Tensile and shear bond strengths of a stainless steel used in orthodontic brackets bonded to bovine enamel using two types of resin cement
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the bond strength of stainless steel with two types of resin cements (MMA- and composite-based) on bovine enamel depending on the directionality of the applied force. The specimens were either placed in water or subjected to thermal cycles (TC), and the shear or tensile bond strengths (SBS or TBS) were determined. The SBS showed significantly greater than the TBS for both types of cement, and the SBS and TBS for composite-based cement had larger than MMA-based one. No significant difference in SBS was observed in the cements even after being subjected to TC. Cohesive failures of the cement and bovine enamel in the composite-based group, while adhesive failures were observed in MMA-based one. Consequently, the direction of the force at both cements affected the retention of stainless steel, and MMA-based cement was preferred when prioritizing less enamel damages.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Orthodontic, Department of Developmental Oral Health Science, School of Dentistry, Iwate Medical University
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Iwate Medical University
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Retief DH, Dreyer CJ. Epoxy resins for bonding orthodontic attachments to teeth. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1967; 22: 338-346.
2. 2) Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: Progress report. Am J Orthod 1965; 51: 901-912.10.1016/0002-9416(65)90203-4 ↗
3. 3) Nojima LI, Araújo AS, Alves Júnior M. Indirect orthodontic bonding: A modified technique for improved efficiency and precision. Dent Press J Orthod 2015; 20: 109-117.10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.109-117.sar ↗
4. 4) Giannini M, Soares CJ, de Carvalho RM. Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structures. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 322-329.10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00110-6 ↗
5. 5) Dumbryte I, Jonavicius T, Linkeviciene L, Linkevicius T, Peciuliene V, Malinauskas M. Enamel cracks evaluation —A method to predict tooth surface damage during the debonding. Dent Mater J 2015; 34: 828-834.10.4012/dmj.2015-085 ↗
6. 6) Scribante A, Contreras-Bulnes R, Montasser MA, Vallittu PK. Orthodontics: Bracket materials, adhesives systems, and their bond strength. Biomed Res Int 2016; 2016: 1329814.10.1155/2016/1329814 ↗
7. 7) Habibi M, Nik TH, Hooshmand T. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: An in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 675-679.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.040 ↗
8. 8) Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From Buonocore’s pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratives. A status perspective of rapidly advancing dental adhesive technology. J Adhes Dent 2020; 22: 7-34.
9. 9) Sayinsu K, Isik F, Sezen S, Aydemir B. Effect of blood and saliva contamination on bond strength of brackets bonded with a protective liquid polish and a light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 391-394.10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.049 ↗
10. 10) Akhoundi MA, Kamel MR, Hashemi Sh M, Imani M. Tensile bond strength of metal bracket bonding to glazed ceramic surfaces with different surface conditionings. J Dent (Tehran) 2011; 8: 201-208.
11. 11) Mehmeti B, Azizi B, Kelmendi J, Iljazi-Shahiqi D, Alar Ž, Anić-Milošević S. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to zirconium crowns. Acta Stomatol Croat 2017; 51: 99-105.10.15644/asc51/2/2 ↗
12. 12) Wang WN, Li CH, Chou TH, Wang DD, Lin LH, Lin CT. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 65-70.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.01.003 ↗
13. 13) Shinya M, Shinya A, Lassila LV, Gomi H, Varrela J, Vallittu PK, et al. Treated enamel surface patterns associated with five orthodontic adhesive systems —Surface morphology and shear bond strength. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 1-6.10.4012/dmj.27.1 ↗
14. 14) Elsaka SE. Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material. Odontology 2016; 104: 68-76.10.1007/s10266-014-0188-8 ↗
15. 15) Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Effect of debonding force direction on orthodontic shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 261-265.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.048 ↗
16. 16) Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Belanger GK. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114: 514-519.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70171-4 ↗
17. 17) Hajizadeh M, Ghalichi F, Mirzakouchaki B. Optimization of orthodontic bracket base geometry for planar enamel surface teeth: A finite element study. Orthod Waves 2016; 75: 64-75.10.1016/j.odw.2016.08.002 ↗
18. 18) Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 1076-1081.10.1177/00220345830620101501 ↗
19. 19) Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL. Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 175-179.
20. 20) Reisner KR, Levitt HL, Mante F. Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: A comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 111: 366-373.10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80018-2 ↗
21. 21) Namura Y, Takamizawa T, Uchida Y, Inaba M, Noma D, Takemoto T, et al. Effects of composition on the hardness of orthodontic adhesives. J Oral Sci 2020; 62: 48-51.10.2334/josnusd.19-0035 ↗
22. 22) Flores T, Mayoral JR, Giner L, Puigdollers A. Comparison of enamel-bracket bond strength using direct- and indirect-bonding techniques with a self-etching ion releasing S-PRG filler. Dent Mater J 2015; 34: 41-47.10.4012/dmj.2014-138 ↗
23. 23) Goto S, Hasegawa Y, Miyagawa Y, Endo T. Effects of contact compressive force on bracket bond strength and adhesive thickness : Study using orthodontic resins with different viscosities. J Orofac Orthop 2020; 81: 79-88.10.1007/s00056-019-00202-9 ↗
24. 24) Costa AR, Correr AB, Consani S, Giorgi MC, Vedovello SA, Vedovello Filho M, et al. Influence of water storage and bonding material on bond strength of metallic brackets to ceramic. Braz Dent J 2015; 26: 503-506.10.1590/0103-6440201300403 ↗
25. 25) Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27: 89-99.10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2 ↗
26. 26) Jurubeba JEP, Costa AR, Correr-Sobrinho L, Tubel CAM, Correr AB, Vedovello SA, et al. Influence of thermal cycles number on bond strength of metallic brackets to ceramic. Braz Dent J 2017; 28: 206-209.10.1590/0103-6440201701217 ↗