journal article·2026-06Open access

3D‐Printed Sulfur‐Derived Polymers With Controlled Architectures for Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries

Bin Ling, Haoran Wang, Pan Yang, Rishav Agrawal, Alex R. Neale, Laurence J. Hardwick, Tom Hasell, Esther García‐Tuñón

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 36· Issue 44

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lithium‐sulfur batteries are emerging as a promising next‐generation energy storage system because of their high theoretical energy density, cost‐effectiveness, and sustainability. However, conventional electrode fabrication techniques face limitations in tailoring electrode structures, active material loading, and addressing the polysulfide shuttle effect, which significantly hampers the electrochemical performance and cycle life. This study presents a versatile approach exploiting direct ink writing (DIW) to fabricate multi‐scale porous sulfur‐rich copolymer cathodes. The sulfur‐dicyclopentadiene (SD) copolymer with a sulfur content of 62.1 wt. synthesized via inverse vulcanization, ensures complete copolymerization and eliminates crystalline sulfur. Aqueous ink formulations incorporating SD, graphene oxide (GO), and Pluronic F127 provide a good balance between printability and electrochemical performance. Rheological properties from large amplitude oscillatory shear experiments flag distinctive flow transitions that compromise printability when using GO as formulation additive. The DIW‐fabricated grid‐like architectures mitigate the shuttle effect through tunable macropores and micropores, and lead to effective ion and electron transport. Post‐thermal treatment further improves the copolymer matrix integration, achieving a specific capacity of 925 mAh g S −1 and a capacity retention of over 60% after 200 cycles. These design and printing strategies facilitate the fabrication of customized complex structures for high‐performance energy storage systems and can be applied to other functional materials and diverse applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Synthesis and properties of polymers · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Engineering and Materials Innovation Factory University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

Department of Chemistry University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

Stephenson Institute for Renewable Energy and Department of Chemistry University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

Funding

China Scholarship Council · Medical Research Foundation

References (92)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.02.00110.1016/j.ensm.2019.02.001 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat319110.1038/nmat3191 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13547710.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135477 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20210225910.1002/aenm.202102259 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0053610.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00536 ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.142388911210.1073/pnas.1423889112 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41560-023-01272-110.1038/s41560-023-01272-1 ↗
8. 10.1002/advs.20230399210.1002/advs.202303992 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.00110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.02.02210.1016/j.ensm.2019.02.022 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.14957610.1016/j.cej.2024.149576 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.03.02010.1016/j.ensm.2023.03.020 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0086610.1021/acsaem.2c00866 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0178010.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01780 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0799910.1021/acsnano.0c07999 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20200055610.1002/adma.202000556 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20140180410.1002/adma.201401804 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20210885510.1002/adma.202108855 ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20170012710.1002/aenm.201700127 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20200071510.1002/adfm.202000715 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20170713210.1002/adma.201707132 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15129210.1016/j.cej.2024.151292 ↗
23. 10.1002/smll.20230271810.1002/smll.202302718 ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20190946910.1002/adfm.201909469 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.180639410.1149/1.1806394 ↗
26. 10.1038/nchem.162410.1038/nchem.1624 ↗
27. 10.1002/aenm.20170152710.1002/aenm.201701527 ↗
28. 10.1039/D4SM00758A10.1039/D4SM00758A ↗
29. 10.1063/5.012865810.1063/5.0128658 ↗
30. 10.1002/chem.20190161910.1002/chem.201901619 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41467-019-08430-810.1038/s41467-019-08430-8 ↗
32. 10.1122/8.000061210.1122/8.0000612 ↗
33. 10.1063/5.015589610.1063/5.0155896 ↗
34. C.Saengow S.Sen J.Yus et al. “Stretching the Printability Metric in Direct‐Ink Writing with Highly Extensible Yield‐Stress Fluids ”arXiv(2025): arXiv:2501.12630.10.1002/adfm.202504474 ↗
35. 10.1039/D0TA04181E10.1039/D0TA04181E ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.03110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.031 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.05.01410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.05.014 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41578-022-00511-310.1038/s41578-022-00511-3 ↗
39. 10.1002/advs.20230371610.1002/advs.202303716 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.7b0771710.1021/acsami.7b07717 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.04910.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.049 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.08.03310.1016/j.msea.2018.08.033 ↗
43. 10.1002/aenm.20170028310.1002/aenm.201700283 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cartre.2023.10029310.1016/j.cartre.2023.100293 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.04.02310.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.04.023 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.02.08710.1016/j.jcis.2019.02.087 ↗
47. 10.1002/chem.20190097510.1002/chem.201900975 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.13142610.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.131426 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.08.00610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.08.006 ↗
50. 10.1039/C7RA00114B10.1039/C7RA00114B ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12882810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128828 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.02910.1016/j.envint.2019.03.029 ↗
53. 10.1186/s12302-023-00814-410.1186/s12302-023-00814-4 ↗
54. 10.1002/adfm.20240532010.1002/adfm.202405320 ↗
55. 10.1155/2018/283043710.1155/2018/2830437 ↗
56. Nordenström A. · 2023
57. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23192110.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231921 ↗
58. Wang H. · 2023
59. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.10118810.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101188 ↗
60. 10.1039/C8SM01936C10.1039/C8SM01936C ↗
61. 10.1039/D4SM01473A10.1039/D4SM01473A ↗
62. 10.1122/1.297009510.1122/1.2970095 ↗
63. 10.1122/1.354459110.1122/1.3544591 ↗
64. 10.1007/s00397-009-0403-710.1007/s00397-009-0403-7 ↗
65. 10.1016/S0377-0257(02)00141-610.1016/S0377-0257(02)00141-6 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.002 ↗
67. M. F.AshbyandD.Cebon “Materials Selection in Mechanical Design ”Le Journal de Physique IV3 no.C7(1993): C7–1.10.1051/jp4:1993701 ↗
68. 10.1063/5.002417710.1063/5.0024177 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.16810.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.168 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10375210.1016/j.addma.2023.103752 ↗
71. 10.1002/adma.20190272510.1002/adma.201902725 ↗
72. 10.1002/aenm.20190183910.1002/aenm.201901839 ↗
73. 10.1038/ncomms796210.1038/ncomms7962 ↗
74. 10.1002/adfm.20170702410.1002/adfm.201707024 ↗
75. 10.1002/adma.20170565110.1002/adma.201705651 ↗
76. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0732510.1021/acsnano.9b07325 ↗
77. 10.1039/C7TA02041D10.1039/C7TA02041D ↗
78. 10.1002/admt.20180005310.1002/admt.201800053 ↗
79. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0030410.1021/acsnano.8b00304 ↗
80. 10.1021/acsami.7b1963510.1021/acsami.7b19635 ↗
81. 10.1039/C9TA11386J10.1039/C9TA11386J ↗
82. Feilden E. · 2017
83. 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.13822610.1016/j.jcis.2025.138226 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.ajps.2023.10083410.1016/j.ajps.2023.100834 ↗
85. 10.1002/aenm.20150021210.1002/aenm.201500212 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.12.02410.1016/j.ensm.2018.12.024 ↗
87. 10.1002/anie.20200431110.1002/anie.202004311 ↗
88. 10.1002/aenm.20140229010.1002/aenm.201402290 ↗
89. 10.1002/slct.20220394410.1002/slct.202203944 ↗
90. 10.1002/aenm.20180290610.1002/aenm.201802906 ↗
91. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0198610.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01986 ↗
92. A Universal Strategy for the Synthesis of Robust and Reversible Covalent Organic Frameworks