journal article·2010Open access

Measurement of shear bond strength to intact dentin

Mizuho KUSUNOKI, Kazuo ITOH, Misa OIKAWA, Hisashi HISAMITSU

Dental Materials Journal· Volume 29· Issue 2

Abstract

Previously, we reported that the integrity of a resin composite restoration deteriorated when the dentin cavity wall was decalcified by conditioning. In this study, to evaluate the bonding between dentin adhesive and non-decalcified dentin surface, we experimented with a novel method of using a high-pressure water spray device to prepare smear layer-free dentin surfaces. When the smear layer was removed, shear bond strength significantly increased regardless of the removal method employed. Further, with glyceryl monomethacrylate (GM) priming, no significant differences in bond strength were observed among these smear layer removal methods: ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) conditioning, phosphoric acid conditioning, and removal by water spray. It was also found that GM priming was key to achieving marginal integrity, whereas contraction gap width increased with phosphoric acid conditioning. It was thus concluded that the efficacy of a dentin adhesive should be evaluated by consistently observing the contraction gap in three-dimensional cavities rather than by mere measurement of bond strength to a flat dentin surface.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Dental Trauma and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 1) Munksgaard EC, Asmussen E. Bond strength between dentin and restorative resins mediated by mixtures of HEMA and glutaraldehyde. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1087-1089.10.1177/00220345840630081701 ↗
2. 2) Asmussen E, Munksgaard EC. Bonding of restorative resins to dentine promoted by aqueous mixtures of aldehydes and active monomers. Int Dent J 1985; 35: 160-165.
3. ITOH Kazuo · 1987 · 6 · 2810.4012/dmj.6.28 ↗
4. 4) Chigira H, Manabe A, Itoh K, Wakumoto S, Hayakawa T. Efficacy of glyceryl methacrylate as a dentin primer. Dent Mater J 1989; 8: 194-19910.4012/dmj.8.194 ↗
5. 5) Manabe A, Katsuno K, Itoh K, Wakumoto S, Miyasaka T. Bonding efficacy of erythritol methacrylate solution as dentin primers. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 1294-1298.10.1177/00220345910700091201 ↗
6. 6) Yokoi K, Katsuno K, Manabe A, Itoh K, Wakumoto S, Hisamitsu H, Miyasaka T. Efficacy of dentin primers composed of esterified methacrylate. 2nd International Congress On Dental Materials Transaction 1993; 282.
7. 10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00009-710.1016/S0300-5712(96)00009-7 ↗
8. 8) Rahman MA, Tani C, Itoh K, Wakumoto S, Hisamitsu H. Optimum concentration and application time of 1,6 hexandiol as a dentin primer. Dent Mater 1995; 14: 230-235.10.4012/dmj.14.230 ↗
9. 10.4012/dmj.26.47410.4012/dmj.26.474 ↗
10. 10) Sugizaki J. The effect of the various primers on the dentin adhesion of resin composites — SEM and TEM by observation of the resin-impregnated layer and adhesion promoting effect of the primers. Japan J Conserv Dent 1991; 34: 228-265.
11. 10.1002/jbm.82016030710.1002/jbm.820160307 ↗
12. 12) Kanca J. Improving bond strength through acid etching of dentin and bonding to wet dentin surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123: 35-43.10.14219/jada.archive.1992.0248 ↗
13. 13) Gwinnett AJ, Kanca JA. Micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and its relationship to bond strength. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 73-77.
14. 14) Chiba M, Itoh K, Wakumoto S. Effect of dentin cleansers on the bonding efficacy of dentin adhesive. Dent Mater J 1989; 8: 76-85.10.4012/dmj.8.76 ↗
15. MANABE A · 1999 · 18 · 11610.4012/dmj.18.116 ↗
16. 16) Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-853.10.1177/00220345550340060801 ↗
17. 17) Kato Y, Tani C, Itoh K, Hisamitsu H. The effect of dentin hardness reduction by EDTA conditioning on efficacy of dentin surface. Japan J Conserv Dent -The Autumn Meeting in 2008 (the 129th) in Toyama on 2008-11-7. Japan J Conserv Dent the autumn meeting program p187, http://wwwsoc.nil.ac.jp/jscd/member/ pdf/abstract 129/p122_ re.pdf. (accessed 2009-7-31)
18. 18) Teduka A, Tani C, Itoh K, Hisamitsu H. Relationship between decalcified dentin thickness and contraction gap width. Japan J Conserv Dent the Spring Meeting in 2009 (the 130th) in Sapporo 2009-6-12, Japan J Conserv Dent - The Autumn Meeting Program, p.102; http://wwwsoc.nil. ac.jp/jscd/member/ pdf/abstract 130/p24_re.pdf (accessed 2009-7-31).
19. WU J · 1998 · 17 · 2110.4012/dmj.17.21 ↗
20. TANI C · 2001 · 20 · 35910.4012/dmj.20.359 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00003-910.1016/S0300-5712(02)00003-9 ↗
22. 22) Wu J, Itoh K, Yamashita T, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S. The efficacy of the dentin adhesive to the caries-affected dentin. The Journal of Showa University Dental Society 2003; 23: 166-174.
23. 23) Sherman MR, Williams LD, Saifer MGP, French JA, Kwak LW, Oppenheim JJ. Conjugation of high-molecular weight polyethylene glycol to cytokines: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors as model substrates. 213th National Meeting of American Chemical Society 1997; 155-168.10.1021/bk-1997-0680.ch011 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00283-510.1016/S0142-9612(99)00283-5 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80198-410.1016/S0099-2399(86)80198-4 ↗
26. 26) Tagami J, Hosoda H, Imai Y, Masuhara E. Evaluation of a new adhesive liner as an adhesive promoter and a desensitizer on hypersensitive dentin. Dent Mater 1987; 6: 201-208.10.4012/dmj.6.201 ↗
27. 27) Watanabe T, Sano M, Itoh K, Wakumoto S. The effects of primers on the sensitivity of dentin. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 148-150.10.1016/0109-5641(91)90033-U ↗