journal article·2012Open access

Relation between incremental lines and tensile strength of coronal dentin

Toshiko INOUE, Makoto SAITO, Masato YAMAMOTO, Fumio NISHIMURA, Takashi MIYAZAKI

Dental Materials Journal· Volume 31· Issue 4

Abstract

In one aspect, this study examined the tensile strength of coronal dentin, as a function of the location of incremental lines, in two types of teeth: human molar versus bovine incisor. In another aspect, tensile strength in coronal dentin was examined with tensile loading in two different orientations to the incremental lines: parallel versus perpendicular. There were four experimental groups in this study: HPa, human molar dentin with tensile orientation parallel to the incremental lines; HPe, human molar dentin with tensile orientation perpendicular to the incremental lines; BPa, bovine incisor dentin with tensile orientation parallel to the incremental lines; BPe, bovine incisor dentin with tensile orientation perpendicular to the incremental lines. Tensile strengths of the parallel group (HPa and BPa) were significantly higher (p<0.05) than those of the perpendicular group (HPe and BPe). Effect of structural anisotropy, contributed by the incremental lines, was thus confirmed in coronal dentin. However, there were no differences in anisotropy effect between the two tooth types.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 1) Kinney JH, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The mechanical properties of human dentin: a critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003; 14: 13- 29.10.1177/154411130301400103 ↗
2. 2) Wang R, Weiner S. Human root dentin: structural anisotropy and Vickers microhardness isotropy. Connect Tissue Res 1998; 39: 269-279.10.3109/03008209809021502 ↗
3. 3) Carvalho RM, Fernandes CA, Villanueva R, Wang L, Pashley DH. Tensile strength of human dentin as a function of tubule orientation and density. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 309-314.
4. 4) Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Anisotropy of tensile strength of root dentin. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 453- 456.10.1177/00220345010800021001 ↗
5. 10.4012/dmj.21.3210.4012/dmj.21.32 ↗
6. 10.4012/dmj.21.7310.4012/dmj.21.73 ↗
7. 10.4012/dmj.22.3910.4012/dmj.22.39 ↗
8. 8) Iwamoto N, Ruse ND. Fracture toughness of human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 66: 507-512.10.1002/jbm.a.10005 ↗
9. 9) Bedran-de-Castro AK, Pereira PN, Thompson JY. Infl uence of load cycling and tubule orientation on ultimate tensile strength of dentin. J Adhes Dent 2004; 6: 191-194.
10. 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00110-610.1016/S0109-5641(03)00110-6 ↗
11. 12) Katz JL, Kinney JH, Spencer P, Wang Y, Fricke B, Walker MP, Friis EA. Elastic anisotropy of bone and dentitional tissues. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005; 16: 803-806.10.1007/s10856-005-3579-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.00810.1016/j.dental.2004.07.008 ↗
13. 14) Arola D, Reid J, Cox ME, Bajaj D, Sundaram N, Romberg E.Transition behavior in fatigue of human dentin: structure and anisotropy. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3867-3875.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.001 ↗
14. 15) Owen R. Odontography; or, A treatise on the comparative anatomy of the teeth: their physiological relations, mode of development, and microscopic structure in the vertebrate animals. London: Hyppolyte Bailliere; 1840. p. 296-308.10.5962/bhl.title.113905 ↗
15. 16) Andresen V. Die querstreifung des dentins. Deutsche monatsschrift fur zahnheilkunde. Leipzig: Sechzehnter Jahrgang; 1898. p. 386-389.
16. 17) Ebner V von R. Uber die Entwicklung der leimgebenden Fibrillen im Zahnbein (Development of collagenous fibrils in the dentin). Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften; 1906. p. 281-349.
17. 18) Jones SJ, Boyde A. In: Linde A, editor. Dentin and dentinogenesis. Boca Ranton: CRC Press; 1984. p. 81-134.
18. 19) Tonami K, Takahashi H, Nishimura F. Effect of frozen storage and boiling on tensile strength of bovine dentin. Dent Mater J 1996; 15: 205-211.10.4012/dmj.15.205 ↗
19. 20) Currey JD, Brear K, Zioupos P. Dependence of mechanical properties on fibre angle in narwhal tusk, a highly oriented biological composite. J Biomech 1994; 27: 885-897.10.1016/0021-9290(94)90261-5 ↗
20. 21) Nalla RK, Kinney JH, Ritchie RO. Effect of orientation on the in vitro fracture toughness of dentin: the role of toughening mechanisms. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 3955-3968.10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00278-3 ↗
21. 23) Tonami K, Takahashi H. Effects of aging on tensile fatigue strength of bovine dentin. Dent Mater J 1997; 16: 156-169.10.4012/dmj.16.156 ↗
22. 10.4012/dmj.26.34810.4012/dmj.26.348 ↗
23. 10.1089/pho.2005.23.27810.1089/pho.2005.23.278 ↗
24. 27) Perdigao J, Thompson JY, Toledano M, Osorio R. An ultramorphological characterization of collagen-depleted etched dentin. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 250-255.
25. 10.1177/15440591040830051310.1177/154405910408300513 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.01.01510.1016/j.jdent.2004.01.015 ↗
27. 30) Betamar N, Cardew G, Van Noort R. Influence of specimen designs on the microtensile bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 159-168.
28. 31) Soares CJ, Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Armstrong SR. Microtensile specimen attachment and shape 窶杷inite element analysis. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 89-93.10.1177/154405910808700116 ↗
29. 32) Jameson MW, Hood JAA, Tidmarsh BG. The effects of dehydration and rehydration on some mechanical properties of human dentin. J Biomech 1993; 26: 1055-1065.10.1016/S0021-9290(05)80005-3 ↗