Evaluation of glass transition temperature and dynamic mechanical properties of autopolymerized hard direct denture reline resins
Source abstract
Abstract
This study assessed methods for evaluation of glass transition temperature (Tg) of autopolymerized hard direct denture reline resins using dynamic mechanical analysis and differential scanning calorimetry in addition to the dynamic mechanical properties. The Tg values of 3 different reline resins were determined using a dynamic viscoelastometer and differential scanning calorimeter, and rheological parameters were also determined. Although all materials exhibited higher storage modulus and loss modulus values, and a lower loss tangent at 37˚C with a higher frequency, the frequency dependence was not large. Tg values obtained by dynamic mechanical analysis were higher than those by differential scanning calorimetry and higher frequency led to higher Tg, while more stable Tg values were also obtained by that method. These results suggest that dynamic mechanical analysis is more advantageous for characterization of autopolymerized hard direct denture reline resins than differential scanning calorimetry.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University
Department of Dental and Biomedical Materials Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Hobkirk JA, Zarb G. Prolonging the useful life of complete dentures: relines, repairs, and duplications. In: Zarb G, Hobkirk JA, Eckert SE, Jacob RF, editor. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients: complete dentures and implant-supported prostheses. 13th ed. St.Louis: Elsevier, Mosby; 2013. p. 303-314.
2. 2) Atwood DA. Reduction of residual ridges: a major oral disease entity. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 26: 266-279.10.1016/0022-3913(71)90069-2 ↗
3. 3) Yoshida K, Kurogi T, Torisu T, Watanabe I, Murata H. Effects of 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl methacrylate on properties of autopolymerized hard direct denture reline resins. Dent Mater J 2013; 32: 744-752.10.4012/dmj.2013-103 ↗
4. 4) Arima T, Murata H, Hamada T. Analysis of composition and structure of hard autopolymerizing reline resins. J Oral Rehabil 1996; 23: 346-352.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb00863.x ↗
5. 5) McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Materials. 9th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2008. p.107-109, p.124-125.
6. 6) Arima T, Murata H, Hamada T. Properties of highly crosslinked autopolymerizing reline acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 55-59.10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80273-2 ↗
7. 7) Arima T, Hamada T, McCabe JF. The effects of cross-linking agents on some properties of HEMA-based resins. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1597-1601.10.1177/00220345950740091501 ↗
8. 8) Lombardo CE, Canevarolo SV, Reis JM, Machado AL, Pavarina AC, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE. Effect of microwave irradiation and water storage on the viscoelastic properties of denture base and reline acrylic resins. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012; 5: 53-61.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.09.011 ↗
9. 9) Arima T, Murata H, Hamada T. The effect of cross-linking agents on the water sorption and solubility characteristics of denture base resin. J Oral Rehabil 1996; 23: 476-480.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb00882.x ↗
10. 10) Takahashi Y, Chai J. Assessment of shear bond strength between three denture reline materials and a denture base acrylic resin. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 531-535.
11. 11) Mutluay MM, Ruyter IE. Evaluation of adhesion of chairside hard relining materials to denture base polymers. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 445-452.10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.011 ↗
12. 12) Hayakawa I, Akiba N, Keh E, Kasuga Y. Physical properties of a new denture lining material containing a fluoroalkyl methacrylate polymer. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 53-58.10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.012 ↗
13. 13) Wyatt CCL, Harrop TJ, MacEntee MI. A comparison of physical characteristics of six hard denture reline materials. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 343-346.10.1016/0022-3913(86)90117-4 ↗
14. 14) Bunch J, Johnson GH, Brudvik JS. Evaluation of hard direct reline resins. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 512-519.10.1016/0022-3913(87)90027-8 ↗
15. 15) Reis JMSN, Giampaolo ET, Pavarina AC, Machado AL, Erxleben J, Vergani CE. Exothermic behavior, degree of conversion, and viscoelastic properties of experimental and commercially available hard chairside reline resins. J Appl Polym Sci 2011; 122: 1669-1676.10.1002/app.34268 ↗
16. 16) Murata H, Seo RS, Hamada T, Polyzois GL, Frangou MJ. Dynamic mechanical properties of hard, direct denture reline resins. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98: 319-326.10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60105-X ↗
17. 17) McCabe JF, Wilson HJ. Polymers in dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 1974; 1: 335-351.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1974.tb01478.x ↗
18. 18) Phoenix RD, Mansueto MA, Ackerman NA, Jones RE. Evaluation of mechanical and thermal properties of commonly used denture base resins. J Prosthodont 2004; 13: 17-27.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04002.x ↗
19. 19) Waters M, Jagger R, Williams K, Jerolimov V. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis of denture soft lining materials. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 1627-1630.10.1016/0142-9612(95)00330-4 ↗
20. 20) Nazhat SN, Parker S, Patel MP, Braden M. Isoprene-styrene copolymer elastomer and tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate mixtures for soft prosthetic applications. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 2411-2416.10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00428-2 ↗
21. 21) Urban VM, Machado AL, Alves MO, Maciel AP, Vergani CE, Leite ER. Glass transition temperature of hard chairside reline materials after post-polymerisation treatments. Gerodontology 2010; 27: 230-235.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00312.x ↗
22. 22) Rodriguez LS, Paleari AG, Giro G, de Oliveira Junior NM, Pero AC, Compagnoni MA. Chemical characterization and flexural strength of a denture base acrylic resin with monomer 2-tert-butylaminoethyl methacrylate. J Prosthodont 2013; 22: 292-297.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00942.x ↗
23. 23) Ferry JD. Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1980. p.11-14.
24. 24) Huggett R, Brooks SC, Satguranathan R, Bell GA. Evaluation of analytical techniques for measurement of denture-base acrylic resin glass-transition temperature. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 17-19.10.1016/0109-5641(90)90038-G ↗
25. 25) Nielsen LE, Landel RF. Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 1994. p.135-154.
26. 26) ASTM (1995) E1640. Standard test method for assignment of the glass transition temperature by dynamic mechanical analysis.
27. 27) McCabe JF, Wilson HJ. The use of differential scanning calorimetry for the evaluation of dental materials. J Oral Rehabil 1980; 7: 235-243.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1980.tb00440.x ↗
28. 28) Gould TE, Piland SG, Shin J, McNair O, Hoyle CE, Nazarenko S.Characterization of mouthguard materials: thermal properties of commercialized products. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1593-1602.10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.003 ↗
29. 29) Murata H, Taguchi N, Hamada T, McCabe JF. Dynamic viscoelastic properties and the age changes of long-term soft denture liners. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1421-1427.10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00010-7 ↗
30. 30) Japanese Industrial Standards (1987) JIS K 7121. Testing methods for transition temperatures of plastics.
31. 31) Okuyama Y, Shiraishi T, Yoshida K, Kurogi T, Watanabe I, Murata H. Influence of composition and powder/liquid ratio on setting characteristics and mechanical properties of autopolymerized hard direct denture reline resins based on methyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 522-529.10.4012/dmj.2014-077 ↗
32. 32) Murphy WM, Huggett R, Handley RW, Brooks SC. Rigid cold curing resins for direct use in the oral cavity. Br Dent J 1986; 160: 391-394.10.1038/sj.bdj.4805870 ↗
33. 33) Kroschwitz JI (Mita I). Concise encyclopedia of polymer science and engineering. Tokyo: Maruzen Co; 1994. p.681-683.