Influence of composition and powder/water ratio on adhesion strength and initial viscosity of powder-type denture adhesives based on CMC-Na and PVM-MA
Source abstract
Abstract
We evaluated the influence of the composition and powder/water (P/W) ratio of powder-type denture adhesives (DA) based on sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC-Na) and poly(methyl vinyl ether-maleic anhydride) (PVM-MA) on the strength of adhesion to acrylic resin and initial viscosity. Twenty types of DA were prepared by mixing CMC-Na and PVM-MA at various weight ratios with distilled water in P/W ratios ranging from 0.125 to 0.500. Adhesion strength and viscosity were measured using a universal testing machine and a controlled-stress rheometer, respectively. A higher percentage of CMC-Na and higher P/W ratios resulted in higher adhesion strength and viscosity. The effect of the CMC-Na/PVM-MA weight ratio on adhesion strength and viscosity was larger than that of the P/W ratio. DA with higher viscosity had higher adhesion strength. These results suggest that the adhesion strength and initial viscosity of powder-type DA can be controlled via the P/W ratio and the CMC-Na/PVM-MA weight ratio.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Ivanhoe JR, Cibirka RM, Parr GR. Treating the modern complete denture patient: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 631-635.10.1067/mpr.2002.130147 ↗
2. 2) Slaughter A, Katz RV, Grasso JE. Professional attitudes toward denture adhesives: A Delphi Technique survey of academic prosthodontists. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 80-89.10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70131-9 ↗
3. 3) The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices. A glossary for dental materials and devices. Tokyo: Ishiyaku Publishers Inc; 2005. p.20.
4. 4) International Organization for Standardization (2010) ISO 10873. Dentistry-Denture adhesives.
5. 5) Kelsey CC, Lang BR, Wang RF. Examining patients’ responses about the effectiveness of five denture adhesive pastes. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 1532-1538.10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0093 ↗
6. 6) Uysal H, Altay OT, Alparslan N, Bilge A. Comparison of four different denture cushion adhesives: a subjective study. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 209-213.10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00220.x ↗
7. 7) Ozcan M, Kulak Y, Arikan A, Silahtar E. The attitude of complete denture wearers towards denture adhesives in Istanbul. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 131-134.10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01224.x ↗
8. 8) Nicolas E, Veyrune JL, Lassauzay C. A six-month assessment of oral health-related quality of life of complete denture wearers using denture adhesive: a pilot study. J Prosthodont 2010; 19: 443-448.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00601.x ↗
9. 9) Polyzois GL, de Baat C. Attitudes and usage of denture adhesives by complete denture wearers: a survey in Greece and the Netherlands. Gerodontology 2012; 29: 807-814.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00566.x ↗
10. 10) Papadiochou S, Emmanouil I, Papadiochos I. Denture adhesives: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 113: 391-397.10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.001 ↗
11. 11) Grasso JE, Rendell J, Gay T. Effect of denture adhesive on the retention and stability of maxillary dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 399-405.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90560-6 ↗
12. 12) Pradies G, Sanz I, Evans O, Martnez F, Sanz M. Clinical study comparing the efficacy of two denture adhesives in complete denture patients. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 361-367.
13. 13) Munoz CA, Gendreau L, Shanga G, Magnuszewski T, Fernandez P, Durocher J. A clinical study to evaluate denture adhesive use in well-fitting dentures. J Prosthodont 2012; 21: 123-129.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00795.x ↗
14. 14) Rendell JK, Gay T, Grasso JE, Baker RA, Winston JL. The effect of denture adhesive on mandibular movement during chewing. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 981-986.10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0316 ↗
15. 15) Gonçalves TM, Viu FC, Gonçalves LM, Garcia RC. Denture adhesives improve mastication in denture wearers. Int J Prosthodont 2014; 27: 140-146.10.11607/ijp.3674 ↗
16. 16) de Oliveira Jr NM, Rodriguez LS, Mendoza Marin DO, Paleari AG, Pero AC, Compagnoni MA. Masticatory performance of complete denture wearers after using two adhesives: a crossover randomized clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1182-1187.10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.004 ↗
17. 17) Sipahi C, Beyzadeoglu M, Demirtas S, Ozen J. Effect of different mucosal and acrylic resin surface treatments in a denture retention model for patients with radiotherapy-induced xerostomia. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 405-408.
18. 18) Bogucki ZA, Napadlek P, Dabrowa T. A clinical evaluation denture adhesives used by patients with xerostomia. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94: 545.10.1097/MD.0000000000000545 ↗
19. 19) Bartlett DW, Maggio B, Targett D, Fenlon MR, Thomas J Thomas. A preliminary investigation into the use of denture adhesives combined with dietary advice to improve diets in complete denture wearers. J Dent 2013; 41: 143-147.10.1016/j.jdent.2012.10.012 ↗
20. 20) Woelfel JB, Kreider JA. Home reliner ruins dentures and causes shrinkage. J Prosthet Dent 1968; 20: 319-325.10.1016/0022-3913(68)90226-6 ↗
21. 21) Felton D, Cooper L, Duqum I, Minsley G, Guckes A, Haug S, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the care and maintenance of complete dentures: a publication of the American College of Prosthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142 Suppl 1: 1S-20S.10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0067 ↗
22. 22) Murata H, Hong G, Yamakado C, Kurogi T, Kano H, Hamada T.Dynamic viscoelastic properties, water absorption, and solubility of home reliners. Dent Mater J 2010; 29: 554-561.10.4012/dmj.2010-012 ↗
23. 23) Ellinger CW. Extensive damage to the lower ridge caused by use of home reliner by a patient. Fortn Rev Chic Dent Soc 1965; 49: 13-15.
24. 24) Ellis B, Al-Nakash S, Lamb DJ. The composition and rheology of denture adhesives. J Dent 1980; 8: 109-118.10.1016/0300-5712(80)90025-1 ↗
25. 25) Takahashi H. Type and characteristics of denture adhesives. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 2003; 47: 474-483.10.2186/jjps.47.474 ↗
26. 26) Love WB, Biswas S. Denture adhesives: pH and buffering capacity. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 356-360.10.1016/0022-3913(91)90263-V ↗
27. 27) Panagiotouni E, Pissiotis A, Kapari D, Kaloyannides A. Retentive ability of various denture adhesive materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 578-585.10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80120-9 ↗
28. 28) Kano H, Kurogi T, Shimizu T, Nishimura M, Murata H. Viscosity and adhesion strength of cream-type denture adhesives and mouth moisturizers. Dent Mater J 2012; 31: 960-968.10.4012/dmj.2012-004 ↗
29. 29) Han JM, Hong G, Hayashida K, Maeda T, Murata H, Sasaki K. Influence of composition on the adhesive strength and initial viscosity of denture adhesives. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 98-103.10.4012/dmj.2013-178 ↗
30. 30) Iida Y. Physical factors in denture retention. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1975; 22: 113-125.
31. 31) Miyata T. A study on denture-base fitness of extention-base partial dentures. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 1976; 20: 694-710.10.2186/jjps.20.694 ↗
32. 32) al-Athel MS, Jagger RG. Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 535-540.10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90014-1 ↗
33. 33) Lamb DJ, Craig GT. Demineralization of human dental enamel by karaya gum solutions. Caries Res 1982; 16: 118-122.10.1159/000260587 ↗
34. 34) Mamdouh T. Ghannam, Nabil Esmail. Rheological properties of carboxymethyl cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 1997; 64: 289-301.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970411)64:2<289::AID-APP9>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
35. 35) Jacqueline IK. Concise encyclopedia of polymer science and engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1990.