Effects of sandblasting media and steam cleaning on bond strength of titanium-porcelain
Source abstract
Abstract
The effects of sandblasting media and steam cleaning treatment after sandblast were examined on tensile bond strength of porcelain to titanium. The use of the commercially available silica-coated alumina particles for sandblast was significantly effective for increasing bond strength than the conventional alumina. It might be due to the increased surface roughness and existence of remaining silica on titanium surface. Additional application of the steam cleaning on titanium surface after sandblasting could make the surface configuration clear in SEM by removing some sandblasted particles loosely embedded in titanium as well as the debris and oily contaminants. The resultant bond strength was significantly improved to reach almost the maximum strength of this porcelain-titanium system regardless of the kind of sandblasting media used, which was confirmed by the observation of the failure mode showing that most of the fracture surface was occupied by cohesive failure in porcelain.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Jung RE, Holderegger C, Sailer I, Khraisat A, Suter A, Hammerle CH. The effect of all-ceramic and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations on marginal peri-implant soft tissue color: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28: 357-365.
2. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.00510.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.005 ↗
3. 3) Ida K, Tsutsumi S, Togaya T. Titanium or titanium alloys for dental casting. In: Proceedings of 58th IADR; 1980 [Abstract no. 397].
4. 4) Menis DL, Moser JB, Greener EH. Experimental porcelain compositions for application to cast titanium. In: Proceedings of 64th IADR; 1986 [Abstract no. 1565].
5. KIMURA H · 1990 · 30 · 43
6. 6) Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 635-641.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01543.x-i2 ↗
7. 7) Phillips RW. Skinner’s science of dental materials. 9th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1991. p. 597.
8. 8) Togaya T, Suzuki M, Tsutsumi S, Ida K. An application of pure titanium to the metal porcelain system. Dent Mater J 1983; 2: 210-219.10.4012/dmj.2.210 ↗
9. 9) Kupper H. Pure titanium as an alternative material in restorative dentistry. QDT Yearbook 1992; 7: 143-152.
10. 10) Kimura H, Horng CJ, Okazaki M, Takahashi J. Oxidation effects on porcelain enamels. J Prosthet Dent 1967; 18: 155-159.
11. 11) Kimura H, Horng CJ, Okazaki M, Takahashi J. Oxidation effects on porcelain-titanium interface reactions and bond strength. Dent Mater J 1990; 9: 91-99.10.4012/dmj.9.91 ↗
12. 12) Taira M, Moser JB, Greener EH. Studies of Ti alloys for dental castings. Dent Mater J 1989: 5: 45-50.10.1016/0109-5641(89)90093-6 ↗
13. 13) Oshida Y, Hashem A. Titanium-porcelain system. Part I: Oxidation kinetics of nitrided pure titanium, simulated to porcelain firing process. Bio Med Mater Eng 1993; 3: 185-198.10.3233/BME-1993-3402 ↗
14. 10.1016/0109-5641(95)80040-910.1016/0109-5641(95)80040-9 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1959.tb13567.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1959.tb13567.x ↗
16. 16) Derand T, Hero H. Bond strength of porcelain on cast vs. wrought titanium. Scand J Dent Res 1992; 100: 184-188.
17. 17) Lautenschlager EP, Monagham P. Titanium and titanium alloys as dental materals. Int Dent J 1993; 42: 245-253.
18. 10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00045-110.1016/S0300-5712(98)00045-1 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70035-110.1016/S0022-3913(99)70035-1 ↗
20. 20) Lim BS, Heo SM, Lee YK, Kim CW. Shear bond strength between titanium alloys and composite resin: sandblasting versus fluoride-gel treatment. J Biomed Mater Res B 2003; 64: 38-43.10.1002/jbm.b.10484 ↗
21. 21) Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc; 2001. p. 613.
22. 22) Jochen DG, Caputo AA, Matyas J. Effect of metal surface treatment on ceramic bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 186-188.10.1016/0022-3913(86)90339-2 ↗
23. 23) Graham JD, Johnson A, Wildgoose DG, Shareef MY, Cannavina G. The effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of a nonprecious alloy-ceramic interface. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 330-334.
24. 24) Ohara S. Surface treatment of titanium for porcelain fusing. Kyushu Dent Soc 1996; 50: 71-88.10.2504/kds.50.71 ↗
25. 25) NIH.gov [Internet]. Maryland: National Institutes of Health; c2010-04. Available from: http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/download. html.
26. 26) Yanae H. Four steps excel statistics. 1th ed, OMS Ltd, Saitama, 1998.
27. 27) Lacy AM. The chemical nature of dental porcelain. Dent Clin North Am 1977; 21: 661-667.10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00983-1 ↗
28. 10.1016/0109-5641(93)90112-410.1016/0109-5641(93)90112-4 ↗
29. 29) Lavine MH, Custer R. Variables affecting the strength of bond between porcelain and gold. J Dent Res 1966; 45: 3-35.
30. 30) Wen ZH, Du CS, Zhen DC. The effect of different size of aluminoxide for sandblasting on bonding strength of porcelain to metal. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 1994; 29: 229-231.
31. 31) Papadopoulos T, Tsetsekou A, Eliades G. Effect of aluminum oxide sandblasting on cast commercially pure titanium surfaces. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1999; 7: 15-21.
32. 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90017-510.1016/0109-5641(94)90017-5 ↗
33. 10.1016/0300-5712(94)90067-110.1016/0300-5712(94)90067-1 ↗
34. 34) May KB, Fox J, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Silane to enhance the bond between polymethyl methacrylate and titanium. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 428-431.10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80070-8 ↗
35. 35) Vallittu PK, Kurunmaki H. Bond strength of fibre-reinforced composite to the metal surface. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 887-892.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01076.x ↗
36. 10.2341/05-2210.2341/05-22 ↗
37. 37) Magni E, Mazzitelli C, Papacchini F, Radovic I, Goracci C, Coniglio I, Ferrari M. Adhesion between fiber posts and resin luting agents: a microtensile bond strength test and an SEM investigation following different treatments of the post surface. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 195-202.
38. 10.4012/dmj.27.15910.4012/dmj.27.159 ↗