Tensile Bond Strength of One-step Self-etch Adhesives to Er:YAG Laser-irradiated and Non-irradiated Enamel
Source abstract
Abstract
This study determined the bond strengths to Er:YAG laser-irradiated and non-irradiated bovine enamel of three one-step self-etch adhesives (AQ Bond Plus (AQP), G-Bond (GB), and Clearfil Tri-S Bond (TS)) and one two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil Megabond (MB)). Eighty SiC paper-ground bovine enamel surfaces were used, of which half were laser-irradiated. The enamel surfaces were bonded to a resin composite with each adhesive, and tensile bond strengths were determined after 24 hours. For non-irradiated enamel groups, MB achieved greater bond strength to enamel than GB and TS (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between MB and AQP (p > 0.05). For laser-irradiated enamel groups, no significant differences were found among the four adhesives (p > 0.05). Additionally, for each adhesive, no significant differences were found between laser-irradiated and non-irradiated enamel. It was thus concluded that Er: YAG laser irradiation of enamel did not affect the tensile bond strength of one-step and two-step self-etch adhesives.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental Erosion and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 1) De Moor RJG, Delme KIM. Erbium lasers and adhesion to tooth structure. J Oral Laser Appl 2006; 6: 7-21.
2. 2) Bader C, Krejci I. Indications and limitations of Er:YAG laser applications in dentistry. Am J Dent 2006; 19: 178-186.
3. 3) Sonntag KD, Klitzman B, Burkes EJ, Hoke J, Moshonov J. Pulpal response to cavity preparation with the Er:YAG and Mark III free electron lasers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1996; 81: 695-702.10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80076-X ↗
4. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)18:3<294::AID-LSM11>3.0.CO;2-610.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)18:3<294::AID-LSM11>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
5. 5) Oelgiesser D, Blasbalg J, Ben-Amar A. Cavity preparation by Er-YAG laser on pulpal temperature rise. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 96-98.
6. 6) Attrill DC, Davies RM, King TA, Dickinson MR, Blinkhorn AS. Thermal effects of the Er:YAG laser on a simulated dental pulp: a quantitative evaluation of the effects of a water spray. J Dent 2004; 32: 35-40.10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00137-4 ↗
7. 7) Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Matter D, Van Landuyt K, Lambechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch & rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 647-660.
8. 8) Attrill DC, Farrar SR, King TA, Dickinson MR, Davies RM, Blinkhorn AS. Er:YAG (λ=2.94 μm) laser etching of dental enamel as an alternative to acid etching. Laser Med Sci 2000; 15: 154-161.10.1007/PL00011311 ↗
9. 10.1067/mpr.2000.10860010.1067/mpr.2000.108600 ↗
10. 10) Roebuck EM, Saunders WP, Whitters CJ. Influence of Erbium: YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 280-284.
11. 11) Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marchall GW. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 340-346.10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00092-0 ↗
12. 12) Corona SAM, Borsatto MC, Palma Dibb RG, Ramos RP, Brugnera A Jr, Pecora JD. Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 491-497.
13. 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21281.x10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21281.x ↗
14. 10.1177/15440591050840020410.1177/154405910508400204 ↗
15. 15) Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Nonaka T, Pecora JD, Palma Dibb RG. Effect of Er:YAG laser on bond strength to dentin of a self-etching primer and two single-bottle adhesive systems. Laser Surg Med 2002; 31: 164-170.10.1002/lsm.10106 ↗
16. 16) Aizawa K, Kameyama A, Kato J, Oda Y, Hirai Y. Influence of free hand vs. uniform irradiation on tensile bond strength in Er:YAG-lased dentin. J Adhes Dent 2008: 10 (in press).
17. 17) Trajtenberg CP, Pereira PN, Powers JM. Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an Erbium: YAG laser. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 331-336.
18. MEERBEEK BART VAN · 2005 · 24 · 110.4012/dmj.24.1 ↗
19. 10.1177/15440591040830060410.1177/154405910408300604 ↗
20. 20) Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 329-334.
21. 21) Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 2002; 30: 83-90.10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00002-7 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00064-710.1016/S0300-5712(02)00064-7 ↗
23. 23) Ishikawa A, Shimada Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Micro-tensile and micro-shear bond strengths of current self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2007; 20: 161-166
24. 24) Goncalves M, Corona SAM, Pecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG. Influence of the frequency of Er:YAG laser on bond strength of dental enamel. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2003; 21: 105-108.10.1089/104454703765035538 ↗
25. 1993 · 1880 · 16310.1117/12.148319 ↗
26. MINE ATSUSHI · 2006 · 25 · 21410.4012/dmj.25.214 ↗
27. 27) Mine A. Effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation on bonding, structural and mechanical properties of dental hard tissues. J Okayama Dent Assoc 2003; 22: 123-137.
28. 10.1002/lsm.190009040510.1002/lsm.1900090405 ↗