Fracture strength of CAD/CAM fabricated lithium disilicate and resin nano ceramic restorations used for endodontically treated teeth
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the fracture strength and failure modes of endocrowns, zirconia post, and fiber post supported restorations and predict the clinical outcomes of six different prostheses used for endodontically treated teeth. Sixty (n=10) maxillary central incisors were restored with zirconia post/resin-nano-ceramic crown (ZrRNC), fiber post/resinnano-ceramic crown (FbRNC), zirconia post/lithium disilicate ceramic crown (ZrLDS), fiber post/lithium disilicate ceramic crown (FbLDS), resin-nano-ceramic endocrown (EndoRNC), and lithium disilicate ceramic endocrown (EndoLDS). Fracture strength test was performed. Fracture loads and modes were determined. The EndoLDS group had the highest fracture strength, followed by ZrRNC and EndoRNC group. However the results were not significantly different among groups (p>0.05). The failure modes of the restorations changed according to the restorative materials. Endodontically treated anterior teeth might be restored with endocrowns as well as other post-core restorations, however tooth fracture failures should be considered that affect reliability of endocrowns.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Özkurt Z, Iseri U, Kazazoglu E. Zirconia ceramic post systems: a literature review and a case report. Dent Mater J 2010; 29: 233-245.10.4012/dmj.2009-128 ↗
2. 2) Toksavul S, Toman M, Uyulgan B, Schmage P, Nergiz I. Effect of luting agents and reconstruction techniques on the fracture resistance of pre-fabricated post systems. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 433-440.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01438.x ↗
3. 3) Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 2001; 10: 26-36.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00026.x ↗
4. 4) Akkayan B. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced and zirconia dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 155-162.10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.04.027 ↗
5. 5) Stricker EJ, Gohring TN. Influence of different posts and cores on marginal adaptation, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of composite resin crowns on human mandibular premolars. An in vitro study. J Dent 2006; 34: 326-335.10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.007 ↗
6. 6) Beck N, Graef F, Wichmann M, Karl M. In vitro fracture resistance of copy-milled zirconia ceramic posts. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 103: 40-44.10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60214-6 ↗
7. 7) Ramirez-Sebastia A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, Roig M, Krejci I. Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 545-554.10.1007/s00784-013-0978-3 ↗
8. 8) Totiam P, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Fontana MR, Zero DT. A new in vitro model to study the relationship of gap size and secondary caries. Caries Res 2007; 41: 467-473.10.1159/000107934 ↗
9. 9) Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2667-2682.10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00407-0 ↗
10. 10) Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical behavior of translucent fiber posts: a 2-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 593-596.
11. 11) Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Vichi A, Mason PN, Radovic I, Tay F. Long term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2007; 20: 287-291.
12. 12) Drummond JL, Toepke TR, King TJ. Thermal and cyclic loading of endodontic posts. Eur J Oral Sci 1999; 107: 220-224.10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos1070310.x ↗
13. 13) Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. J Dent 2001; 29: 427-433.10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00038-0 ↗
14. 14) Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo crowns after 2 years-preliminary results. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 255-265.
15. 15) Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 130-136.10.2341/11-105-L ↗
16. 16) Forberger N, Gohring TN. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100: 264-273.10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60205-X ↗
17. 17) Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int 2008; 39: 117-129.
18. 18) Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. Fiber-reinforced resin coating for endocrown preparations: a technical report. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 242-248.10.2341/12-139-TR ↗
19. 19) Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013; 25: 383-390.10.1111/jerd.12065 ↗
20. 20) Magne P, Carvalho A, Bruzi G, Anderson RE, Maia HP, Giannini M. Influence of no-ferrule and no-post buildup design on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM crowns. Oper Dent 2014; 39: 595-602.10.2341/13-004-L ↗
21. 21) Lander E, Dietschi D. Endocrowns: a clinical report. Quintessence Int 2008; 39: 99-106.
22. 22) Gohring TN, Peters OA. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth without posts. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 313-317.
23. 23) Ramirez-Sebastia A, Bortolotto T, Roig M, Krejci I. Composite vs ceramic computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacturing crowns in endodontically treated teeth: analysis of marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 663-673.10.2341/12-208-L ↗
24. 24) Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995; 7: 83-94.
25. 25) El-Damanhoury H, Haj-Ali R, Platt J. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Oper Dent 2014; 40: 201-210.10.2341/13-143-L ↗
26. 26) Chen C, Trindade FZ, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM resin nano ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 954-962.10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.018 ↗
27. 27) Magne P, Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 149-157.10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60111-4 ↗
28. 28) Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Zellweger G, Buchler A, Zappini G.Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1352-1361.10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.019 ↗
29. 29) Dikbas I, Tanalp J, Koksal T, Yalniz A, Gungor T. Investigation of the effect of different prefabricated intracanal posts on fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth. Dent Traumatol 2010; 30: 49-54.10.1111/edt.12034 ↗
30. 30) Goracci C, Grandini S, Bossù M, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts: a review. J Dent 2007; 35: 827-835.10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.009 ↗
31. 31) Gu XH, Mao CY, Liang C, Wang HM, Kern M. Does endodontic post space irrigation affect smear layer removal and bonding effectiveness? Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 597-603.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00661.x ↗
32. 32) Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 90-101.10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.009 ↗
33. 33) Saraiva LO, Aguiar TR, Costa L, Correr-Sobrinho L, Muniz L, Mathias P. Effect of different adhesion strategies on fiber post cementation: Push-out test and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Contemp Clin Dent 2013; 4: 443-447.10.4103/0976-237X.123022 ↗
34. 34) Faria-e-Silva AL, Mendonça AA, Garcez RM, Oliveira Ada S, Moreira AG, Moraes RR. Adhesion strategy and early bond strengths of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26: 485-487.10.1590/S1806-83242012005000017 ↗
35. 35) Scotti N, Rota R, Scansetti M, Migliaretti G, Pasqualini D, Berutti E. Fiber post adhesion to radicular dentin: The use of acid etching prior to a one-step self-etching adhesive. Quintessence Int 2012; 43: 615-623.
36. 36) Vichi A, Vano M, Ferrari M. The effect of different storage conditions and duration on the fracture strength of three types of translucent fiber posts. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 832-838.10.1016/j.dental.2007.09.011 ↗
37. 37) Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjör IA. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 255-260.
38. 38) Amaral M, Santini MF, Wandscher V, Amaral R, Valandro LF. An in vitro comparison of different cementation strategies on the pull-out strength of a glass fiber post. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 443-451.10.2341/08-113 ↗
39. 39) Perdigão J, Van Meerbeek B, Lopes MM, Ambrose WW. The effect of a re-wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 282-295.10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00049-4 ↗
40. 40) Lin CL, Chang YH, Chang CY, Pai CA, Huang SF. Finite element and Weibull analyses to estimate failure risks in the ceramic endocrown and classical crown for endodontically treated maxillary premolar. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118: 87-93.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00704.x ↗
41. 41) Bindl A, Richter B, Mormann WH. Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 219-224.
42. 42) Aversa R, Apicella D, Perillo L, Sorrentino R, Zarone F, Ferrari M, Apicella A. Non-linear elastic three-dimensional finite element analysis on the effect of endocrown material rigidity on alveolar bone remodeling process. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 678-690.10.1016/j.dental.2008.10.015 ↗