Intramolecular Down‐ and Up‐Conversion in Dimeric Tetracene Complexes Centered via Platinum(II) and Palladium(II)
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Two dimeric tetracene complexes, Pt(L tc ) 2 Cl 2 and Pd(L tc ) 2 Cl 2 , have been synthesized by coordination of a pyridyl substituted acene‐ to a Pt(II) and Pd(II) metal center. The photophysical properties of the two dimers are characterized and compared with the free tetracene ligand L tc , as well as the corresponding monomeric complexes ( Pt(L tc )( L ref )Cl 2 and Pd(L tc )(L ref )Cl 2 ) to shed light on the processes of intramolecular up‐ and down‐conversion, namely triplet‐triplet annihilation and singlet fission, respectively. Both the free ligand L tc and Pt(L tc )(L ref )Cl 2 show high fluorescence quantum yields, while emission is heavily reduced in the Pt(L tc ) 2 Cl 2 and Pd(II) complexes. Dimer Pt(L tc ) 2 Cl 2 exhibits efficient singlet fission within 1.6 ns to form a correlated triplet pair (T 1 T 1 ), confirming that coupling is mediated through Pt(II) over remarkably long inter‐chromophore distances. Subsequently, (T 1 T 1 ) dissociates into free triplets (T 1 + T 1 ) with yields of ca. 50%. Moreover, due to the isoenergetic level of the singlet excited state and (T 1 T 1 ) for tetracene dimers, some (T 1 T 1 ) in Pt(L tc ) 2 Cl 2 is observed to undergo intramolecular up‐conversion and return to the singlet excited state, followed by upconverted fluorescence. On the other hand, photoexcitation of Pd(L tc ) 2 Cl 2 gives a kinetic behavior that is similar to the monomer Pd(L tc )(L ref )Cl 2 , namely no singlet fission but fast intersystem crossing within hundreds of picoseconds. It is noted that triplet formation in the Pd(II) monomer and dimer complexes is low, and that non‐radiative decay of the singlet excitons to the ground state dominates in both cases. The singlet excited state of all metal–organic complexes exhibits subtle intrachromophore charge‐transfer characteristics in polar solvents and kinetic schemes that are similar to that observed in apolar solvents.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes · Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy Interdisciplinary Center for Molecular Materials (ICMM) Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Egerlandstr. 3 91058 Erlangen Germany
Department of Chemistry University of Alberta 11227 Saskatchewan Drive Edmonton AB T6G 2G2 Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr100261310.1021/cr1002613 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0057210.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00572 ↗
3. 10.1039/D0EE00495B10.1039/D0EE00495B ↗
4. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-042018-05243510.1146/annurev-physchem-042018-052435 ↗
5. 10.1002/marc.20227006610.1002/marc.202270066 ↗
6. Zhang Y. · J. Semicond. · 2022 · 43 · 1
7. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-11013010.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110130 ↗
8. 10.1063/5.008025010.1063/5.0080250 ↗
9. 10.1039/C5SC03215F10.1039/C5SC03215F ↗
10. 10.1063/1.150567710.1063/1.1505677 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0071610.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00716 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.513530710.1063/1.5135307 ↗
13. 10.1002/chem.20170535510.1002/chem.201705355 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20240110310.1002/anie.202401103 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.3c0241710.1021/jacs.3c02417 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20231506410.1002/anie.202315064 ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20200853310.1002/anie.202008533 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.3c0607510.1021/jacs.3c06075 ↗
19. 10.1039/D1SC06285A10.1039/D1SC06285A ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b0373910.1021/acs.orglett.6b03739 ↗
21. 10.1021/ja073173y10.1021/ja073173y ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.8b0440110.1021/jacs.8b04401 ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.5b1055010.1021/jacs.5b10550 ↗
24. 10.1021/jacs.8b0483010.1021/jacs.8b04830 ↗
25. 10.1039/C9SC00384C10.1039/C9SC00384C ↗
26. 10.1038/nchem.258910.1038/nchem.2589 ↗
27. 10.1038/ncomms1517110.1038/ncomms15171 ↗
28. 10.1002/anie.20190722110.1002/anie.201907221 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0450310.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04503 ↗
30. 10.1039/C9SC04410H10.1039/C9SC04410H ↗
31. 10.1002/cptc.20200001610.1002/cptc.202000016 ↗
32. 10.1021/prechem.3c0008210.1021/prechem.3c00082 ↗
33. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c0104410.1021/acscentsci.0c01044 ↗
34. 10.1142/S108842462350064510.1142/S1088424623500645 ↗
35. 10.1021/cr300282410.1021/cr3002824 ↗
36. 10.1021/cr200077m10.1021/cr200077m ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.accounts.4c0003110.1021/acs.accounts.4c00031 ↗
38. 10.1021/jacs.9b1269310.1021/jacs.9b12693 ↗
39. 10.1021/jacs.0c1285310.1021/jacs.0c12853 ↗
40. 10.1002/cplu.20170016810.1002/cplu.201700168 ↗
41. Pd(II) complexes contain minor contamination in the form of free ligand that is undetectable by1H NMR spectroscopy. The high fluorescence quantum yields of Ltc as opposed to the low fluorescence quantum yields of Pd(II) complexes allows for the detection of the free ligand in the emission spectra of Pd(Ltc)2Cl2and Pd(Ltc)(Lref)Cl2(Figure S11).
42. 10.1038/nprot.2018.01310.1038/nprot.2018.013 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.0c2020310.1021/acsami.0c20203 ↗
44. 10.1021/acssensors.8b0008310.1021/acssensors.8b00083 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.07.01710.1016/j.ccr.2018.07.017 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0196410.1021/acsenergylett.8b01964 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0473410.1021/acs.jpcc.1c04734 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b0436710.1021/acs.jpca.6b04367 ↗
49. 10.1073/pnas.142243611210.1073/pnas.1422436112 ↗
50. 10.1039/C4RA16584E10.1039/C4RA16584E ↗
51. 10.1021/jacs.2c0977510.1021/jacs.2c09775 ↗
52. The coordination of Ltcby Pd(II) and Ltc is unstable in benzonitrile likely due to the competitive coordination of the solvent (Figure S23). This suggests that the coordination between Pt(II) and Ltcis stronger see ref. [36].
53. 10.1021/jacs.9b0556110.1021/jacs.9b05561 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41557-021-00665-710.1038/s41557-021-00665-7 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.04.00610.1016/j.chempr.2018.04.006 ↗