Effect of pre-coating with methyl methacrylate containing UV photoinitiators on the bond strength of poly(ether ether ketone)
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of pre-coating with methyl methacrylate (MMA) containing ultraviolet (UV) photoinitiators on the bond strength of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK). Cylindrical PEEK blocks were irradiated with 365 nm UV light for 5-20 s after they were coated with MMA containing 0.4-3.0 wt% UV photoinitiators: [1-phenyl-1,2-propanedione (PPD)], [diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) (TMDPO)], and [phenyl bis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (BTMPO)]. Pre-coated PEEKs were bonded to PEEK blocks with a MMA-based adhesive resin. The shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. Secondary electron images were captured to observe failure surfaces. The data were analyzed with one- and two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests (p<0.05). The highest bond strength (20.7±5.1 MPa) was observed for pre-coating with MMA containing 0.4 wt% BTMPO, for 20 s of UV irradiation. Cohesive failure of the adhesive resin was observed. The use of this pre-coating led to improved bonding performance of PEEK.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Biomimetics, Faculty of Dentistry & Graduate School of Medical and Dental sciences, Niigata University
Division of Bio-Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry & Graduate School of Medical and Dental sciences, Niigata University
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 4845-4869.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 ↗
2. 2) Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res 2016; 60: 12-19.10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001 ↗
3. 3) Fujihara K, Huang ZM, Ramakrishna S, Satknanantham K, Hamada H. Feasibility of knitted carbon/PEEK composites for orthopedic bone plates. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 3877-3885.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.050 ↗
4. 4) Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Uhrenbacher J, Wimmer T, Edelhoff D, Schmidlin PR. Three-unit reinforced Polyetheretherketone composite FDPs: Influence of fabrication method on load-bearing capacity and failure types. Dent Mater J 2015; 34: 7-12.10.4012/dmj.2013-345 ↗
5. 5) Liebermann A, Wimmer T, Schmidlin PR, Schere H, Loffler P, Roos M, et al. Physicomechanical characterization of Polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 321-328.10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.004 ↗
6. 6) Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hammerle CHF, Fischer J. Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 553-559.10.1016/j.dental.2010.02.003 ↗
7. 7) Zhou L, Qian Y, Zhu Y, Liu H, Gan K, Guo J. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of PEEK composite materials. Dent Mater 2014; 30: e209-e215.10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.011 ↗
8. 8) Tsuka H, Morita K, Kato K, Kawano H, Abekura H, Tsuga K. Evaluation of shear bond strength between PEEK and resin-based luting material. J Oral Biosci 2017; 59: 231-236.10.1016/j.job.2017.09.003 ↗
9. 9) Hallmann L, Mehl A, Sereno N, Hammerle CHF. The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through different pre-treatments. Appl Surf Sci 2012; 258: 7213-7218.10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.04.040 ↗
10. 10) Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, et al. Polyetheretherketone- A suitable material for fixed denture prostheses?. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2013; 101: 1209-1216.10.1002/jbm.b.32932 ↗
11. 11) Kern M, Lehman F. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to Polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Dent Mater 2012; 28: 1280-1283.10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.010 ↗
12. 12) Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Eichberger M, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Work of adhesion between resin composite cements and PEEK as a function of etching duration with sulfuric acid and its correlation with bond strength values. Int J Adhes Adhes 2014; 54: 184-190.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.06.006 ↗
13. 13) Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W, et al. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1278-1288.10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.014 ↗
14. 14) Zhang S, Awaja F, James N, Mckenzie DR, Ruys AJ. Autohesion of plasma treated semi-crystalline PEEK: Comparative study of argon, nitrogen and oxygen treatments. Colloids Surf A 2011; 374: 88-95.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.11.013 ↗
15. 15) Iqbal HMS, Bhowmik S, Benedictus R. Surface modification of high performance polymers by atmospheric pressure plasma and failure mechanism of adhesive bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 2010; 30: 418-424.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.02.007 ↗
16. 16) Jha S, Bhowmik S, Bhatnagar N, Bhattacharya NK, Deka U, Iqbal HMS, et al. Experimental investigation into the effect of adhesion properties of PEEK modified by atmospheric pressure plasma and low pressure plasma. J Appl Polym Sci 2010; 118: 173-179.10.1002/app.31880 ↗
17. 17) Stawarezyk S, Bahr N, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Gernet W, et al. Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Invest 2014; 18: 163-170.10.1007/s00784-013-0966-7 ↗
18. 18) Comyn J, Mascia L, Xiao G, Parker BM. Plasma-treatment of polyetherertherketone (PEEK) for adhesive bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes 1996; 16: 94-104.
19. 19) Shi H, Sinke J, Benedictus R. Surface modification of PEEK by UV irradiation for direct co-curing with carbon fiber reinforced epoxy prepregs. Int J Adhes Adhes 2017; 73: 51-57.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.07.017 ↗
20. 20) Mathieson I, Bradley RH. Improved adhesion to polymers by UV/ozone surface oxidation. Int J Adhes Adhes 1996; 16: 29-31.10.1016/0143-7496(96)88482-X ↗
21. 21) Niu YF, Yang Y, Li TY, Yao JW. Effects of UV irradiation and condensation on poly(ether-ether –ketone)/carbon fiber composites from nano-to macro-scale. High Perform Polym 2018; 30: 230-238.10.1177/0954008316689600 ↗
22. 22) Smith BGN, Wright PS, Brown D. The clinical handling of dental materials, 2th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd; 1994. p. 208.
23. 23) Ikemura K, Ichizawa K, Yoshida M, Ito S, Endo T. UV-VIS spectra and photoinitiation behaviors of acylphosphine oxide and bisacylphosphine oxide derivatives in unfilled, light-cured dental resins. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 765-774.10.4012/dmj.27.765 ↗
24. 24) Duan G, Zhang C, Li A, Yang X, Lu L, Wang X. Preparation and characterization of mesoporous zirconia made by using a poly (methyl methacrylate) template. Nanoscale Res Lett 2008; 3: 118-122.10.1007/s11671-008-9123-7 ↗
25. 25) Huang RYM, Shao P, Burns CM, Feng X. Sulfonation of poly(ether ether ketone)(PEEK): kinetic study and characterization. J Appl Polym Sci 2001; 82: 2651-2660.10.1002/app.2118 ↗
26. 26) Bötel F, Zimmermann T, Sütel M, Müller WD, Schwitalla AD. Influence of different low-pressure plasma process parameters on shear bond strength between veneering composites and PEEK materials. Dent Mater 2018; 34: e246-e254.10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.004 ↗
27. 27) Ha SW, Hauert R, Ernst KH, Wintermantel E. Surface analysis of chemically-etched and plasma-treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for biomedical applications. Surf Coat Technol 1997; 96: 293-299.10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00179-5 ↗
28. 28) Yousaf A, Farrukh A, Oluz Z, Tuncel E, Duran H, Dogan SY, et al. UV-light assisted single step route to functional PEEK surfaces. React Funct Polym 2014; 83: 70-75.10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.07.011 ↗
29. 29) Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental materials: Properties and manipulation. 10th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2013. p. 164-165.
30. 30) Valeur B. Molecular Fluorescence: Principles and Applications. 1st ed. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, German; 2001. p 20-30.10.1002/3527600248 ↗
31. 31) Su WF. Principles of Polymer Design and Synthesis. SpringerLink, First Online; 09 October 2013. p 137-183.10.1007/978-3-642-38730-2_7 ↗
32. 32) Decker C, Zahouily K, Decker C, Nguyen T, Viet T. Performance analysis of acylphohphine oxides in photoinitiated polymerization. Polymer 2001; 42: 7551-7560.10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00221-X ↗
33. 33) Kyomoto M, Moro T, Yamane S, Hashimoto M, Takatori Y, Ishihara K. Poly(ether-ether-ketone) orthopedic bearing surface modified by self-initiated surface grafting of poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine). Biomaterials 2013; 34: 7829-7839.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.023 ↗
34. 34) Deng J, Wang L, Liu L, Yang W. Developments and new applications of UV-induced surface graft polymerizations. Prog Polym Sci 2009; 34: 156-193.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.06.002 ↗