journal article·2019-09-27Open access

Effect of fiberglass orientation on flexural properties of fiberglass-reinforced composite resin block for CAD/CAM

Tohru YASUE, Naohiko IWASAKI, Maho SHIOZAWA, Yumi TSUCHIDA, Tetsuya SUZUKI, Hidekazu TAKAHASHI

Dental Materials Journal· Volume 38· Issue 5

Abstract

A fiberglass-reinforced composite resin (FRP) block using a plain woven fiberglass sheet for CAD/CAM has been introduced in dental practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of the fiberglass sheet orientation on the flexural properties of an FRP block. The flexural properties of five types of fiberglass sheet-assigned specimens were examined using a three-point bending test. A one-way analysis of variance revealed that the orientation of fiberglass sheet significantly influenced the flexural strength, 0.2% yield strength, and flexural modulus. The values of the flexural properties of the FRP were the largest when the fiberglass sheets were perpendicular to the applied force, and the smallest when the fiberglass was parallel to the same. The flexural properties of the FRP block were anisotropic and they were significantly influenced by the orientation of fiberglass sheet.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Oral Biomaterials Development Engineering, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University

Oral Prosthetic Engineering, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University

Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 1) Kolbeck C, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. In vitro examination of the fracture strength of 3 different fiber-reinforced composite and 1 all-ceramic posterior inlay fixed partial denture systems. J Prosthodont 2002; 11: 248-253.
2. 2) Pfeiffer P, Grube L. In vitro resistance of reinforced interim fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 170-174.10.1067/mpr.2003.29 ↗
3. 3) Ozcan M, Breuklander MH, Vallittu PK. The effect of box preparation on the strength of glass fiber-reinforced composite inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 337-345.10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.01.006 ↗
4. 4) Dyer SR, Sorensen JA, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Damage mechanics and load failure of fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 1104-1110.10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.001 ↗
5. 5) Xie Q, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Comparison of load-bearing capacity of direct resin-bonded fiber-reinforced composite FPDs with four framework designs. J Dent 2007; 35: 578-582.10.1016/j.jdent.2007.04.003 ↗
6. 6) Perea L, Matinlinna JP, Tolvanen M, Vallittu PK. Fracture behavior of pontics of fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater J 2015; 34: 746-753.10.4012/dmj.2015-081 ↗
7. 7) Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan P, Goldberg AJ. Fiber-reinforced composites in clinical dentistry. Illinois: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2000. p. 26-27.
8. 9) Bonfante EA, Suzuki M, Carvalho RM, Hirata R, Lubelski W, Bonfante G, et al. Digitally produced fiber-reinforced composite substructures for three-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015; 30: 321-329.10.11607/jomi.3892 ↗
9. 10) Seemann R, Marincola M, Seay D, Perisanidis C, Barger N, Ewers R. Preliminary results of fixed, fiber-reinforced resin bridges on four 4- × 5-mm ultrashort implants in compromised bony sites: a pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73: 630-640.10.1016/j.joms.2014.10.031 ↗
10. 11) Passaretti A, Petroni G, Miracolo G, Savoia V, Perpetuini A, Cicconetti A. Metal free, full arch, fixed prosthesis for edentulous mandible rehabilitation on four implants. J Prosthodont Res 2018; 62: 264-267.10.1016/j.jpor.2017.10.002 ↗
11. 12) Vallittu PK. Compositional and weave pattern analyses of glass fibers in dental polymer fiber composites. J Prosthodont 1998; 7: 170-176.10.1111/j.1532-849X.1998.tb00200.x ↗
12. 13) Sfondrini MF, Massironi S, Pieraccini G, Scribante A, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV, et al. Flexural strengths of conventional and nanofilled fiber-reinforced composites: a three-point bending test. Dent Traumatol 2014; 30: 32-35.10.1111/edt.12055 ↗
13. 14) Dyer SR, Lassila LV, Jokinen M, Vallittu PK. Effect of fiber position and orientation on fracture load of fiber-reinforced composite. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 947-955.10.1016/j.dental.2003.12.003 ↗
14. 15) Lassila L, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Säilynoja E. Mechanical properties of fiber reinforced restorative composite with two distinguished fiber length distribution. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016; 60: 331-338.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.036 ↗
15. 16) Lastumäki TM, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix of fiber-reinforced composite and its effect on the surface adhesive properties. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003; 14: 803-809.10.1023/A:1025044623421 ↗
16. 17) Khan AA, Al-Kheraif AA, Al-Shehri AM, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK. Polymer matrix of fiber-reinforced composites: Changes in the semi-interpenetrating polymer network during the shelf life. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 78: 414-419.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.038 ↗
17. 18) Iglesias JG, González-Benito J, Aznar AJ, Bravo J, Baselga J. Effect of glass fiber surface treatments on mechanical strength of epoxy based composite materials. J Colloid Interface Sci 2002; 250: 251-260.10.1006/jcis.2002.8332 ↗
18. 19) Day M, Deitzel JM, Gillespie Jr JW, Schweiger S. Influence of sizing formulations on glass/epoxy interphase properties. Composites Part A 2014; 63: 59-67.10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.006 ↗
19. 20) Mahmood H, Tripathi M, Pugno N, Pegoretti A. Enhancement of interfacial adhesion in glass fiber/epoxy composites by electrophoretic deposition of graphene oxide on glass fibers. Compos Sci Technol 2016; 126: 149-157.10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.02.016 ↗
20. 21) ISO 1172: 1996. Textile-glass-reinforced plastics. Prepregs, moulding compounds and laminates. Determination of the textile glass and mineral-filler content. Calcination methods, 2nd ed, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1996.
21. 22) Jokstad A, Gökçe M, Hjortsjö C. A systematic review of the scientific documentation of fixed partial dentures made from fiber-reinforced polymer to replace missing teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 489-496.
22. 23) Bae JM, Kim KN, Hattori M, Hasegawa K, Yoshinari M, Kawada E, et al. The flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite with light-polymerized polymer matrix. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 33-39.