Characteristics of low polymerization shrinkage flowable resin composites in newly-developed cavity base materials for bulk filling technique
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate polymerization shrinkage and other physical properties of newly-developed cavity base materials for bulk filling technique, with the brand name BULK BASE (BBS). Polymerization shrinkage was measured according to ISO/FDIS 17304. BBS showed the significantly lowest polymerization shrinkage and significantly higher depth of cure than conventional flowable resin composites (p<0.05). The Knoop hardness, flexural strength and elastic modulus of that were significantly lower than conventional flowable resin composites (p<0.05). BBS had the significantly greatest filler content (p<0.05). SEM images of the surface showed failure of fillers. The lowest polymerization shrinkage was due to the incorporation of a new type of low shrinkage monomer, which has urethane moieties. There were no clear correlations between inorganic filler contents and polymerization shrinkage, flexural strength and elastic modulus. In conclusion, the low polymerization shrinkage of BBS will be useful for cavity treatment in dental clinics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Dental Engineering, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine
Tsubota Dental Clinic
Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine
Sun Medical
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift Jr EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 567-577.10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0274 ↗
2. 2) Lee IB, Min SH, Kim SY, Ferracane J. Slumping tendency and rheological properties of flowable composites. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 443-448.10.1016/j.dental.2010.01.003 ↗
3. 3) Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable resin composites: A systematic review and clinical considerations. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: ZE18-24.10.7860/JCDR/2015/12294.6129 ↗
4. 4) Ilie N, Hickel R. Resin composite restorative materials. Aust Dent J 2011; 56 (1 Suppl): 59-66.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01296.x ↗
5. 5) Boruziniat A, Gharaee S, Sarraf Shirazi A, Majidinia S, Vatanpour M. Evaluation of the efficacy of flowable composite as lining material on microleakage of composite resin restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int 2016; 47: 93-101.
6. 6) Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 348-355.10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.014 ↗
7. 7) Colak H, Ercan E, Hamidi MM. Shear bond strength of bulk-fill and nano-restorative materials to dentin. Eur J Dent 2016; 10: 40-45.10.4103/1305-7456.175697 ↗
8. 8) Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 227-235.10.1007/s00784-012-0702-8 ↗
9. 9) Ku RM, Ko CC, Jeong CM, Park MG, Kim HI, Kwon YH. Effect of flowability on the flow rate, polymerization shrinkage, and mass change of flowable composites. Dent Mater J 2015; 34: 168-174.10.4012/dmj.2014-178 ↗
10. 10) Stansbury JW. Synthesis and evaluation of new oxaspiro monomers for double ring-opening polymerization. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1408-1412.10.1177/00220345920710070901 ↗
11. 11) Miyazaki K, Takata T, Endo T, Inanaga A. Thermal- and photo-polymerization of (meth) acrylates containing a spiro ortho ester moiety and the properties of poly[(meth)acrylate]s. Dent Mater J 1994; 13: 9-18.10.4012/dmj.13.9 ↗
12. 12) Moon EJ, Lee JY, Kim CK, Cho BH. Dental restorative composites containing 2,2-bis-[4-(2-hydroxy-3-methacryloyloxy propoxy) phenyl] propane derivatives and spiro orthocarbonates. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 73: 338-346.10.1002/jbm.b.30222 ↗
13. 13) Acosta Ortiz R, Reyna Medina LA, Berlanga Duarte ML, Ibarra Samaniego L, Garcia Valdez AE, García Mendez ZL, Mendez Gonzalez L. Synthesis of glycerol-derived diallyl spiroorthocarbonates and the study of their antishrinking properties in acrylic dental resins. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2013; 24: 2077-2084.10.1007/s10856-013-4959-5 ↗
14. 14) Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 68-74.10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.007 ↗
15. 15) Chen MH, Chen CR, Hsu SH, Sun SP, Su WF. Low shrinkage light curable nanocomposite for dental restorative material. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 138-145.10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.012 ↗
16. 16) Boaro LC, Gonçalves F, Guimarães TC, Ferracane JL, Pfeifer CS, Braga RR. Sorption, solubility, shrinkage and mechanical properties of “low-shrinkage” commercial resin composites. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 398-404.10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.006 ↗
17. 17) Park JK, Lee GH, Kim JH, Park MG, Ko CC, Kim HI, Kwon YH. Polymerization shrinkage, flexural and compression properties of low-shrinkage dental resin composites. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 104-110.10.4012/dmj.2013-126 ↗
18. 18) MITSUI CHEMICALS. DENTAL MATERIAL COMPOSITION, DENTAL REPAIR MATERIAL, AND CURED PRODUCT. WO2012/157566, 2012-11-22.
19. 19) ISO/FDIS 17304(2013). Dentistry-Polymerization shrinkage: Method for determination of polymerization shrinkage of polymer-based restorative materials. International Organization for Standardization.
20. 20) ISO 4049(1978). Dentistry-polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. International Organization for Standardization.
21. 21) de Gee AJ, Davidson CL, Smith A. A modified dilatometer for continuous recording of volumetric polymerization shrinkage of composite restorative materials. J Dent 1981; 9: 36-42.10.1016/0300-5712(81)90033-6 ↗
22. 22) Watts DC, Cash AJ. Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible-light-cured materials: methods development. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 281-287.10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80030-2 ↗
23. 23) Watts DC, Marouf AS. Optimal specimen geometry in bonded-disk shrinkage-strain measurements on light-cured biomaterials. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 447-451.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00043-9 ↗
24. 24) Sharp LJ, Choi IB, Lee TE, Sy A, Suh BI. Volumetric shrinkage of composites using video-imaging. J Dent 2003; 31: 97-103.10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00005-8 ↗
25. 25) Tiba A, Charlton DG, Vandewalle KS, Ragain Jr JC. Comparison of two video-imaging instruments for measuring volumetric shrinkage of dental resin composites. J Dent 2005; 33: 757-763.10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.004 ↗
26. 26) Sakaguchi RL, Wiltbank BD, Shah NC. Critical configuration analysis of four methods for measuring polymerization shrinkage strain of composites. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 388-396.10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.002 ↗
27. 27) Pereira RA, Araujo PA, Castañeda-Espinosa JC, Mondelli RF. Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16: 30-34.10.1590/S1678-77572008000100007 ↗
28. 28) de Gee AF, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determined with a linometer. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 11-14.10.1016/0109-5641(93)90097-A ↗
29. 29) Miyazaki M, Ninoura K, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of light intensity on shear bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 245-248.
30. 30) de Melo Monteiro GQ, Montes MA, Rolim TV, de Oliveira Mota CC, de Barros Correia Kyotoku B, Gomes AS, de Freitas AZ. Alternative methods for determining shrinkage in restorative resin composites. Dent Mater 2011; 27: e176-185.10.1016/j.dental.2011.04.014 ↗
31. 31) Cook WD, Forrest M, Goodwin AA. A simple method for the measurement of polymerization shrinkage in dental composites. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 447-449.10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00073-1 ↗
32. 32) Masudi SM, Syafiuddin T, Osakabe T, Shimomura H, Toko T, Hisamatsu H, Wakumoto S, Fujishima A. Basic and clinical studies on polyfunctional composite resin material-Polymerization shirinkage and tensile strength of the polyfunctional based monomer. J Showa Univ Dent Soc 1991; 11: 133-136.
33. 33) Abzal MS, Rathakrishnan M, Prakash V, Vivekanandhan P, Subbiya A, Sukumaran VG. Evaluation of surface roughness of three different composite resins with three different polishing systems. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19: 171-174.10.4103/0972-0707.178703 ↗
34. 34) Kumari CM, Bhat KM, Bansal R. Ecaluation of surface roughness of different restorative composites after polishing using atomic force microscopy. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19: 56-62.10.4103/0972-0707.173200 ↗
35. 35) Marghalani HY. Effect of filler particles on surface roughness of experimental composite series. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18: 59-67.10.1590/S1678-77572010000100011 ↗
36. 36) Ryba TM, Dunn WJ Murchison DF. Surface roughness of various packable composites. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 243-247.
37. 37) Nomoto R, Uchida K, Hirasawa T. Effect of light intensity on polymerization of light-cured composite resins. Dent Mater J 1994; 13: 198-205.10.4012/dmj.13.198 ↗
38. 38) Bechtold J, Dos Santos PJ, Anido-Anido A, Di Hipólito V, Alonso RC, D’Alpino PH. Hardness, polymerization depth, and internal adaptation of Class II silorane composite restorations as a function of polymerization protocol. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 133-140.10.1055/s-0039-1698942 ↗
39. 39) Lee IB, Min SH, Seo DG. A new method to measure the polymerization shrinkage kinetics of composites using a particle tracking method with computer vision. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 212-218.10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.005 ↗