Bonding performance of dispersed filler resin composite CAD/CAM blocks with different surface treatment protocols
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of various pretreatments on the bonding of a resin cement to resin-composite CAD/CAM blocks (RCBs) was examined. The surface of dispersed-filler RCBs (DF-RCBs) and a polymer infiltrated ceramic network RCB (PICN-RCB) was roughened using hydrofluoric acid etching (HF) or sandblasting, and followed by silanization and/or universal adhesive (UA) application. Microtensile bond strength (µTBS), surface roughness parameters (arithmetical mean height (Sa); developed interfacial area ratio (Sdr)), and critical surface energy (γc) were determined. For most DF-RCBs, the highest µTBS was obtained using HF+UA. UA application to DF-RCBs resulted in similar or higher µTBS compared to silanization, which indicates that silane treatment is not crucial for DF-RCBs, especially after HF. In contrast, the highest µTBS to PICN-RCB was obtained with silanization. Both roughening pretreatments significantly increased the surface roughness parameters and the γc of all RCBs. The γc was positively correlated with Sa (r=0.756, p<0.001) and Sdr (r=0.837, p<0.001).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Modern University for Technology and Information
Department of Operative Dentistry, Division of Oral Functional Science and Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Asahi University
Al-Mikwah Dental Center, Saudi Ministry of Health
Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine of the Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Eldafrawy M, Nguyen JF, Mainjot AK, Sadoun MJ. A functionally graded PICN material for biomimetic CAD-CAM blocks. J Dent Res 2018; 97: 1324-1330.10.1177/0022034518785364 ↗
2. 2) Nguyen JF, Ruse D, Phan AC, Sadoun MJ. High-temperature-pressure polymerized resin-infiltrated ceramic networks. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 62-67.10.1177/0022034513511972 ↗
3. 3) Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y, Oki M, et al. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 705-710.10.4012/dmj.2014-208 ↗
4. 4) Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, Dewael TY, Sadoun MJ. From artisanal to CAD-CAM blocks. J Dent Res 2016; 95: 487-495.10.1177/0022034516634286 ↗
5. 5) Harris JJ, Marquis PM. Comparison of the deformation and failure characteristics of morphologically distinct metal-glass interpenetrating phase composites. J Mater Sci 2002; 37: 2801-2810.10.1023/A:1015841721720 ↗
6. 6) Swain M V, Coldea A, Bilkhair A, Guess PC. Interpenetrating network ceramic-resin composite dental restorative materials. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 34-42.10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.009 ↗
7. 7) Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Properties of experimental urethane dimethacrylate-based dental resin composite blocks obtained via thermo-polymerization under high pressure. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 535-541.10.1016/j.dental.2013.02.006 ↗
8. 8) Sadoun M. ( 12 ) United States Patent (US 8,507,578 B2), 2013.
9. 9) Nguyen J-F, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 529-534.10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.003 ↗
10. 10) Phan AC, Tang ML, Nguyen JF, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. High-temperature high-pressure polymerized urethane dimethacrylate - Mechanical properties and monomer release. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 350-356.10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.009 ↗
11. 11) Eldafrawy M, Greimers L, Bekaert S, Gailly P, Lenaerts C, Nguyen J-F, et al. Silane influence on bonding to CAD-CAM composites: An interfacial fracture toughness study. Dent Mater 2019; 35: 1279-1290.10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.019 ↗
12. 12) Bona A Della, Shen C, Anusavice KJ. Work of adhesion of resin on treated lithia disilicate-based ceramic. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 338-344.10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00126-X ↗
13. 13) Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: A review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014; 26: 382-393.10.1111/jerd.12100 ↗
14. 14) Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composites to etchable ceramic surfaces —An insight review of the chemical aspects on surface conditioning. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 622-630.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01569.x ↗
15. 15) Phoenix RD, Shen C. Characterization of treated porcelain surfaces via dynamic contact angle analysis. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 187-194.
16. 16) Ali A, Takagaki T, Nikaido T, Abdou A, Tagami J. Influence of ambient air and different surface treatments on the bonding performance of a CAD/CAM composite block. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20: 317-324.
17. 17) Ali A, Takagaki T, Naruse Y, Abdou A, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, et al. The effect of elapsed time following alumina blasting on adhesion of CAD/CAM resin block to dentin. Dent Mater J 2019; 38: 354-360.10.4012/dmj.2018-113 ↗
18. 18) Naruse Y, Takagaki T, Matsui N, Sato T, Ali A, Ikeda M, et al. Effect of alumina-blasting pressure on adhesion of CAD/CAM resin block to dentin. Dent Mater J 2018; 37: 805-811.10.4012/dmj.2017-237 ↗
19. 19) Mesmar S, Ruse ND. Interfacial fracture toughness of adhesive resin cement-lithium-disilicate/resin-composite blocks. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: e243-251.10.1111/jopr.12672 ↗
20. 20) Higashi M, Matsumoto M, Kawaguchi A, Miura J, Minamino T, Kabetani T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive and conventional-type adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM resin blocks. Part 1: Effects of sandblasting and silanization. Dent Mater J 2016; 35: 21-28.10.4012/dmj.2015-234 ↗
21. 21) Arpa C, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Perdigão J. Repair bond strength and nanoleakage of artificially aged CAD-CAM composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 121: 523-530.10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.013 ↗
22. 22) Mine A, Kabetani T, Kawaguchi-Uemura A, Higashi M, Tajiri Y, Hagino R, et al. Effectiveness of current adhesive systems when bonding to CAD/CAM indirect resin materials: A review of 32 publications. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2019; 55: 41-50.10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.10.001 ↗
23. 23) Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Irie M, Yoshida Y, et al. Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks. Dent Mater 2017; 33: e124-135.10.1016/j.dental.2016.12.003 ↗
24. 24) Ilie N, Ruse ND. Shear bond strength vs interfacial fracture toughness —Adherence to CAD/CAM blocks. Dent Mater 2019; 35: 1769-1775.10.1016/j.dental.2019.10.003 ↗
25. 25) Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Irie M, Sonoda A, Makita Y, Yoshida Y, et al. Effectiveness of silane coupling agent incorporated in universal adhesive. Dent Mater 2015; 31: e44.10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.097 ↗
26. 26) Emsermann I, Eggmann F, Krastl G, Weiger R, Amato J. Influence of pretreatment methods on the adhesion of composite and polymer infiltrated ceramic CAD-CAM blocks. J Adhes Dent 2019; 21: 433-443.
27. 27) Veríssimo AH, Duarte Moura DM, de Oliveira Dal Piva AM, Bottino MA, de Fátima Dantas de Almeida L, da Fonte Porto Carreiro A, et al. Effect of different repair methods on the bond strength of resin composite to CAD/CAM materials and microorganisms adhesion: An in situ study. J Dent 2020; 93: 103266.10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103266 ↗
28. 28) El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 575-583.10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00107-0 ↗
29. 29) Özcan M, Volpato C M. Surface conditioning and bonding protocol for polymer-infiltrated ceramic: How and why? J Adhes Dent 2016; 18: 174-175.
30. 30) Yu H, Özcan M, Yoshida K, Cheng H, Sawase T. Bonding to industrial indirect composite blocks: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2019; 36: 119-134.10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.002 ↗
31. 31) Eldafrawy M, Ebroin MG, Gailly PA, Nguyen J-F, Sadoun MJ, Mainjot AK. Bonding to CAD-CAM composites: An interfacial fracture toughness approach. J Dent Res 2018; 97: 60-67.10.1177/0022034517728714 ↗
32. 32) Elsaka SE. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: The effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent 2014; 16: 531-540.
33. 33) Loomans BAC, Cardoso MV, Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, De Munck J, Huysmans MCDNJM, et al. Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair. J Dent 2011; 39: 499-505.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.007 ↗
34. 34) Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Valjakova EB, Mishevska CB. Bonding effectiveness of luting composites to different CAD/CAM materials. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18: 289-302.
35. 35) Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Egilmez F, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthodont Res 2016; 60: 265-273.10.1016/j.jpor.2016.02.003 ↗
36. 36) Deltombe R, Kubiak KJ, Bigerelle M. How to select the most relevant 3D roughness parameters of a surface. Scanning 2014; 36: 150-160.10.1002/sca.21113 ↗
37. 37) Combe E. A protocol for determining the surface free energy of dental materials. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 262-268.10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00102-7 ↗
38. 38) Zisman WA. Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. Contact Angle, Wettability, Adhes., vol. 43, American Chemical Society; 1964, p. 1-51.10.1021/ba-1964-0043.ch001 ↗
39. 39) Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 212-221.10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00034-7 ↗
40. 40) Belli R, Wendler M, de Ligny D, Cicconi MR, Petschelt A, Peterlik H, et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 1: Measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 84-98.10.1016/j.dental.2016.10.009 ↗
41. 41) Awad MM, Albedaiwi L, Almahdy A, Khan R, Silikas N, Hatamleh MM, et al. Effect of universal adhesives on microtensile bond strength to hybrid ceramic. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19: 1-7.10.1186/s12903-019-0865-7 ↗
42. 42) Matinlinna JP, Lung CYK, Tsoi JKH. Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: A review. Dent Mater 2018; 34: 13-28.10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.002 ↗
43. 43) Matisons JG. Silanes and Siloxanes as Coupling Agents to Glass: A Perspective. Adv Silicon Sci vol. 4, 2012, p. 281-298.10.1007/978-94-007-3876-8_10 ↗
44. 44) Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Sonoda A, Maruo Y, Makita Y, Okihara T, et al. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in ‘universal’ adhesives. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 1218-1225.10.1016/j.dental.2016.07.002 ↗
45. 45) Nishiyama N, Horie K, Asakura T. Hydrolysis and condensation mechanisms of a silane coupling agent studied by 13C and 29Si NMR. J Appl Polym Sci 1987; 34: 1619-1630.10.1002/app.1987.070340421 ↗
46. 46) Schwenter J, Schmidli F, Weiger R, Fischer J. Adhesive bonding to polymer infiltrated ceramic. Dent Mater J 2016; 35: 796-802.10.4012/dmj.2015-271 ↗
47. 47) Chuang SF, Kang LL, Liu YC, Lin JC, Wang CC, Chen HM, et al. Effects of silane- and MDP-based primers application orders on zirconia–resin adhesion —A ToF-SIMS study. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 923-933.10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.027 ↗
48. 48) Rohr N, Fischer J, Flury A. Efficacy of a universal adhesive in the bond strength of composite cements to polymer-infiltrated ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19: 417-424.
49. 49) Gilbert S, Keul C, Roos M, Edelhoff D, Stawarczyk B. Bonding between CAD/CAM resin and resin composite cements dependent on bonding agents: three different in vitro test methods. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20: 227-236.10.1007/s00784-015-1494-4 ↗
50. 50) Yu H, Yoshida K, Cheng H, Sawase T. Bonding of different self-adhesive resins to high-strength composite resin block treated with surface conditioning. J Prosthodont Res 2019; 63: 340-346.10.1016/j.jpor.2019.01.008 ↗
51. 51) Keul C, Müller-Hahl M, Eichberger M, Liebermann A, Roos M, Edelhoff D, et al. Impact of different adhesives on work of adhesion between CAD/CAM polymers and resin composite cements. J Dent 2014; 42: 1105-1114.10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.020 ↗