The effect of Er:YAG laser and different surface conditioning procedures on microtensile bond strength of the fissure sealant containing amorphous calcium phosphate after artificial aging
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare post-aging microtensile values of fissure sealant(FS) containing amorphous calcium phosphate(ACP) with or without bonding after various enamel-etching methods. The buccal enamel surfaces of teeth were prepared and divided into five main groups according to enamel etching (Group 1; acid-etching, Group 2; air-abrasion, Group 3; 2W, Group 4; 3W, and Group 5; 4W of Er:YAG laser). Each main group was subdivided as with(Subgroup B) or without(Subgroup A) a bonding system. We applied FS-containing ACP to etched enamel surfaces. All specimens were aged by Thermocycling and water bath. We then measured microtensile bond strengths and analyzed data with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests. We found a statistically significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2, between Subgroup B of Group 5 and Subgroups B of all other groups, and between Subgroups A and Subgroups B of all main groups (p<0.01). Er:YAG laser-etching may be an alternative enamel etching method to acid-etching for ACP-containing FS.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM. Epidemiology of dental caries in the pediatric and adolescent population: a review of past and current trends. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1993; 18: 43-49.
2. 2) Simonsen RJ. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 393-414.
3. 3) Simonsen RJ. Cost effectiveness of pit and fissure sealant at 10 years. Quintessence Int 1989; 20: 75-82.
4. 4) Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-853.10.1177/00220345550340060801 ↗
5. 5) Foster JA, Berzins DW, Bradley TG. Bond strength of an amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic adhesive. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 339-344.10.2319/020807-60 ↗
6. 6) Skrtic D, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED. Improved properties of amorphous calcium phosphate fillers in remineralizing resin composites. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 295-301.10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80037-6 ↗
7. 7) Skrtic D, Antonucci JM, McDonough WG, Liu DW. Effect of chemical structure and composition of the resin phase on mechanical strength and vinyl conversion of amorphous calcium phosphate-based composites. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 68: 763-772.10.1002/jbm.a.20111 ↗
8. 8) Silva KG, Pedrini D, Delbem AC, Ferreira L, Cannon M. In situ evaluation of the remineralizing capacity of pit and fissure sealants containing amorphous calcium phosphate and/or fluoride. Acta Odontol Scand 2010; 68: 11-18.10.3109/00016350903260264 ↗
9. 9) Manhart J, Huth KC, Chen HY, Hickel R. Influence of the pretreatment of occlusal pits and fissures on the retention of a fissure sealant. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 12-18.
10. 10) Andlaw RJ, Rock WP. Pit and fissure sealants. A manual of paediatric dentistry. 4th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. p. 57-61.
11. 11) Hatibovic-Kofman S, Wright GZ, Braverman I. Microleakage of sealants after conventional, bur, and air-abrasion preparation of pits and fissures. Pediatr Dent 1998; 20: 173-176.
12. 12) Berry EA 3rd, Ward M. Bond strength of resin composite to air-abraded enamel. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 559-562.
13. 13) Hibst R, Keller U. Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med 1989; 9: 338-344.10.1002/lsm.1900090405 ↗
14. 14) Feigal RJ, Donly KJ. The use of pit and fissure sealants. Pediatr Dent 2006; 28: 143-150.
15. 15) do Rego MA, de Araujo MA. Microleakage evaluation of pit and fissure sealants done with different procedures, materials, and laser after invasive technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1999; 24: 63-68.
16. 16) Feigal RJ, Musherure P, Gillespie B, Levy-Polack M, Quelhas I, Hebling J. Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: a clinical study of two-bottle and single-bottle systems. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1850-1856.10.1177/00220345000790110601 ↗
17. 17) Hitt JC, Feigal RJ. Use of a bonding agent to reduce sealant sensitivity to moisture contamination: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 1992; 14: 41-46.
18. 18) Borem LM, Feigal RJ. Reducing microleakage of sealants under salivary contamination: digital-image analysis evaluation. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 283-289.
19. 19) Feigal RJ, Hitt J, Splieth C. Retaining sealant on salivary contaminated enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124: 88-97.10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0069 ↗
20. 20) Perdigao J, Fundingsland JW, Duarte S Jr, Lopes M. Microtensile adhesion of sealants to intact enamel. Int J Paediatr Dent 2005; 15: 342-348.10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00623.x ↗
21. 21) Sen Tunc E, Bayrak S, Tuloglu N, Ertas E. Evaluation of microtensile bond strength of different fissure sealants to bovine enamel. Aust Dent J 2012; 57: 79-84.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01639.x ↗
22. 22) Knobloch LA, Meyer T, Kebery RE, Johnston W. Microleakage and bond strenght of primary enamel comparing air abrasion and acid etch techniques. Pediatr Dent 2005; 27: 463-469.
23. 23) Moslemi M, Erfanparast L, Fekrazad R, Tadayon N, Dadjo H, Shadkar MM, Khalili Z. The effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and air abrasion on shear bond strenght of a fissure sealant to enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141: 157-161.10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0133 ↗
24. 24) Chimello-Sousa DT, de Souza AE, Chinelatti MA, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, Milori Corona SA. Influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation distance on the bond strength of a restorative system to enamel. J Dent 2006; 34: 245-251.10.1016/j.jdent.2005.06.009 ↗
25. 25) Shahabi S, Bagheri HG, Ramazani K. Tensile bond strength of sealants following Er:YAG laser etching compared to acid etching in permanent teeth. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 371-375.10.1007/s10103-010-0869-7 ↗
26. 26) Asselin ME, Sitbon Y, Fortin D, Abelardo L, Rompre PH. Bond strength of a sealant to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols. Pediatr Dent 2009; 31: 323-328.
27. 27) Venker DJ, Kuthy RA, Qian F, Kanellis MJ. Twelve-month sealant retention in a school-based program using a self etching primer/adhesive. J Public Health Dent 2004; 64: 191-197.10.1111/j.1752-7325.2004.tb02752.x ↗
28. 28) Burbrıdge L, Nugent Z, Deery C. A randomized controllde trial of the effectiveness of a one-step conditioning agent in sealant placement: 6-month results. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006; 16: 424-430.10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00764.x ↗
29. 29) Hebling J, Feigal RJ. Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 187-191.
30. 30) Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Enamel bond strenghts of “one-bottle” adhesives. Pediatr Dent 1998; 20: 259-262.