from conventional heat-cured acrylic resin denture base material. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 460-467.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01250.x ↗
19. 21) Bertrand MF, Leforestier E, Muller M, Lupi-Pegurier L, Bolla M.Effect of surface penetrating sealent on surface texture and microhardness of composite resins. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 658-663.10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:6<658::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
20. 22) Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Ural C, Kulunk T. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 33-40.10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.04.012 ↗
21. 23) Dayrell A, Takahashi J, Valverde G, Consan R, Ambrosano G, Mesquita M. Effect of sealer coating on mechanical and physical properties of permanent soft lining materials. Gerodontology 2012; 29: 401-407.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00487.x ↗
22. 24) Sesma N, Lagana DC, Morimoto S, Gil C. Effect of denture surface glazing on denture plague formation. Braz Dent J 2005; 15: 55-58.
23. 25) Shay K. Denture hygiene: a review and update. J Contemp Dent Pract 2000; 1: 28-41.10.5005/jcdp-1-2-36 ↗
24. 26) Pisani MX, Macedo AP, Paranhos HFO, Silva CHL. Effect of experimental ricinus communis solution for denture cleaning on the properties of acrylic resin teeth. Braz Dent J 2012; 23: 15-21.10.1590/S0103-64402012000100003 ↗
25. 27) Sorgini DB, Silva-Lovato CH, Souza RF, Davi LR, Paranhos HFO. Abrasiveness of conventional and specific denture cleansing dentrifices. Braz Dent J 2012; 23: 154-159.10.1590/S0103-64402012000200011 ↗
26. 28) de Souza RF, Fedorowicz Z, Paranhos HFO, Silva-Lovato CH. Interventions for complete denture cleansing in adults (Protocol for a cochrane review). Cochrane Database of Systemic Rewievs 2009; 4: CD007395.10.1002/14651858.CD007395.pub2 ↗
27. 29) Estrela C, Estrela CRA, Barbin EL, Spano JCE, Marchesan MA, Pecora JD. Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Braz Dent J 2002; 13: 113-117.10.1590/S0103-64402002000200007 ↗
28. 30) da Silva FC, Kimpara ET, Mancini MN, Balducci I, Jorge AO, Koga-Ito CY. Effectiveness of six different disinfectants on removing five microbial species and effects on the topographic characteristics of acrylic resin. J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 627-633.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00358.x ↗
29. 31) de Souza Porta SR, de Lucena-Ferreira SC, da Silva WJ, Del Bel Cury AA. Evaluation of sodium hypochlorite as a denture cleanser: a clinical study. Gerodontology 2015; 32: 260-266.10.1111/ger.12104 ↗
30. 32) Salles MM, Oliveira VC, Souza RF, Silva CHL, Paranhos HF. Antimicrobial action of sodium hypochlorite and castor oil solutions for denture cleaning-in vitro evaluatiom. Braz Oral Res 2015; 29: 1-6.10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0104 ↗
31. 33) Fernandes FHCN, Orsi IA, Villabona CA. Effects of the peracetic acid and sodium hypochlorite on the colour stability and surface roughness of the denture base acrylic resins polymerized by microwave and water bath methods. Gerodontology 2013; 30: 18-25.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2012.00640.x ↗
32. 34) Hong G, Murata H, Li Y, Sadamori S, Hamada T. Influence of denture cleansers on the color stability of three types of denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101: 205-213.10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60032-9 ↗
33. 35) Davi LR, Peracini A, Ribeiro NQ, Soares RB, da Silva CHL, Paranhos HF, de Souza RF. Effect of the physical properties of acrylic resin of overnight immersion in sodium hypochlorite solution. Gerodontology 2010; 27: 297-302.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00336.x ↗
34. 36) Paranhos HFO, Davi LR, Peracini A, Soares RB, Lovato CHS, de Souza RF. Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of microwave-polymerized acrylic resin after disinfection in sodium hypochlorite solutions. Braz Dent J 2009; 20: 331-335.10.1590/S0103-64402009000400012 ↗
35. 37) Robinson JG, McCabe JF, Storer R. Denture bases: the effects of various treatments on clarity, strength and structure. J Dent 1987; 15: 159-165.10.1016/0300-5712(87)90143-6 ↗
36. 38) Ma T, Johnson GH, Gordon GE. Effects of chemical disinfectants on the surface characteristics and color of denture resins. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 197-204.10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70235-X ↗
37. 39) Peracini A, Davi LR, Ribeiro NG, Souza RF, Silva CHL, Paranhos HFO. Effect of denture cleansers on physical properties of heat-polymerized acrylic resin. J Prosthodont Res 2010; 54: 78-88.10.1016/j.jpor.2009.11.004 ↗
38. 40) Vieira AP, Senna PM, Silva WJ, Del Bel Cury AA. Longterm efficacy of denture cleansers in preventing Candida spp. Biofilm recolonization on liner surface. Braz Oral Res 2010; 24: 342-348.10.1590/S1806-83242010000300014 ↗
39. 41) Radford DR, Sweet SP, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials with different surface finishes. J Dent 1998; 26: 577-583.10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00034-1 ↗
40. 42) Ramage GR, Zalewska A, Cameron DA, Sherry L, Murray C, Finnegan MB, Loewy ZG, Jagger DC. A comparative in vitro study of two denture cleaning techniques as an effective strategy for inhibiting candida albicans on denture surfaces and reducing inflammation. J Prosthodont 2012; 21: 516-522.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00865.x ↗