Photoelastic stress analysis of different prefabricated post-and-core materials
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate stress developed by a combination of a stainless steel post or a fiber-reinforced resin post with a silver amalgam core or a composite resin core. Two-dimensional photoelastic models were used to simulate root dentin. Posts (ParaPost XT and ParaPost-FiberWhite) were cemented with a luting agent (RelyX Unicem). Silver amalgam cores and composite resin cores were fabricated on the posts. Complete crowns were fabricated and cemented on the cores. Each model was analyzed with 2 force magnitudes and in 2 directions. Fringe orders were recorded and compared using ANOVA (p=0.05) and the Scheffe's test. With vertical force, no stress differences occurred among the 4 groups (p=0.159). With a 30-degree force, there was stress differences among the 4 groups (p<0.001). The combination of a fiber-reinforced post and composite resin core could potentially reduce stresses within the radicular dentin when angled loads are applied.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) Morgano SM, Hashem AF, Fatoohi K, Rose L. A nationwide survey of contemporary philosophies and techniques of restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 259-267.10.1016/0022-3913(94)90339-5 ↗
2. 2) Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 400-405.10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80156-5 ↗
3. 3) Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Collard EW, Standlee JP. Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. Oral Surg 1972; 33: 952-960.10.1016/0030-4220(72)90187-9 ↗
4. 4) Trabert KC, Caputo AA, Collard EW, Standlee JP. Stress transfer to the dental pulp by retentive pins. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 29: 442-449.10.1016/S0022-3913(73)80023-X ↗
5. 5) Standlee JP, Caputo AA. The retentive and stress distributing properties of split threaded endodontic dowels. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 436-442.10.1016/0022-3913(92)90406-Z ↗
6. 6) Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Holcomb J, Trabert KC. The retentive and stress distributing properties of a threaded endodontic dowel. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 44: 398-404.10.1016/0022-3913(80)90097-9 ↗
7. 7) Henry PJ, Bower RC. Secondary intention post and core. Aust Dent J 1977; 22: 128-131.10.1111/j.1834-7819.1977.tb04464.x ↗
8. 8) Thorsteinsson TS, Yaman P, Craig RG. Stress analysis of four prefabricated posts. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 30-33.10.1016/0022-3913(92)90043-A ↗
9. 9) Nayyar A, Walton RE, Leonard LA. Amalgam coronalradicular dowel and core technique for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43: 511-515.10.1016/0022-3913(80)90322-4 ↗
10. 10) Johnson IK, Schwartz NL, Blackwell RT. Evaluation and restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1976; 93: 597-605.10.14219/jada.archive.1976.0235 ↗
11. 11) Christian GW, Button GL, Mow PC, England MC, Douglas HB. Post and core restoration in endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Endod 1982; 7: 182-185.10.1016/S0099-2399(81)80232-4 ↗
12. 12) Chan KC, Fuller J, Khowassah M. The adaptation of new amalgam and composite resin to pins. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 38: 392-395.10.1016/0022-3913(77)90091-9 ↗
13. 13) Paige H, Hirsch SM, Gelb MN. Effects of temporary cements on crown-to-composite resin core bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 49-52.10.1016/0022-3913(86)90072-7 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985.tb00571.x10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985.tb00571.x ↗
15. 15) Oliva RA, Lowe JA. Dimensional stability of composite used as a core material. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 56: 554-561.10.1016/0022-3913(86)90421-X ↗
16. 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90376-710.1016/0022-3913(84)90376-7 ↗
17. 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90176-810.1016/0022-3913(84)90176-8 ↗
18. 18) Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 535-543.10.1016/0022-3913(89)90272-2 ↗
19. 19) Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Biomechanics in dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1987. p. 201.
20. 20) Duret B, ReyNaud M, Duret F. New concept of coronoradicular reconstruction: the compositpost (1). [in French] Chir Dent France 1990; 60: 131-141.
21. 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70103-910.1016/S0022-3913(98)70103-9 ↗
22. 22) Mannocci F, Qualtrough AJ, Worthington HV, Watson TF, PittFord TR. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: Five-year results. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 9-15.
23. 23) Grandini S, Goracci C, Tay FP, Grandini R, Ferrari M. Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 399-404.
24. 24) Cagidiaco MC, Radovic I, Simonetti M, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber post restorations in endodontically treated teeth: 2-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 293-298.
25. 25) Segerstrom S, Astback J, Ekstrand K. A retrospective long term study of teeth restored with prefabricated carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts. Swed Dent J 2006; 30: 1-8.
26. 26) Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989; 15: 512-516.10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80191-8 ↗
27. 27) Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 256-263.10.1067/mpr.2002.122014 ↗
28. 28) Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. Clinical studies of fiber posts: A literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21: 328-336.
29. 10.1067/mpr.2002.12849210.1067/mpr.2002.128492 ↗
30. 30) Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Influence of clinical baseline findings on the survival of 2 post systems: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 173-178.
31. 31) Mahler DB, Peyton FA. Photoelasticity as a research technique for analyzing stresses in dental structures. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 831-838.10.1177/00220345550340060601 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80298-210.1016/S0099-2399(99)80298-2 ↗
33. 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00026.x10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00026.x ↗
34. 34) Freilich MA, Meiers JC. Fiber-reinforced composite prostheses. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48: 345-362.
35. 35) Ferracane JL. Materials in dentistry, principles and applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 281-291.
36. 36) Phillips RW. Skinner’s science of dental materials. 9th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1991. p. 491.
37. 10.4012/dmj.28.20410.4012/dmj.28.204 ↗
38. 38) Pegerotti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2667-2682.10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00407-0 ↗