Effects of aging and HEMA content on the translucency, fluorescence, and opalescence properties of experimental HEMA-added glass ionomers
Source abstract
Abstract
Changes in the translucency, fluorescence, and opalescence of experimental 10-50% 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)-added glass ionomers (HAGIs) after 5,000 cycles of thermocycling were determined and compared with those of commercial resin-modified glass ionomers (RMGIs). Changes in the translucency (TP), fluorescence (FL), and opalescence (OP) parameters were in the range of -3.5 to 0.2, -2.3 to 0.3 and -2.6 to 9.1 units respectively for HAGIs; and -0.9 to 0.3, -0.7 to 0.6, and 1.1 to 2.3 units respectively for RMGIs. Changes in the TP, FL, and OP of HAGIs were influenced by the HEMA content and powder shade, and were generally larger than those of RMGIs. Since the changes in TP, FL, and OP of experimental HAGIs were influenced by the HEMA content, there arises a need to determine the optimal HEMA ratio to attain high stability for these optical properties. In addition, results of this study showed that apart from optimal HEMA ratio, future studies should include other aspects and factors that contribute to age-dependent changes in optical properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Conservation Techniques and Studies · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00010-X10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00010-X ↗
2. 2) Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Restorative dental materials, 12th ed, Mosby, St. Louis, 2006, pp.35-42.
3. 3) Cattani-Lorente MA, Godin C, Meyer JM. Early strength of glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 57-62.10.1016/0109-5641(93)90107-2 ↗
4. 4) Charbeneau GT, Bozell RR 3rd. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement for restoration of cervical erosion. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 98: 936-939.10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0194 ↗
5. 5) Braden M, Clarke RL, Nicholson J, Parker S. Polymeric dental materials, Springer, Berlin, 1997.10.1007/978-3-642-60537-6 ↗
6. 6) Mount GJ, Papageorgiou E. Some curing properties of light activated glass ionomer cement. Aust Dent J 1992; 37: 309-310.
7. 7) Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glassionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 607-614.
8. 8) Lim HN, Kim SH, Yu B, Lee YK. Influence of HEMA content on the mechanical and bonding properties of experimental HEMA-added glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17: 340-349.10.1590/S1678-77572009000400013 ↗
9. 9) Johnston WM, Ma T, Kienle BH. Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 79-86.
10. 10) Yu B, Lee YK. Translucency of varied brand and shade of resin composites. Am J Dent 2009; 21: 229-232.
11. 11) Yu B, Ahn JS, Lee YK . Measurement of translucency of tooth enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2009; 67: 57-64.10.1080/00016350802577818 ↗
12. 12) ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). E 99198 Practice for color measurement of fluorescent specimens. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1998.
13. 10.1080/0001635080220841410.1080/00016350802208414 ↗
14. 14) Lee YK, Yu B. Measurement of opalescence of tooth enamel. J Dent 2007; 35: 690-694.10.1016/j.jdent.2007.05.010 ↗
15. 15) Powers JM, Dennison JB, Koran A. Color stability of restorative resins under accelerated aging. J Dent Res 1978; 57: 964-970.10.1177/00220345780570111101 ↗
16. 16) Duke ES, Trevino DF. A resin-modified glass ionomer restorative: three-year clinical results. J Indiana Dent Assoc 1998; 77: 13-16.
17. 17) Abu-Bakr N, Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. Color stability of compomer after immersion in various media. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 258-263.10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00232.x ↗
18. 18) Watanabe H, Covey D. Esthetic restorative material shade changes due to photopolymerization. Gen Dent 2008; 56: 260-266.
19. 19) Mohan M, Shey Z, Vaidyanathan J, Vaidyanathan TK, Munisamy S, Janal M. Color changes of restorative materials exposed in vitro to cola beverage. Pediatr Dent 2008; 30: 309-316.
20. 20) Lim HN, Yu B, Lim JI, Ahn JS, Lee YK. Influence of 2hydroxyethyl methacrylate content on the optical properties of experimental 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-added glass ionomer cement. Mater Design 2009; 30: 3996-4002.10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.027 ↗
21. 21) Kobashigawa AI, Angeletakis C. Opalescence fillers for dental restorative composite. US Patent 6232367, 2001.
22. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.01610.1016/j.dental.2008.01.016 ↗
23. 23) Lee YK, Lu H, Powers JM. Optical properties of four esthetic restorative materials after accelerated aging. Am J Dent 2006; 19: 155-158.
24. 24) Schulz H, Burtscher P, Mädler L. Correlating filler transparency with inorganic/polymer composite transparency. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufact 2007; 38: 2451-2459.10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.006 ↗
25. 25) Brendeke J, Ozcan M. Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 399-406.