Sealing moderate caries lesions with bioactive glass-ionomer: A split-mouth clinical trial
Source abstract
Abstract
Laboratory evidence has shown that 45S5 bioglass can help in dental remineralization, so its incorporation into resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) has been studied. This randomized clinical trial aimed to determine the efficacy of RMGIC enriched with 10% 45S5 bioglass (RMGIC/45S5) in preventing the progression of moderate caries lesions. Sixty-six permanent molars with moderate caries lesions, were randomly sealed with RMGIC or RMGIC/45S5. After 1, 3-6 months, patients' oral health, material behavior, and caries evolution were evaluated. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test was employed. After one month, the RMGIC showed higher total retention and better clinical performance compared to RMGIC/45S5, both showed a predominance of sealed teeth or without caries progression. After 6 months, no materials retention, quality and caries progression difference was observed for both materials. Short-term clinical follow-up reveals worse retention and quality of RMGIC/45S5, only after 6 months no clinical/microscopic differences are observed between the materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Dentistry I and Dental Post-Graduation Program, Federal University of Maranhão
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Carvalho CN, Grazziotin-Soares R, De Miranda Candeiro GT, Gallego Martinez L, de Souza JP, Santos Oliveira P, et al. Micro push-out bond strength and bioactivity analysis of a bioceramic root canal sealer. Iran Endod J 2017; 12: 343-348.
2. 2) Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, et al. Managing carious lesions: Consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv Dent Res 2016; 28: 58-67.10.1177/0022034516639271 ↗
3. 3) Ekstrand K, Gimenez T, Ferreira F, Mendes FM, Braga MM. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System–ICDAS: A systematic review. Caries Res 2018; 52: 406-419.10.1159/000486429 ↗
4. 4) da Silveira A, Borges BCD, Varela HA, de Lima KC, Pinheiro IVA.Progression of non-cavitated lesions in dentin through a nonsurgical approach: A preliminary 12-month clinical observation. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 34-42.10.1055/s-0039-1698928 ↗
5. 5) Muñoz-Sandoval C, Gambetta-Tessini K, Giacaman R. Microcavitated ( ICDAS 3) carious lesion arrest with resin or glass ionomer sealants in first permanent molars: A randomized controlled trial. J Dent 2019; 88: 103163.10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.001 ↗
6. 6) Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Walsh T, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M, et al. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2013; 28: CD001830.10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub4 ↗
7. 7) Oliveira GL, Carvalho CN, Carvalho EM, Bauer J. The influence of mixing methods on the compressive strength and fluoride release of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Int J Dent 2019; 15: 2019: 6834931.10.1155/2019/6834931 ↗
8. 8) Yli-Urpo H, Närhi M, Närhi T. Compound changes and tooth mineralization effects of glass ionomer cements containing bioactive glass (S53P4), an in vivo study. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 5934-5941.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.008 ↗
9. 9) Bauer J, Silva e Silva A, Carvalho EM, Ferreira PVC, Carvalho CN, Manso AP, et al. Dentin pretreatment with 45S5 and niobophosphate bioactive glass: Effects on pH, antibacterial, mechanical properties of the interface and microtensile bond strength. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019; 90: 374-380.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.029 ↗
10. 10) Moraes JF, de Moraes TG, Nunes FRS, Carvalho EM, Nunes GS, Carvalho CN, et al. Formation of hydroxyapatite nanoprecursors by the addition of bioactive particles in resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Int J Adhes Adhes 2021; 110: 102933.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102933 ↗
11. 11) Fernando D, Attik N, Pradelle-Plasse N, Jackson P, Grosgogeat B, Colon P. Bioactive glass for dentin remineralization: A systematic review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2017; 76: 1369-1377.10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.083 ↗
12. 12) de Oliveira Roma FRV, de Oliveira TJL, Bauer J, Firoozmand LM. Resin-modified glass ionomer enriched with BIOGLASS: Ion-release, bioactivity and antibacterial effect. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2023; 111: 903-911.10.1002/jbm.b.35200 ↗
13. 13) Sauro S, Watson T, Moscardó AP, Luzi A, Feitosa VP, Banerjee A.The effect of dentine pre-treatment using bioglass and/or polyacrylic acid on the interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent 2018; 73: 32-39.10.1016/j.jdent.2018.03.014 ↗
14. 14) Milly H, Festy F, Watson TF, Thompson I, Banerjee A. Enamel white spot lesions can remineralise using bio-active glass and polyacrylic acid-modified bio-active glass powders. J Dent 2014; 42: 158-166.10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.012 ↗
15. 15) Andersson-Wenckert I, Folkesson U, Van Dijken J. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars —A multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55: 255-260.10.3109/00016359709115424 ↗
16. 16) Cvar J, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials, US Public Health Service Publication. 1971.No 790-244 San Francisco: Government Printing Office
17. 17) Wright JT, Tampi MP, Graham L, Estrich C, Crall JJ, Fontana M, et al. Sealants for preventing and arresting pit-and-fissure occlusal caries in primary and permanent molars: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials —A report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2016; 147: 631-645.10.1016/j.adaj.2016.06.003 ↗
18. 18) Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 2011; 9: 672-677.10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004 ↗
19. 19) Simonsen R. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealant after 15 years. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 22: 34-42.10.14219/jada.archive.1991.0289 ↗
20. 20) Wilson MA, Cowan AJ, Randall RC, Crisp RJ, Wilson NH. A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: One-year results. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 423-429.
21. 21) Diniz ACS, Couto GA do, Silva TB da, Bauer JR, Firoozmand LM. Clinical behavior of bioactive glass ionomer (45S5) in moderate caries injuries: Study protocol of a clinical trial. Res Soc Dev 2021; 10: e07101018190.10.33448/rsd-v10i10.18190 ↗
22. 22) Andersson-Wenckert I, van Dijken J, Horstedt P. Interfacial adaptation of in vivo aged polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) restorations in primary molars: A SEM evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 1998; 2: 184-190.10.1007/s007840050068 ↗
23. 23) Andersson-Wenckert I, Van Dijken J, Horstedt P. Modified Class II open sandwich restorations: Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and influence of different restorative techniques. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 270-275.10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.11210.x ↗
24. 24) Wright JT, Crall JJ, Fontana M, Gillette EJ, Nový BB, Dhar V, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: A report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2016; 147: 672-682.e12.10.1016/j.adaj.2016.06.001 ↗
25. 25) Griffin SO, Oong E, Kohn W, Vidakovic B, Gooch BF; CDC Dental Sealant Systematic Review Work Group, et al. The effectiveness of sealants in managing caries lesions. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 169-174.10.1177/154405910808700211 ↗
26. 26) Brown ML, Davis HB, Tufekci E, Crowe JJ, Covell DA, Mitchell JC. Ion release from a novel orthodontic resin bonding agent for the reduction and/or prevention of white spot lesions. An in vitro study. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 1014-1020.10.2319/120710-708.1 ↗
27. 27) Diniz AC, Bauer J, Veloso SDAR, Abreu-Pereira CA, Carvalho CN, Leitão TJ, et al. Effect of bioactive filler addition on the mechanical and biological properties of resin-modified glass ionomer. Materials (Basel) 2023; 16: 1765.10.3390/ma16051765 ↗
28. 28) Ying Lam PP, Sardana D, Luo W, Ekambaram M, Man Lee GH, Man Lo EC, et al. Glass ionomer sealant versus fluoride varnish application to prevent occlusal caries in primary second molars among preschool children: A randomized controlled trial. Caries Res 2021; 55: 322-332.10.1159/000517390 ↗
29. 29) Unverdi G, Atac S, Cehreli Z. Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 2235-2243.10.1007/s00784-016-2016-8 ↗
30. 30) Schwendicke F, Tzschoppe M, Paris S. Radiographic caries detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43: 924-933.10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.009 ↗
31. 31) Sundfeld D, Machado LS, Franco LM, Salomão FM, Pini N, Sundefeld M, et al. Clinical/photographic/scanning electron microscopy analysis of pit and fissure sealants after 22 years: A case series. Oper Dent 2017; 42: 10-18.10.2341/15-237-C ↗
32. 32) de Souza Penha KJ, de Oliveira Roma FR, Aroucha Coelho LM, Maia-Filho EM, Firoozmand LM. One-year follow-up of microscopical and clinical behavior of bioactive self-etching resin sealant. J Conserv Dent 2023; 26: 188-193.